Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: No...Your duty as a "good citizen" will be done when you publically state, and then STICK TO IT, your intent to not initiate or perpetuate the use of diminutives towards people who don't use them on you. why should our side be nice with you screaming pedophile making false claims of mental illness I seriously doubt there's an "our side" for Brian that includes you, Markie. And Markie...The comments were aimed squarely at Brian...Not you. At least if Brian deceides to ignore what I said, I know he thought it over. You're incapable of rational thought. For example, you seem to think your name is "Brian". Steve, K4YZ |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: And another thing. Jim, Dave, and Mike just might have been able to pull Steve back from the brink with a little intervention. But no. They sanctioned his lunacy by "thier" silence. I have "another thing" for you, Brian: "Jim, Dave and Mike" are no more responsible for posts other than their own, than you are responsible for Mark's, Len Anderson's or Roger Wiseman's. Never said that you were responsible. You pointed to us as having had some obligation to pull Steve back from some brink you've manufactured. I'm not in manufacturing. Sure you are. Nope. I hope that clears things up for you. Hope that clears things up for you. No, it didn't do that at all. If we aren't responsible for Steve's actions (making them what *you* think they should be), why would we have pulled him back? I'm not responsible for other people's kids, but I donate to Toys for Tots. A project of the United States Marine Corps Reserve...That's gotta get you grinding your teeth a bit! I think the Marines are a great bunch of people. I think that people that try to catch a ride on "thier" coattails aren't. I'm not responsible for the neighbors dog biting another neighbor's kid, but I pulled the dog off. Hate to see him gnawing on YOUR bone, eh...?!?! Huh? Do you see how it works? Not my responsibility, but it was the right thing to do. But SO FAR, you've done NOTHING constructive! You told the aforementioned tales, along with having stated your "admiration" for a documented pathological liar who ALSO happens to be trying to undermine the SAME "Amateur Radio" that you are a licensee of...And "the Morse Code test" has little or nothing to do with what I am refring to... You can refring and refring and refring, but you are what a CBer would call "an Agitater." Grow up. But you're a pretty worthless friend to Steve for seeing him carry on the way he does and saying nothing. It's hard to say something in a forum where all we have is the written word. Even harder when the written word is encoded in dits and dahs, but many here want it MANDATED. You've not been paying attention...but then that's not new either. So you do or you don't want the Morse Code exam kept as a licensing requirement? Make up your minds. Have you written anything to bring your friend Mark Morgan back to reality? Reality? How am I supposed to do that. I'm not a medical professional. ;^) Markie's problems are psychological, not medical. Dyslexia is a mental problem? Perhaps the most effective course of action would be for Steve to get off Mark's ass and quit calling around Mark's county. I've not called a single person anywhere about Mark, Brian... Written letters signed "Xteve Xobeson, LPN? What have you written to Len toward straightening him out? I've said he's too hard on you guys. Uh huh... Well, he is. All I've noted here is you egging him on. Some friend *you* are. Aw, geez. Some of the greatest fun I've had on here was the Hop Sing-speak; english as a first and second language. It was only funny because Steve got so upset over it. Gonna call my wife, gotta show my kids! There's a guy that takes himself much too seriously. If you think your baby talk was the issue, then you're lying to yourself in addition to us..... That seemed to be what you were commenting about. Is that the double standard you're always going on about? OK, Dave, I get your point. Notice to Len: Start playing nice with these guys when they start playing nice with you. Uhhhhhh..... Brian.... Jim Miccolis has NEVER called the putz anything BUT "Len" or "Leonard" or any other abbreviation of his name that Lennie didn't himself use, yet Lennie's pelted him for YEARS with NUMEROUS diminutives. You have too, yet I have NEVER seen Jim refer to YOU as anything except "Brian", "Burke", or by your callsign. We'll start with you. Once you've reformed, we'll work with Jim. My duty as a friend to Len and good citizen of RRAP is now satisfied. No...Your duty as a "good citizen" will be done when you publically state, and then STICK TO IT, your intent to not initiate or perpetuate