K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are
lawyers

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i
have posted is a true

Steve, K4YZ

an Old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are
lawyers

Uh huh.

Right.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i
have posted is a true

No...What you stated was ludicrous. Not unexpected, but ludicrous
nonetheless.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an Old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are
lawyers

Uh huh.

Right.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i
have posted is a true

No...What you stated was ludicrous. Not unexpected, but ludicrous
nonetheless.

you consider the turth ludicrous? well we already knew that

Steve, K4YZ

On 10 Jan 2006 12:04:50 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning you know I am right and you were just floaming me for fun

Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 12:04:50 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning you know I am right and you were just floaming me for fun

"floaming" you, Markie...?!?! For fun...?!?! I don't even know
what "floaming" is, so how can I know if I am doing it for fun or not?

Steve, K4YZ

On 10 Jan 2006 13:16:48 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 12:04:50 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning you know I am right and you were just floaming me for fun

"floaming" you, Markie...?!?! For fun...?!?! I don't even know
what "floaming" is, so how can I know if I am doing it for fun or not?

you should know if you are having fun

Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print

Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your
posts, eh, Brain?

In any case, the article mentioned the likelyhood of not being
able to enforce this, however it will be interesting to see if any case
law is developed from it in the near future.

It also suggested the likelyhood that anonymous tipsters might be
detered by this law. I doubt it. However I also believe that if you
have a complaint to make, there's more strength in standing up for what
you believe in and putting your name on it rather than slinging mud
from behind anonymity.

If you don't have the strength of conviction of your own words to
put your name behind them, why make them?

73

Steve, K4YZ

Even if you use your name doesn't mean you get to stalk people, even if
you believe in stalking.

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print

Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your
posts, eh, Brain?

he does

No, he does not.

I challenge you to find ONE "hot-ham-and-cheese" post wherein he's
signed his name and/or callsign to it.

A callsign is not a name. MARS is not Amateur Radio.

K4YZ wrote:

No...it's not. It's a 'nickname'.

No. It isn't. It's an alias.

A signature is his NAME.

No. It isn't. My name appears in many places where it is not a
signature.

The one mumsy and pops gave him.

My parents did not give me a signature. I had to develop that on my
own.

Unless his parents were really insensitive, I bet his real name is
NOT "hot-ham-and-cheese"

At least my parents spell my name correctly.

you should look the arist curently known as prince but once had to be
called the arist formerly known as prince becuase he made his in to a
suqigle

That was a publicity ploy.

The courts still require his given name on all documents.

No. They don't. A legal alias or "doing business as" allows an alias
to be used legally.

Sonovagun!

I respond to your posts either with " or
"

No. You don't. You responded under your boy friend's account. Once.

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

No...it's not. It's a 'nickname'.

No. It isn't. It's an alias.

A signature is his NAME.

No. It isn't. My name appears in many places where it is not a
signature.

The one mumsy and pops gave him.

My parents did not give me a signature. I had to develop that on my
own.

Unless his parents were really insensitive, I bet his real name is
NOT "hot-ham-and-cheese"

At least my parents spell my name correctly.

you should look the arist curently known as prince but once had to be
called the arist formerly known as prince becuase he made his in to a
suqigle

That was a publicity ploy.

The courts still require his given name on all documents.

No. They don't. A legal alias or "doing business as" allows an alias
to be used legally.

Sonovagun!

I respond to your posts either with " or
"

No. You don't. You responded under your boy friend's account. Once.

And MARS is not amateur radio.