Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Sohl" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: I really have no problem with an experience criteria (e.g.a time interval between General and Extra). Nor I, but it would make more work for FCC. Right now anyone can go from any license class or no license at all to Extra in one exam session. An experience requirement would mean that many hams would need at least two exam sessions and two FCC paperwork cycles to get to Extra. More admin work = not something FCC would like. Any idea what percent of people actually pass both the General and the Extra in one session? Probably a considerable number. The number of Generals is pretty stable while the number of Extras just keeps growing. Note too that for one VE fee you get one chance at every element you haven't already passed. If someone goes to a VE session for General, there's no harm or cost (except time) if they try the Extra while they're at it. I've known more than a few hams who went to a VE session intending on the General and who came home with an Extra. Not a new thing, either. Way back in 1968, when I went to the FCC office at 2nd & Chestnut to take the General, the examiner suggested that I try the Advanced while I was there. No additional cost and since I had the General in the bag, it would actually save him some work in the future. A 14-year-old with any sense at all did not say "no" to The Man, so I tried the Advanced written, and passed. I suspect the number is relatively small. Check the AH0A site under "new licenses". While most hams start out as Techs, every month a small but not negligible number go straight to General or Extra. That's my question, how small is that number? Also, the AH0A site doesn't truly indicate if someone went immediately from Tech to Extra at the same VE session so the ability to determine how many did so via AH0A stats isn't accurate. Regardless of the number, I doubt FCC would bring back the experience requirement after 30 years without one. Particularly since they'd have to enforce it. What's to enforce? All it comes down to is license issuing. Seems all the FCC need do is not allow the upgrade unless the applicant has 'N' years of elapsed time since getting their General. The FCC database system could automatically withhold issuing the Extra unless the time interval is elapsed. It could even be automatic so the person might pass their Extra at some point and the FCC system having been notified of the person passing Extra would then be updated and at the elapsed time interval, the FCC could then automatically issue the Extra upgrade. Just some basic software application reprograming as I see it. Cheers, Bill K2UNK That would not work, because of the rampant corruption in the FCC & ARRL. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
DX test Results | Broadcasting | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave |