Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:45:12 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: wrote: after all mularkie is **** so your posts More Markie Mulakie might as well be titled More markie **** as far as I am concerned Id send back mail as obsense or harrasing if it had the word mularkie on the outside of it and post office would in time charge with using the us mail ilegaly if you contiued to send it The word is spelled "malarkey". Look it up. After digesting your steaming portion of crow, you might let me know how foolish you feel. Dave K8MN note that steve have been making many mispelling the word in question and that is ok with Dave but if I do it keeping to steve's spelling, one he has used more than 300times since dec 2005 looking up at the titles and seing the number 317 by the title more markie mularkie ( I frankly don't know or care how to spell the word I choose to use a a word I can spell more of often than not) it becomes an issue soe much for Dave bhaving any claim to being fair and it tends to show that dave only cares about mispeling when comited by folks he don't like _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:45:12 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: after all mularkie is **** so your posts More Markie Mulakie might as well be titled More markie **** as far as I am concerned Id send back mail as obsense or harrasing if it had the word mularkie on the outside of it and post office would in time charge with using the us mail ilegaly if you contiued to send it The word is spelled "malarkey". Look it up. After digesting your steaming portion of crow, you might let me know how foolish you feel. Dave K8MN note that steve have been making many mispelling the word in question and that is ok with Dave but if I do it keeping to steve's spelling, one he has used more than 300times since dec 2005 looking up at the titles and seing the number 317 by the title more markie mularkie ( I frankly don't know or care how to spell the word I choose to use a a word I can spell more of often than not) it becomes an issue soe much for Dave bhaving any claim to being fair and it tends to show that dave only cares about mispeling when comited by folks he don't like You should have left it alone, Mark. why? You've both misspelled the word. but you only cared when I did it Spelling isn't the issue. why did you bring it up then The issues are that 1) you didn't bother to look up the word and why should I? 2) that you charged right in accusing Steve of using a profanity by using the word which in know way signifies a profanity. I decide when something is profanity (for me) nice of you to try to deny again my civil rights Dave K8MN |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:45:12 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: after all mularkie is **** so your posts More Markie Mulakie might as well be titled More markie **** as far as I am concerned Id send back mail as obsense or harrasing if it had the word mularkie on the outside of it and post office would in time charge with using the us mail ilegaly if you contiued to send it The word is spelled "malarkey". Look it up. After digesting your steaming portion of crow, you might let me know how foolish you feel. Dave K8MN note that steve have been making many mispelling the word in question and that is ok with Dave but if I do it keeping to steve's spelling, one he has used more than 300times since dec 2005 looking up at the titles and seing the number 317 by the title more markie mularkie ( I frankly don't know or care how to spell the word I choose to use a a word I can spell more of often than not) it becomes an issue soe much for Dave bhaving any claim to being fair and it tends to show that dave only cares about mispeling when comited by folks he don't like You should have left it alone, Mark. why? That's your usual mode of operation--asking the question when the answers appear just below it. You've both misspelled the word. but you only cared when I did it Incorrect. I've pointed out that you both misspelled it. Only you didn't know the meaning of the word. Spelling isn't the issue. why did you bring it up then So you'd know and would be able to look up the word. The issues are that 1) you didn't bother to look up the word and why should I? So you wouldn't make a complete ass of yourself. It is too late to change that now. 2) that you charged right in accusing Steve of using a profanity by using the word which in know way signifies a profanity. I decide when something is profanity (for me) No, Mark, you don't. nice of you to try to deny again my civil rights You're a perpetual victim and a dolt. There's your civil rights. Dave K8MN |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:45:12 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: after all mularkie is **** so your posts More Markie Mulakie might as well be titled More markie **** as far as I am concerned Id send back mail as obsense or harrasing if it had the word mularkie on the outside of it and post office would in time charge with using the us mail ilegaly if you contiued to send it The word is spelled "malarkey". Look it up. After digesting your steaming portion of crow, you might let me know how foolish you feel. Dave K8MN note that steve have been making many mispelling the word in question and that is ok with Dave but if I do it keeping to steve's spelling, one he has used more than 300times since dec 2005 looking up at the titles and seing the number 317 by the title more markie mularkie ( I frankly don't know or care how to spell the word I choose to use a a word I can spell more of often than not) it becomes an issue soe much for Dave bhaving any claim to being fair and it tends to show that dave only cares about mispeling when comited by folks he don't like You should have left it alone, Mark. why? That's your usual mode of operation--asking the question when the why do you post and do everything but stay on the topic why was I flamed and not steve it is clearly a double standard why? do you have the guts to answer I bet not |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:45:12 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: after all mularkie is **** so your posts More Markie Mulakie might as well be titled More markie **** as far as I am concerned Id send back mail as obsense or harrasing if it had the word mularkie on the outside of it and post office would in time charge with using the us mail ilegaly if you contiued to send it The word is spelled "malarkey". Look it up. After digesting your steaming portion of crow, you might let me know how foolish you feel. Dave K8MN note that steve have been making many mispelling the word in question and that is ok with Dave but if I do it keeping to steve's spelling, one he has used more than 300times since dec 2005 looking up at the titles and seing the number 317 by the title more markie mularkie ( I frankly don't know or care how to spell the word I choose to use a a word I can spell more of often than not) it becomes an issue soe much for Dave bhaving any claim to being fair and it tends to show that dave only cares about mispeling when comited by folks he don't like You should have left it alone, Mark. why? That's your usual mode of operation--asking the question when the why do you post and do everything but stay on the topic read up the screen. See what was under discussion. Read my comments. Note