Pierian Spring wrote:
[snip]
I advise anybody to remain anonymous

As in getting yourself arrested, and your name and picture published in
your local newspaper..thus bringing amateur radio into disrepute, is
that what you version of anonymous is ?

http://archive.thisiswiltshire.co.uk.../10/91923.html

Me wrote:
As in getting yourself arrested, and your name and picture published in
your local newspaper..thus bringing amateur radio into disrepute, is
that what you version of anonymous is ?

Maybe a clean CRB check should be a pre-requisite for an amateur radio
licence?

73
Mike G4KFK

I see that some cowardly child has hidden behind an
anonymising server to forge an abusive posting that did not come from
me.

What more proof do we need that the dumbing down that
has come in from, amongst other things, the gangrenous
degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence, has
done irreparable harm to the society of Radio Hams?

In the light of the forged posting below, it is more and more
important that _ALL_ self-respecting _REAL_ Radio Hams
resign forthwith from the RSCB, if only to show support
for decency and for civilised behaviour in Radio Hammery.

Pierian Spring wrote:
However as it's Christmas, please feel free to join me at my run down QTH
for a spot of meths!

Pierian Spring wrote:
I don't follow web links - if you have something valid
to contribute to a discussion in this NG - possibly
your address and telephone number, then contribute it,
or else be for ever dismissed as a cowardly child.

If it was your intention to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster
(CBer),
and deliberately setting out to cause offence is most certainly
childish, then continue with your Childish Broadcasting (CB) such
as you use below.

Grow up, Galen Watts!

Stupid child.

W8LNA wrote:
I got news for ya chappie, the war's over, you can get those parts for
your head now.
Yeah, yeah, I know, 'stupid boy.'
You need some new material, and maybe some vitamin C tabs, ya been
suckin' limes* so long you're sour completely through.
*- Apologies to all the British possibly offended by this remark with
the exception of G4SDW, who it was intended to offend.

At no time have I indicated that I wasn't prepared to
tackle something of which I had no experience. I was
prepared to tackle it, and was awaiting the appropriate
instructions. How many of those who boast of having
neutralised the PA stage of an FT101 did so without
the manufacturer's instructions thereto, and if they
lacked the instructions, how did they know that their
attempts to so neutralise were successful?

You really do seem desperate to score some
infantile point, Andy GilFillan!

DrBoris wrote:
"Pierian Spring" wrote in message
oups.com...
crap snipped
I wouldn't recommend anyone whose background
is in transistorised QRP to tackle the neutralising of a compact
PA stage with 600 VDC on the anodes after replacing the
antenna coupling capacitor unadvisedly, lightly, or wantonly.
So how are people supposed to learn/progress if they are not
going to tackle something they have no previous experience of?
Is that not the whole point of Ham Radio, as you seem to continually
remind us of in your FAQ?

If it is your wish to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster (CBer)
then just carry right on with your Childish Broadcasting (CB)
such as you utter below.

You do yourslef no favours by your continual use of
gratuitous and abusive outbursts.

Grow up, Mike Gathergood!

Stupid boy.

wrote:
Pierian Spring wrote:
However as it's Christmas, please feel free to join me at my run down QTH
for a spot of meths!
That's a very kind offer and, as it happens, we will be visiting
friends in Canal Road over the hols, so I might well take you up on the
offer.
It it BYOB? Should I bring my own anti-freeze?
Merry CHRISTmas
Mike G4KFK
www.g4kfk.co.uk

Firstly, why not identify yourself, rather than hiding like the
infantile coward that you undoubtedly are behind an
anonymising server? (Talking of infantile anonymous
cowards, have you ever thought about joining the
plods yourself?)

Secondly, if anyone is arrested as the result of a malicious
and perjurous complaint, then that arrest, and any corresponding
bringing of Ham Radio into disrepute, is a reflection on the
criminal making the complaint, in this case, Brian Reay, G8OSN/M3OSN,
and not on his unfortunate victim.