the use of diminutives towards people who don't use them on you. I call you "Steve" at least 99% of the time. I call Jim by his name more than 99% of the time. I do slip up once in a while and refer to him as Quitefine. I wonder why I do that? Now what do you call me? And Yes, Brian, I will do the same for you, effective with THIS post...assuming you do and continue the same. Otherwise, it's right on back to the mudslinging. I don't beleive you. We've gone this route before. Yet I continue to call you Steve and you continue with the diminuitives. We'll see how long you last this time. Your turn, Dave. No, Brian...it's YOURS. Steve, K4YZ Steve, K4YZ bb |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: No...Your duty as a "good citizen" will be done when you publically state, and then STICK TO IT, your intent to not initiate or perpetuate the use of diminutives towards people who don't use them on you. why should our side be nice with you screaming pedophile making false claims of mental illness I seriously doubt there's an "our side" for Brian that includes you, Markie. And Markie...The comments were aimed squarely at Brian...Not you. At least if Brian deceides to ignore what I said, I know he thought it over. You're incapable of rational thought. For example, you seem to think your name is "Brian". Steve, K4YZ Marks raises a good point. Why do you accuse people of pedophilia? Are you licensed to do so? |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: No...Your duty as a "good citizen" will be done when you publically state, and then STICK TO IT, your intent to not initiate or perpetuate the use of diminutives towards people who don't use them on you. why should our side be nice with you screaming pedophile making false claims of mental illness I seriously doubt there's an "our side" for Brian that includes you, Markie. really now you know what other people think And Markie...The comments were aimed squarely at Brian...Not you. At least if Brian deceides to ignore what I said, I know he thought it over. public forum Stevie You're incapable of rational thought. For example, you seem to think your name is "Brian". ah Stevie is going like Dan thinking he has the right to carry on a private discusion out in the open it is you that can't think rationaly or it seems at all you "think you have the right to ditatet to other hwo the live and believe for example Steve, K4YZ |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Have you written anything to bring your friend Mark Morgan back to reality? Reality? How am I supposed to do that. I'm not a medical professional. ;^) Markie's problems are psychological, not medical. Dyslexia is a mental problem? Dyslexia is merely the tip of Mark's personal iceberg. not realy but of course you know more about someone you have never met than he know about himself I call you "Steve" at least 99% of the time. I call Jim by his name more than 99% of the time. I do slip up once in a while and refer to him as Quitefine. I wonder why I do that? I wonder why you've carefully avoided the times when you've called him other names. wonder why you just lied? Dave K8MN |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: I'm not in manufacturing. Sure you are. Nope. Sure you are. I'm not responsible for other people's kids, but I donate to Toys for Tots. A project of the United States Marine Corps Reserve...That's gotta get you grinding your teeth a bit! I think the Marines are a great bunch of people. I think that people that try to catch a ride on "thier" coattails aren't. Me to...That's why I am glad Frankie got court martialed. That's "Frank." Remember our little agreement? And Frank wasn't a USMC Reservist. You've not been paying attention...but then that's not new either. So you do or you don't want the Morse Code exam kept as a licensing requirement? Make up your minds. Mine's already made up. I said it clearly before. I don't like the way things have gone, but it IS a democratic society. I'd like to see some part of it stay and have explained myn reasons why. It's no mystery...Unless you've not been paying attention. I've paid attention to your mixed messages. I was just asking which way you were going with it yesterday. Notice to Len: Start playing nice with these guys when they start playing nice with you. Uhhhhhh..... Brian.... Jim Miccolis has NEVER called the putz anything BUT "Len" or "Leonard" or any other abbreviation of his name that Lennie didn't himself use, yet Lennie's pelted him for YEARS with NUMEROUS diminutives. You have too, yet I have NEVER seen Jim refer to YOU as anything except "Brian", "Burke", or by your callsign. We'll start with you. Once you've reformed, we'll work with Jim. There's nothing to work with with Jim. He's