| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
November 22nd 05, 04:12 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
more stevie abuse
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: cut Two things come to mind: (1) If you were REALLY that concerned, you would have done a "Markie" and changed the subject line. This now makes the FIFTH response with your name and call in it. Obviously it's NOT that big an issue for you. Steve, I get to decide what is an issue for me, and I decided a long time ago. What did you decide a long time ago? what he decided that you were a jerk for one thing it is something you prove again daily you are a jerk and a coward It was also explained to you a long time ago. Yet you ignore my wishes because you're a jerk. I ignore your wishes because you ignore everyone elses, Brian. projecting again You want what you want, and unless what someone else wants is only that, too bad. projecting yet again While I've got your attention, why did you change Mark's attribution? For the same reason you refuse to answer my question, Brian...Because I want to. meaning you are not into civlity and indedd that you advocate Rape by your owns Standard Now...if sandlot time is over, do we get an answer to the pending question about YOUR lack of civility towards those who don't treat you that way...?!?! what lack of civlity are you reffering to? Jim often isless than civil indeed is down right insulting in his style so Brain and myself for that give it right to him. You OTOH allege anyone needs to accounts to YOU why they choose a given style You seem to be making a lot of noise about my alleged incivility, Brian, but there's a lot longer history for you to account for. no aleeged about Or do we attribute that to the NCTA Double Standard that you and the Feeble Five claim doesn't exist...??? no double standard exists except by theProcoders esp folks like you that have avoided the same question for 7 year running Steve, K4YZ |
|
#13
November 22nd 05, 11:56 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
A Direct Question
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ and N0IMD back and forth....Starting with me..... K4YZ Jim Miccolis has NEVER called the putz anything BUT "Len" or "Leonard" or any other abbreviation of his name that Lennie didn't himself use, yet Lennie's pelted him for YEARS with NUMEROUS diminutives. You have too, yet I have NEVER seen Jim refer to YOU as anything except "Brian", "Burke", or by your callsign. N0IMD We'll start with you. Once you've reformed, we'll work with Jim. K4YZ There's nothing to "work with" with Jim. He's already established a track record of NOT calling people by diminutives. He doesn't do it to Lennie...he doesn't do it to Mark or you. So...What's YOUR excuse for doing it to him? N0IMD Like I said, we'll start with you and when you've shown improvement for some period of time, we can move on to Jim. Jim may take only a minute or two, but I'm trying to be inclusive here. You keep suggesting that there's something to "move on to", Brian. I want to know what it is you think you have to "move on to" vis-a-vis conducting yourself to YOUR standards in talking to/about Jim Miccolis. What's YOUR excuse for using diminutive language towards Jim Miccolis when he's NEVER done it to you...?!?! Steve, K4YZ Steve, you're blowing it. I prefer to keep my name and callsign off of the web. As you well know, my call is convertible to my address, and I don't want that plastered on the web, either. Then you shouldn't be here. Or do like Markie and get a PO box or one of those surrogate mail delivery services. Or is this just another "I Sure Hope My Family Won't Ever See How I REALLY Behave" redirects? You've got 24 hours to apologize and promise not to do so again. So I guess THIS is the "direct answer" to the "direct question"... Why am I not surprised...?!?! Steve, K4YZ Whatever made me think you'd behave yourself? Two things come to mind: (1) If you were REALLY that concerned, you would have done a "Markie" and changed the subject line. This now makes the FIFTH response with your name and call in it. Obviously it's NOT that big an issue for you. Steve, I get to decide what is an issue for me, and I decided a long time ago. What did you decide a long time ago? Not to post my callsign to RRAP. Do you recall making a big deal about it at the time? It was also explained to you a long time ago. Yet you ignore my wishes because you're a jerk. I ignore your wishes because you ignore everyone elses, Brian. You wish me to call you Steve. Your wish is granted. You want what you want, and unless what someone else wants is only that, too bad. Duh! You want what you want and disrespect eveyone who gets in your way. While I've got your attention, why did you change Mark's attribution? For the same reason you refuse to answer my question, Brian...Because I want to. Not answering your questions is not libel. Accusing another of rape or calling them a rapist is. It is also dispicable. -You- are dispicable. Now...if sandlot time is over, do we get an answer to the pending question about YOUR lack of civility towards those who don't treat you that way...?!?! My lack??? You prove yourself uncivil almost every time you post. Deal's off. |
|
#14
November 29th 05, 09:21 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
N0IMD Whines, Still Refuses To Answer To HIS "Double Standard"
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: K4YZ and N0IMD back and forth....Starting with me..... K4YZ Jim Miccolis has NEVER called the putz anything BUT "Len" or "Leonard" or any other abbreviation of his name that Lennie didn't himself use, yet Lennie's pelted him for YEARS with NUMEROUS diminutives. You have too, yet I have NEVER seen Jim refer to YOU as anything except "Brian", "Burke", or by your callsign. N0IMD We'll start with you. Once you've reformed, we'll work with Jim. K4YZ There's nothing to "work with" with Jim. He's already established a track record of NOT calling people by diminutives. He doesn't do it to Lennie...he doesn't do it to Mark or you. So...What's YOUR excuse for doing it to him? N0IMD Like I said, we'll start with you and when you've shown improvement for some period of time, we can move on to Jim. Jim may take only a minute or two, but I'm trying to be inclusive here. You keep suggesting that there's something to "move on to", Brian. I want to know what it is you think you have to "move on to" vis-a-vis conducting yourself to YOUR standards in talking to/about Jim