Your knowledge of the Pierian Spring is shallow if your only
association is through Pope's reference.

If, however, it is merely the case that you wish to be
perceived as a Childish Broadcaster (CBer) then
continue as you do below.

LT wrote:
You need to drink deeper. Shallow draughts have intoxicated your mind
and you have not yet tasted the Pierian Spring. (apologies to A. Pope)

Pierian Spring wrote:
A number of potential recruits are in great danger of being
misled into thinking that they are Radio Hams when, in fact,
they are nothing of the kind! As it is the season of goodwill,
let us show our goodwill by saving these poor deluded fools
from the mischievous ne-er-do-wells who will attempt to
mislead them. (Radio Hams are technically-motivated people
and not merely turnip-brained button pushers like CBers and
like M3/CBers)

What is Ham Radio?

_On Aug 9 1996, at 7:00 am_

Gareth Alun Evans - G4ASW
Published this message to the Public Domain

G.A.Evans, Director, Out And About Systems Ltd
Software Consultancy for Telecommunications, Real Time and ATE
13 Hardens Close, Chippenham, Wiltshire, SN15 3AA
(01249) 651897

Yes morse is obsolete, but also useful.
The former is no basis for banning it.
The latter is no basis for using it as a passport to the HF Bands.

Why do we need a further exam for incentive licensing? Do we not have
enough already?....
(1) CB licence as an appetite whetter
(2) Novice licence
(3) RAE.

(Perversely, the Novice RAE is a higher technical challenge than the
RAE!)

Restore the RAE to its technical status, and we have a sufficient and
complete incentive licensing scheme, without anything to do with the
Morse (Sorry, Vail) Code.

Arguments relating to international requirements are redundant - laws
change.

Amateur Radio is dying, and this is due IMHO in no small part to the
consumerism CBish activities of today, QSLing as an end in itself, WAB,
contest operating other than as a means of evaluating one's technical
equipment, squeakies on repeaters, walts on URA, and inane discussions
about the turnips growing in one's garden.

72's de Gareth G4SDW GQRP 3339

________________

Regards

Micky

Gareth Alun Evans - G4ASW

Published this message to the Public Domain


G4ASW
M YORKE
8 ST JOHN PLACE
PORT WASHINGTON
NEW YORK 11050
USA
==================
I think , Gareth Evans' callsign is : G4DSW

Just ignore his outpouring

Frank KN6WH / GM0CSZ

"Micky Taker" is, in reality,

Eric Williams, M3EJO,
19, Raglans,
Exeter,
EX2 8XN.

He is one of those disgraceful adults warned against by the OP; a
grown man with seeming years of experience who was either too
lazy or too stupid, or both, to be able to tackle and pass exams
that were being taken in their stride by otherwise-unqualified
14-year-olds and went instead for the yellow-bellied coward's
way out by going for exams set for 6-year-olds.

Eric did not seem to understand that the OP was a public stance
for the maintenance of academic standards and that by responding
with his Childish Broadcast (CB) in the way that he did he illustrated
graphically the sort of turnip-brained dross that the OP warned
against.

M3EJO is one of the licences issued under the gangrenous
degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence and by taking out
such a licence, Eric proves himself to be an incurable CBer who
will _NEVER_ make it into the ranks of _REAL_ Radio Hams.

Eric seems to have missed the point that the OP was arguing
in favour of the very acadaemic standards that Eric himself so
dismally failed to reach - the issue is not one of the relevance, or
otherwise, of the Morse Code, but the showing of sufficient dedication
of putting in the necessary effort to get what you want. Going
for an M3/CB Fools' Licence and then posting personal attacks in
the way that Eric did is a sure sign of lack of such dedication.

Eric - you are a stupid boy and should grow up. It may well
be that you wear long trousers but it is certain that your
mind is still in nappies.

Micky Taker wrote:
Pierian Spring wrote:
A number of potential recruits are in great danger of being
misled into thinking that they are Radio Hams when, in fact,
they are nothing of the kind! As it is the season of goodwill,
let us show our goodwill by saving these poor deluded fools
from the mischievous ne-er-do-wells who will attempt to
mislead them. (Radio Hams are technically-motivated people
and not merely turnip-brained button pushers like CBers and
like M3/CBers)

Title's typo corrected.