already establsihed a track record of NOT calling people by diminutives. He doesn't do it to Lennie...he doesn't do it to Mark or you. So...What's YOUR excuse for doing it to him? Like I said, we'll start with you and when you've shown improvement for some period of time, we can move on to Jim. Jim may take only a minute or two, but I'm trying to be inclusive here. My duty as a friend to Len and good citizen of RRAP is now satisfied. No...Your duty as a "good citizen" will be done when you publically state, and then STICK TO IT, your intent to not initiate or perpetuate the use of diminutives towards people who don't use them on you. I call you "Steve" at least 99% of the time. And you mimick Lennie's diminutives. And Frankies. I "mimick" nothing. I call Jim by his name more than 99% of the time. I do slip up once in a while and refer to him as Quitefine. I wonder why I do that? Me too. But I wonder WHY you call him "Rev Jim", "Jimmie", "Reverend Jim" AT ALL, Brian. You're not paying attention to attributions. I've ceased calling him Rev Jim because of his unRev-like bahavior. I do not call him "Jimmie" He's never done anything similar to you that I am even remotelya ware of.... I was through with Jim when he said that a Morse Code test would be a barrier to Morse Code use, then tried to reneg on it. Yet it is precisely true and is what I've been on here about. Now Jim is only about being Len's adversary. He's run out of substance. Now what do you call me? As of yesterday, I'll call you Brian until you slip back into some other practice. There is no other "practice." The things I have posted today are Quitesimilar the the things that I posted last week. It is you who must reach for a higher standard. A year ago I called you "Brian"...I did slip a couple of times and immediately apologized for it... A year ago.... And Yes, Brian, I will do the same for you, effective with THIS post...assuming you do and continue the same. Otherwise, it's right on back to the mudslinging. I don't beleive you. We've gone this route before. Yet I continue to call you Steve and you continue with the diminuitives. "believe" Yes we HAVE gone this rout before...And when you started back in on the diminutives and mistruths, I asked you point-blank if that's what you wanted. You indicated you "could take anything you can hand out".... The diminuitives AND the mistruths. The diminuitives are posted by other people, but the "mistruths" part... That's where this whole thing is going to fall apart. You don't have a good concept on what constitutes the truth. OK...We played your game. Tired yet? You're exhausting me, Steve. I don't know how much longer I can keep this up for. We'll see how long you last this time. No... We'll see how long YOU last, Brian. Steve, K4YZ Steve, I have no problem being civil with people on RRAP. Been doing most of my time here. Like your concept on truth, you have trouble differentiating between me and other posters on RRAP. |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... I'm not responsible for the neighbors dog biting another neighbor's kid, but I pulled the dog off. Do you see how it works? Not my responsibility, but it was the right thing to do. I had a neighbor (now thankfully moved away) who's dog used to shi+ in my front yard. Bitch neighbor let it run around loose and said not to worry about the dogcrap as "the rain would wash it away". That gave me some inspriation. I went and put a cap from a spray paint can into the lawn under a bush near where Spot-the-Shi+dog liked to leave a deposit. The cap was 1/4" below ground level so it was not readily visible. I would fill it late at night so as nobody would notice, dip****s. For the first few days I added sugar to the water that I filled the cap with and ole Shi+dog would happliy lap it up after he took a dump. Content he was now 'trained' to drink from my cup-of-death, on day #5 I added a nice tablespoon of Prestone to the water and ole Shi+dog lapped it up like it was gold. He came back one more time and that was his last. That dog NEVER shi+ on my lawn again and the bitch who owned shi+dog moved away 3 Months later after she and her boyfriend started fighting. Last I heard he beat the crap out of her someplace a few towns away. I could only hope that my giving (now deceased) ****dog his "final daily drink" aided in that tasty predicament. Don't get mad......GET EVEN. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stevie doesn't get it is about HIS words such as these | Policy | |||
Can Stevie be trusted to make professional treament of a pagan? | Policy | |||
Stevie Claims "action" more like missing in action most likely | Policy | |||
IT WILL NEVER END, PEEPEEHOLIC, NEVER! | CB | |||
STEVIE IS A PEEPEEHOLIC | CB |