N9OGL wrote:
From K4YZ Mon Jan 30 10:22:40 2006
X-Apparently-To:
via 68.142.201.204; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:23:06
-0800
X-Originating-IP:
[216.239.56.131]
Return-Path:

Authentication-Results:
mta214.mail.scd.yahoo.com from=aol.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received:
from 216.239.56.131 (EHLO mproxy.googlegroups.com) (216.239.56.131)
by mta214.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:23:06 -0800
Received:
by mproxy.googlegroups.com with SMTP id 11so5812979cwu for
; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:23:06 -0800 (PST)
Received:
by 10.11.53.23 with SMTP id b23mr173528cwa; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:22:40
-0800 (PST)
Received:
from 64.12.116.10 by g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Mon, 30
Jan 2006 18:22:40 +0000 (UTC)
From:
"K4YZ" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To:
"N9OGL"
Subject:
DIRT ON STEVE NOT WORTH $50
Date:
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:22:40 -0800
Message-ID:
.com
In-Reply-To:

References:

User-Agent:
G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent:
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT
5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via:
HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/1.0.6 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 Turboweb
[mtc-te033 8.3.5], HTTP/1.0 cache-mtc-aa06.proxy.aol.com[400C740A]
(Traffic-Server/5.4.2 [uScM])
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Length:
849

N9OGL wrote:
I still think about pay price they have at
http://img353.imageshack.us/img353/8...robeson1sl.gif and put
info
on my blog. DON'T GET ME PISED OFF AGAIN STEVE OR ELSE I DO IT!

Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh!

About 30 seconds later I am on my way to file personal complaints
IN TAYLORVILLE that include your porno sites, etc with Taylorville City
PD.

Then I stop at every church and synagogue within 100 miles of
Taylorville and drop some of your more colorful posts and pro-porno
ravings. I'll provide them your picture, your family name and address,
and your business "on the square" in Taylorville

Maybe I'll also stop in at the office where your PRESENT ISP is
located and have a chat with them, too!

So...Send the fifty bucks, Toiddie, and let the games begin!

Steve, K4YZ

Todd forward this to cops and FBI

they will do nothing about it, for Now

you want it on file if he carries though on this threat

second decide how much trouble the ass is worth
if you are going to do it do it and make a note about how esay it is
to find out stuff online as you do
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
From K4YZ Mon Jan 30 10:22:40 2006
X-Apparently-To:
via 68.142.201.204; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:23:06
-0800
X-Originating-IP:
[216.239.56.131]
Return-Path:

Authentication-Results:
mta214.mail.scd.yahoo.com from=aol.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received:
from 216.239.56.131 (EHLO mproxy.googlegroups.com) (216.239.56.131)
by mta214.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:23:06 -0800
Received:
by mproxy.googlegroups.com with SMTP id 11so5812979cwu for
; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:23:06 -0800 (PST)
Received:
by 10.11.53.23 with SMTP id b23mr173528cwa; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:22:40
-0800 (PST)
Received:
from 64.12.116.10 by g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Mon, 30
Jan 2006 18:22:40 +0000 (UTC)
From:
"K4YZ" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To:
"N9OGL"
Subject:
DIRT ON STEVE NOT WORTH $50
Date:
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:22:40 -0800
Message-ID:
.com
In-Reply-To:

References:

User-Agent:
G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent:
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT
5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via:
HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/1.0.6 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 Turboweb
[mtc-te033 8.3.5], HTTP/1.0 cache-mtc-aa06.proxy.aol.com[400C740A]
(Traffic-Server/5.4.2 [uScM])
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Length:
849

N9OGL wrote:
I still think about pay price they have at
http://img353.imageshack.us/img353/8...robeson1sl.gif and put
info
on my blog. DON'T GET ME PISED OFF AGAIN STEVE OR ELSE I DO IT!

Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh!

About 30 seconds later I am on my way to file personal complaints
IN TAYLORVILLE that include your porno sites, etc with Taylorville City
PD.

Then I stop at every church and synagogue within 100 miles of
Taylorville and drop some of your more colorful posts and pro-porno
ravings. I'll provide them your picture, your family name and address,
and your business "on the square" in Taylorville

Maybe I'll also stop in at the office where your PRESENT ISP is
located and have a chat with them, too!

So...Send the fifty bucks, Toiddie, and let the games begin!

Steve, K4YZ

Todd forward this to cops and FBI

they will do nothing about it, for Now

you want it on file if he carries though on this threat

second decide how much trouble the ass is worth
if you are going to do it do it and make a note about how esay it is
to find out stuff online as you do

Markie, Toad and you are already being watched by the cops and the FBI.
You don't really want that "extra attention" do you, hmmmmmmmm?????