how they follow that discussion. In other words, you're simply wrong. why was I flamed and not steve it is clearly a double standard why? do you have the guts to answer I bet not You bet wrong. All of the questions you asked were previously answered. See the portions where you did not bother to look up the word and where you claimed that the word means something which it plainly does not mean. It is evident that 1) the material zoomed right over your pointy head or 2) you chose to ignore it in favor of continuing your rant. Either way, you look stupid. Dave K8MN |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:14:23 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:45:12 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: after all mularkie is **** so your posts More Markie Mulakie might as well be titled More markie **** as far as I am concerned Id send back mail as obsense or harrasing if it had the word mularkie on the outside of it and post office would in time charge with using the us mail ilegaly if you contiued to send it The word is spelled "malarkey". Look it up. After digesting your steaming portion of crow, you might let me know how foolish you feel. Dave K8MN note that steve have been making many mispelling the word in question and that is ok with Dave but if I do it keeping to steve's spelling, one he has used more than 300times since dec 2005 looking up at the titles and seing the number 317 by the title more markie mularkie ( I frankly don't know or care how to spell the word I choose to use a a word I can spell more of often than not) it becomes an issue soe much for Dave bhaving any claim to being fair and it tends to show that dave only cares about mispeling when comited by folks he don't like You should have left it alone, Mark. why? That's your usual mode of operation--asking the question when the why do you post and do everything but stay on the topic read up the screen. See what was under discussion. Read my comments. Note how they follow that discussion. In other words, you're simply wrong. no I am not wrong not at all worng I pointed our your doubele standard and ask you to explain why I should not point it out your post have not addresed those issues why was I flamed and not steve it is clearly a double standard why? do you have the guts to answer I bet not You bet wrong. All of the questions you asked were previously answered. See the portions where you did not bother to look up the word and where you claimed that the word means something which it plainly does not mean. It is evident that 1) the material zoomed right over your pointy head or 2) you chose to ignore it in favor of continuing your rant. Either way, you look stupid. no answers there dave no answer to why it was fine with for stev to mispell a word more than 300 hunderd times and you pounce on me for doing it once you sir a re lying about your actions becuase you lack the cowarage to tell the truth the truth you do have a double standard you dislike me and like steve therefore you treat steve differently than me but I guess since that answer the truth or close to it is not in your version of PC you choose to lie about but you do have a double standard and the longer you contiue to avoid that truth inyour writing the more you make yourself look like a lying coward, which is fine by me since I am convinced that is exactly what you are Dave K8MN _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:14:23 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:45:12 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: after all mularkie is **** so your posts More Markie Mulakie might as well be titled More markie **** as far as I am concerned Id send back mail as obsense or harrasing if it had the word mularkie on the outside of it and post office would in time charge with using the us mail ilegaly if you contiued to send it The word is spelled "malarkey". Look it up. After digesting your steaming portion of crow, you might let me know how foolish you feel. Dave K8MN note that steve have been making many mispelling the word in question and that is ok with Dave but if I do it keeping to steve's spelling, one he has used more than 300times since dec 2005 looking up at the titles and seing the number 317 by the title more markie mularkie ( I frankly don't know or care how to spell the word I choose to use a a word I can spell more of often than not) it becomes an issue soe much for Dave bhaving any claim to being fair and it tends to show that dave only cares about mispeling when comited by folks he don't like You should have left it alone, Mark. why? That's your usual mode of operation--asking the question when the why do you post and do everything but stay on the topic read up the screen. See what was under discussion. Read my comments. Note how they follow that discussion. In other words, you're simply wrong. no I am not wrong not at all worng I pointed our your doubele standard and ask you to explain why I should not point it out your post have not addresed those issues why was I flamed and not steve it is clearly a double standard why? do you have the guts to answer I bet not You bet wrong. All of the questions you asked were previously answered. See the portions where you did not bother to look up the word and where you claimed that the word means something which it plainly does not mean. It is evident that 1) the material zoomed right over your pointy head or 2) you chose to ignore it in favor of continuing your rant. Either way, you look stupid. no answers there dave no answer to why it was fine with for stev to mispell a word more than 300 hunderd times and you pounce on me for doing it once you sir a re lying about your actions becuase you lack the cowarage to tell the truth the truth you do have a double standard you dislike me and like steve therefore you treat steve differently than me but I guess since that answer the truth or close to it is not in your version of PC you choose to lie about but you do have a double standard and the longer you contiue to avoid that truth inyour writing the more you make yourself look like a lying coward, which is fine by me since I am convinced that is exactly what you are You're done on this thread, Colonel. If you are mentally incapable of rational discussion, I won't continue. Dave K8MN |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:14:23 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: cut and the longer you contiue to avoid that truth inyour writing the more you make yourself look like a lying coward, which is fine by me since I am convinced that is exactly what you are You're done on this thread, Colonel. If you are mentally incapable of rational discussion, I won't continue. Dave you never started on this thread but I hope you uphold your promise I doubt it though calling your mentaly ill is a pretty low road but you do employ a doubel standard and you are not man enough to admit to it you make that plain for evryone to see Dave K8MN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Proof of Stevie Double Standard, if proof were really needed | Policy | |||
FS: Vertex Standard VXA-210 Pilot, airband handheld transciever | Equipment | |||
FS: Vertex Standard VXA-210 Pilot, airband handheld transciever | Swap | |||
my Yahoo Group..Earlshamradio..some interesting homebrew/ant/component discussion | Homebrew | |||
my Yahoo Group..Earlshamradio..some interesting homebrew/ant/component discussion | Homebrew |