Pierian Spring wrote:
"Micky Taker" is, in reality,

Eric Williams, M3EJO,
19, Raglans,
Exeter,
EX2 8XN.

He is one of those disgraceful adults warned against by the OP; a
grown man with seeming years of experience who was either too
lazy or too stupid, or both, to be able to tackle and pass exams
that were being taken in their stride by otherwise-unqualified
14-year-olds and went instead for the yellow-bellied coward's
way out by going for exams set for 6-year-olds.

Eric did not seem to understand that the OP was a public stance
for the maintenance of academic standards and that by responding
with his Childish Broadcast (CB) in the way that he did he illustrated
graphically the sort of turnip-brained dross that the OP warned
against.

M3EJO is one of the licences issued under the gangrenous
degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence and by taking out
such a licence, Eric proves himself to be an incurable CBer who
will _NEVER_ make it into the ranks of _REAL_ Radio Hams.

Eric seems to have missed the point that the OP was arguing
in favour of the very acadaemic standards that Eric himself so
dismally failed to reach - the issue is not one of the relevance, or
otherwise, of the Morse Code, but the showing of sufficient dedication
of putting in the necessary effort to get what you want. Going
for an M3/CB Fools' Licence and then posting personal attacks in
the way that Eric did is a sure sign of lack of such dedication.

Eric - you are a stupid boy and should grow up. It may well
be that you wear long trousers but it is certain that your
mind is still in nappies.

Micky Taker wrote:
Pierian Spring wrote:
A number of potential recruits are in great danger of being
misled into thinking that they are Radio Hams when, in fact,
they are nothing of the kind! As it is the season of goodwill,
let us show our goodwill by saving these poor deluded fools
from the mischievous ne-er-do-wells who will attempt to
mislead them. (Radio Hams are technically-motivated people
and not merely turnip-brained button pushers like CBers and
like M3/CBers)

The Childish Broadcast (CB) quoted below would suggest that
the 2 letters, number, 2 letters format used by Britland CB
licences is also in use by Yankland in the KN6 series.....

Frank Dinger's Childish Broadcast (CB) serves to illustrate
well the Trojan Horse of the CBer-Masquerading-As-A-Radio-Ham
warned against by the OP.

Just ignore his outpouring - he is as irrelevant to _REAL_ Ham Radio
as is the RSCB.

Highland Ham wrote:

Just ignore his outpouring

Frank KN6WH / GM0CSZ

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:21:14 -0800, Highland Ham
wrote:

Gareth Alun Evans - G4ASW

Published this message to the Public Domain


G4ASW
M YORKE
8 ST JOHN PLACE
PORT WASHINGTON
NEW YORK 11050
USA
==================
I think , Gareth Evans' callsign is : G4DSW

I don't think so!

:-)))

73 de G3NYY

--
Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com




.....and just the heck is this worth?????

Walt Davidson wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:32:30 GMT, Micky Taker
wrote:


Published this message to the Public Domain

G4ASW

My humble apologies to G4ASW. Don't know where that came from, but I'm
going to play the dyslexia card here. Either that or I was pi**ed.

Regards,

Micky

Pierian Spring wrote:

Going for an M3/CB Fools' Licence and then posting personal attacks in
the way that Eric did is a sure sign of lack of such dedication.

Please quote said personal attack.

Eric - you are a stupid boy and should grow up. It may well
be that you wear long trousers but it is certain that your
mind is still in nappies.

One up to you then, looks like!

Regards

Eric
2E0ECW

"Perversely, the Novice RAE is a higher technical challenge than the
RAE!" - (C) Gareth Alun Evans 1996

But the Novice RAE is no more, and the comment applied to the RAE
as it existed at the time of the Novice RAE.

The comments are not revalidated for the 3-level farce fiasco that
exists today.

Eric 2E0ECW wrote:
"Perversely, the Novice RAE is a higher technical challenge than the
RAE!" - (C) Gareth Alun Evans 1996