Miccolis. What's YOUR excuse for using diminutive language towards Jim Miccolis when he's NEVER done it to you...?!?! Steve, K4YZ Steve, you're blowing it. I prefer to keep my name and callsign off of the web. As you well know, my call is convertible to my address, and I don't want that plastered on the web, either. Then you shouldn't be here. Or do like Markie and get a PO box or one of those surrogate mail delivery services. Or is this just another "I Sure Hope My Family Won't Ever See How I REALLY Behave" redirects? You've got 24 hours to apologize and promise not to do so again. So I guess THIS is the "direct answer" to the "direct question"... Why am I not surprised...?!?! Steve, K4YZ Whatever made me think you'd behave yourself? Two things come to mind: (1) If you were REALLY that concerned, you would have done a "Markie" and changed the subject line. This now makes the FIFTH response with your name and call in it. Obviously it's NOT that big an issue for you. Steve, I get to decide what is an issue for me, and I decided a long time ago. What did you decide a long time ago? Not to post my callsign to RRAP. Do you recall making a big deal about it at the time? If you're that scared of any potential adverse outcomes from being on the Internet, Brain, stop being on the Internet. It was also explained to you a long time ago. Yet you ignore my wishes because you're a jerk. I ignore your wishes because you ignore everyone elses, Brian. You wish me to call you Steve. Your wish is granted. Don't worry about it. You want what you want, and unless what someone else wants is only that, too bad. Duh! You want what you want and disrespect eveyone who gets in your way. No, I don't, but nice try, Brian. While I've got your attention, why did you change Mark's attribution? For the same reason you refuse to answer my question, Brian...Because I want to. Not answering your questions is not libel. Accusing another of rape or calling them a rapist is. Markie has already expressed thinly veiled "interest" in sex-by-force. It is also dispicable. -You- are dispicable. So says you, yet another documented and archived liar, Brain. Now...if sandlot time is over, do we get an answer to the pending question about YOUR lack of civility towards those who don't treat you that way...?!?! My lack??? You prove yourself uncivil almost every time you post. Deal's off. What deal? You and Markie have significant misunderstandings of what constitutes a "deal", wager, bet, agreement, or any other word that insinuates a mutual understanding or intent to participate in cooperative exchange, Brain. It requires agreed upon language and parameters, and finally an expression of intent to abide by that language and those parameters by BOTH parties. All you've done all week is whine. And at the end of the day, Brain, you've STILL not answered why you give others (OK...me...) a hard time about using diminutives, yet do it yourself with people who have NEVER done it to you...Not even remotely... Steve, K4YZ |
|
#15
November 29th 05, 07:02 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
stevie threatens people to avoid answering the question put to him
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Steve, I get to decide what is an issue for me, and I decided a long time ago. What did you decide a long time ago? Not to post my callsign to RRAP. Do you recall making a big deal about it at the time? If you're that scared of any potential adverse outcomes from being on the Internet, Brain, stop being on the Internet. more threats from Stevie It was also explained to you a long time ago. Yet you ignore my wishes because you're a jerk. I ignore your wishes because you ignore everyone elses, Brian. You wish me to call you Steve. Your wish is granted. Don't worry about it. proof of another stevie lie You want what you want, and unless what someone else wants is only that, too bad. Duh! You want what you want and disrespect eveyone who gets in your way. No, I don't, but nice try, Brian. an new lie from stevie While I've got your attention, why did you change Mark's attribution? For the same reason you refuse to answer my question, Brian...Because I want to. Not answering your questions is not libel. Accusing another of rape or calling them a rapist is. Markie has already expressed thinly veiled "interest" in sex-by-force. more lies from stevie It is also dispicable. -You- are dispicable. So says you, yet another documented and archived liar, Brain. Now...if sandlot time is over, do we get an answer to the pending question about YOUR lack of civility towards those who don't treat you that way...?!?! My lack??? You prove yourself uncivil almost every time you post. Deal's off. What deal? right you offer no deal you makes demands that other obey YOUR will cut |
|
#16
November 29th 05, 07:07 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
stevei contiues his efferts at intimadatio
On 29 Nov 2005 00:21:02 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: cut Steve, I get to decide what is an issue for me, and I decided a long time ago. What did you decide a long time ago? Not to post my callsign to RRAP. Do you recall making a big deal about it at the time? If you're that scared of any potential adverse outcomes from being on the Internet, Brain, stop being on the Internet. a clear confession to effort to cow and frighten off his foes stevie is a coward _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
|
#17
December 8th 05, 04:51 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
stevei attack and doesn't even tell the truth about that
On 21 Nov 2005 22:33:00 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: cutTwo things come to mind: (1) If you were REALLY that concerned, you would have done a "Markie" and changed the subject line. and what did I have to do with this attack thread of yours What attack thread? this one that you called more markie mularke I asked Brian a direct question. He accuses me of "misbehaving", calling others names, etc, when it's C L E A R L Y evident that he does this to people who actually go out of their way to treat HIM with some dignity and respect. anther lie stevie cut everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Direct TV question? | Antenna | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #667 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #667 | General | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #667 | Dx | |||
| Question about sending QSL direct to Brazil | General | |||
Linear Mode
