Micky Taker wrote:

Gareth ____ _____ - G4ASW

i'm sure g4asw will have something to say !

Micky Taker wrote:

My humble apologies to G4ASW. Don't know where that came from, but I'm
going to play the dyslexia card here. Either that or I was pi**ed.


doh!

mickey taker takes a nose dive.
which is hard to do when flying so low in the first place !

zYYPK, AKA - PAUL KEARNEY EI7GM, wrote:
Micky Taker wrote:


Gareth ____ _____ - G4ASW


i'm sure g4asw will have something to say !


Yes, I posted that through beer-tinted spectacles and realised the
mistake in the cold light of day.

Cheers,

Micky

"Micky Taker" wrote in message
. uk...


Yes, I posted that through beer-tinted spectacles and realised the mistake
in the cold light of day.

No worse than DSP, heat bands, polarised resistors, fettling, slope
detection, big k and
of course, lol...unclear emissions!

tox

Here we go again.......... Blah blah blah blah blah.

"Pierian Spring" wrote in message
oups.com...
If you publish Childish Broadcasts (CB) such as you
do below, then you will be perceived as a CBer.

Ham Radio is a technical pursuit for which it is
important to maintain standards. There is no
bigotry in seeking to maintain educational
standards.

We do ourselves no favours if we associate
with the non-technical turnip-brains.

Grow up, Mike Gathergood!

wrote:
Pierian Spring wrote:
A number of potential recruits are in great danger of being
misled into thinking that they are Radio Hams when, in fact,
they are nothing of the kind! As it is the season of goodwill,
let us show our goodwill by saving these poor deluded fools
from the mischievous ne-er-do-wells who will attempt to
mislead them. (Radio Hams are technically-motivated people
and not merely turnip-brained button pushers like CBers and
like M3/CBers)


The Pierian Spring, from Greek mythology, was a source of inspiration.

I see nothing inspiring in the bigoted drivel you just posted.

73
Mike
G4KFK

Do you cut and paste your messages. Is that how lazy you are.

"Pierian Spring" wrote in message
ups.com...
If you wish to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster (CBer)
then continue to publish Childish Broadcasts (CB) as you
do below.

Ham Radio is a technical pursuit with gentlemanly
traditions, traditions which seem to be lost on you.

Rooooooodney wrote:
You should check into the Liberty Net at 10:00 PM
saturday night (3.955 (+/- 10 kc) A real collection
of crakns, grumpy old men, kooks and weirdoes.
You would fit right in like lime jell-o into a piehole....

No, no, no! You've got it wrong!

That should read "Dah dah dah dah dah", which means "Zero".

So, I suppose you're right in one respect - the useful
contribution that you make to this NG and to _REAL_
Ham Radio is......ZERO!

Epsilon wrote:
Here we go again.......... Blah blah blah blah blah.

If you wish to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster (CBer)
then continue to publish Childish Broadcasts (CB) such as you
do below.

Stupid boy.

Epsilon wrote:
Do you cut and paste your messages. Is that how lazy you are.

Sorry - somehow lost the cross-posted groups!

Pierian Spring wrote:
Apart from the gratuitous abuse in the last line quoted below,
you have forgottne very quickly your remark, "About sums you
up - old views, old world, just old..... "

You are so habituated by insulting and childish outbursts
that you assume it to be normal adult behaviour - it isn't.

As to your farce of an apology - as I remember it - it
was disingenuous - blaming me for your own social
maladjustments and was followed almost
immediately by further rudeness.

You don't realise that you're doing it, for which reason
you are a bad example to youngsters and therefore
should not be employed in _ANY_ capacity in _ANY
school.



Leigh Preece wrote:

What insulting remark? I haven't made any recent remarks and, for past
remarks, you surely remember my public apology?

He just hates it when he can't return the volley when challenged!

Oops, I seem to have lost the other groups again.

Sorted!

Pierian Spring responded with justifiable indignation to LEIGH PREECE:
Oh, I almost forgot your criminal breaches of
the Telecommunications Act, the Forgery Act,
and the Malicious Communications Act wherein
you forged grossly offensive postings to the Internet
that purported to have come from me.

No, I don't think that you should work in schools.

Pierian Spring wrote:
You yourself published the remarks quoted below by repeating
them in the post which I quoted below. If you do not believe
them to be true, why did you repeat them?

My opinion of you which has been caused by your own
one-sided campaign of vituperative bile, was brought
about by your obsession with me, your habituation with
the publishing of infantile and grossly offensive
comments, your cowardly use of pseudonyms behind
from which to further vent your spleen, your admission of guilt
by an apology (after which you continued to be abusive and
trying to justify your abuse thereby calling into question your
sincerity), and your attempts to justify your infantile outbursts,
is that you are of an immature, anti-social and maladjusted
personality that is a disgustingly poor example to give to
children and which means that you are a danger to children
and should not be employed in _ANY_ capacity in _ANY_ school.

Your childish outbursts and my indignant responses to them have
occurred
entirely within the public forum of this NG. If there are any issues
arising therefrom, then this NG is the place to raise them, entirely
open and above board. I see no reason to run away and hide in
a cowardly fashion in an email discourse. This very-public situation
has come about entirely by your own action, and it is a sign of your
continuing infantility that you wish to suppress public criticism of
yourself and your public childishness.

Try growing up.