Brian Reay subjected me to a vicious, malicious and distressing
campaign of harassment over a number of years when he
repeatedly accused me of sheep-shagging, said that my
wife was a sheep in the bed next to me, and accused
me of drinking methylated spirit. I did not respond to him
other than to chastise him for his grossly offensive behaviour.

When it became apparent that Brian Reay was a schoolteacher,
and had been conducting his sexually deviant campaign when
he was under training at a girls's school in Dartford, Kent,
I responded by suggesting that such a campaign meant that
he was a danger to children. Brian Reay's infantile psyche
could not deal with having the tables turned on him, and
he made a perjurous and malicious complaint to the plods
suggesting that it was I who was harassing him, rather than
the other way about. Brian Reay is a w*nkmason and it seems that
his fellow w*nkmasons in the plods will not take action against him
for wasting plod time in the way that he did.

Me wrote:
Pierian Spring wrote:
[snip]
I advise anybody to remain anonymous

As in getting yourself arrested, and your name and picture published in
your local newspaper..thus bringing amateur radio into disrepute, is
that what you version of anonymous is ?

http://archive.thisiswiltshire.co.uk.../10/91923.html

Pierian Spring wrote:
If it was your intention to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster
(CBer),
and deliberately setting out to cause offence is most certainly
childish, then continue with your Childish Broadcasting (CB) such
as you use below.

Grow up, Galen Watts!

Bullseye!

Gee, he can use a call sign lookup page, I'm really, really scared!

Maybe I should file a report with the Melksham police.

I'd bet they know who you are, Springy Ol' boy.

What's more childish, a casual insult across the internet or actually
going far enough to get arrested for intimidation across the internet?

I suspect the latter.


W8LNA
Galen Watts
HC 63 Box 309
Arbovale, WV 24915-9741

If anyone is arrested as the result of a malicious
and perjurous complaint, then that arrest, and any corresponding
bringing of Ham Radio into disrepute, is a reflection on the
criminal making the complaint, in this case, Brian Reay, G8OSN/M3OSN,
and not on his unfortunate victim.

Brian Reay subjected me to a vicious, malicious and distressing
campaign of harassment over a number of years when he
repeatedly accused me of sheep-shagging, said that my
wife was a sheep in the bed next to me, and accused
me of drinking methylated spirit. I did not respond to him
other than to chastise him for his grossly offensive behaviour.

When it became apparent that Brian Reay was a schoolteacher,
and had been conducting his sexually deviant campaign when
he was under training at a girls's school in Dartford, Kent,
I responded by suggesting that such a campaign meant that
he was a danger to children. Brian Reay's infantile psyche
could not deal with having the tables turned on him, and
he made a perjurous and malicious complaint to the plods
suggesting that it was I who was harassing him, rather than
the other way about. Brian Reay is a w*nkmason and it seems that
his fellow w*nkmasons in the plods will not take action against him
for wasting plod time in the way that he did.

If it was your intention to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster
(CBer), and deliberately setting out to cause offence is most
certainly childish, then continue with your Childish Broadcasting
(CB) such as you use below.

Grow up, Galen Watts!

Stupid child.

W8LNA wrote:
Bullseye!
Gee, he can use a call sign lookup page, I'm really, really scared!
Maybe I should file a report with the Melksham police.
I'd bet they know who you are, Springy Ol' boy.
What's more childish, a casual insult across the internet or actually
going far enough to get arrested for intimidation across the internet?
I suspect the latter.

Pierian Spring wrote:
If it is your wish to be perceived as a Childish Broadcaster (CBer)
then just carry right on with your Childish Broadcasting (CB)
such as you utter below.

You do yourslef no favours by your continual use of
gratuitous and abusive outbursts.

Grow up, Mike Gathergood!

Stupid boy.

Go on then - you drink that meths all by yourself. See if I care.

That's the last time I accept an invitation for a boys night out with
you!

73
Mike G4KFK