Go back to ****ing NIM Busters where you ****ing belong, and BTFW you
****ing dalek voice SUCK!!!!!!!!

wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

SNIP

Todd forward this to cops and FBI

they will do nothing about it, for Now

you want it on file if he carries though on this threat

second decide how much trouble the ass is worth
if you are going to do it do it and make a note about how esay it is
to find out stuff online as you do

Yeah, Toiddie...go ahead and send this to the cops and the FBI.

SEND them a big red flag that says "I Am An Idiot And This Proves
It".

Markie, the LAST thing Toiddie wants to do is send ANYthing to ANY
law enforcement agency that even remotely rubs HIS misdeeds in their
noses, and that's EXACTLY what will happen!

Toiddie's bragging about his kiddie porn sites, his blatant hatred
and disrespect for law enforcement at all levels, and his wanton
flaunting of his violations of numerous federal laws and regulations is
the LAST thing he needs!

Steve, K4YZ

Toiddie's bragging about his kiddie porn sites, his blatant hatred
and disrespect for law enforcement at all levels, and his wanton
flaunting of his violations of numerous federal laws and regulations is
the LAST thing he needs!

Steve I don't have a Kiddy Porn site, I have a Japanese Animation site.
BIGGGGGGGGGG Difference. Secondly I've never been disrespectful towards
law enforcement I don't know where your getting that from, and this
wanton violation of federal law which you have yet to prove is also
firvious.

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL wrote:
Toiddie's bragging about his kiddie porn sites, his blatant hatred
and disrespect for law enforcement at all levels, and his wanton
flaunting of his violations of numerous federal laws and regulations is
the LAST thing he needs!

Steve I don't have a Kiddy Porn site, I have a Japanese Animation site.

That portrays prepubescent characters participating in adult-like
sex acts.

BIGGGGGGGGGG Difference.

Keep telling yourself that, Toiddie.

Secondly I've never been disrespectful towards
law enforcement I don't know where your getting that from

I get if FROM you, including the 2 billion times you've used the
"F" word in reference to FAA and FCC personnel. I also have several
posts of yours wherein you suggested local LE personnel were ####ing
idiots, along with several other socially disrespectful things to say
about them.

and this
wanton violation of federal law which you have yet to prove is also
firvious.

"frivilous"

I don't need to prove anything.

YOU are the one who bragged about flying an illegally modified
ultralight.

There's nothing "frivilous" about flying an illegally modified
aircraft, even if it is "only" Part 103.

Steve, K4YZ

That portrays prepubescent characters participating in adult-like
sex acts.

The problem is though, the vast majority of Anime Characters that are
out there (and there is a LOT) look as though they are underaged. there
is really nothing in anime to determine how old an anime character is.
In Anime a character may look ten years old but in fact could really be
twenty, and vice a versa. An to answer something from something you say
on another thread about "where there's smoke there's fire" (whatever
you mean by that) does not necessary hold truth. The material on my
website falls into the category of "virtual porn" Virtual porn and
child porn is legal in the United states. Child Porn is legal, the part
that makes it illegal is the process on how it's created (the sexual
abuse of children) (Feber V California US Supreme Court 1973) Virtual
child porn is VERY legal on the grounds that the children are created
from someone imagination, and thus no sexual abuse of a real child.
(Ashcroft v FSC, US Supreme Court 2003) The Government in it arguments
in Ashcroft v. FSC argued that although no real children was harmed in
the creation of it, children could be incised by the pictures, the US
Supreme court throw that argument out as well on the grounds that there
was no evidence to link virtual child porn to real sexual abuse. The
Supreme Court also stated that if there was a big demand from virtual
child porn for pedophile then the demand for he real stuff wouldn't be
in such high demand. In other REAL Child Porn lover look for the real
stuff, not the animated stuff.


I get if FROM you, including the 2 billion times you've used the
"F" word in reference to FAA and FCC personnel. I also have several
posts of yours wherein you suggested local LE personnel were ####ing
idiots, along with several other socially disrespectful things to say
about them.

First off I don't remember using the F word when it came to the FAA,
now the FCC, that I would vouch for...and the FCC is well aware of how
I think of them, long before you. As for local Law Enforcement you'll
have to refresh my memory. The Vast majority of the time on these
newsgroups I'm bashing one group....I take it back three groups, The
FCC, ARRL and the NAB. I've also been known to throw punches at the
RIAA and MPAA.

I don't need to prove anything.

The point is steve I have the right to get on here and bash a
government agency, that is protected by the Constitution. Second
without actually proof that I did what I said I did on here then it
basically falls under the same category as here say which is NOT
uphold-able in a court of law. That's why the FCC wouldn't do ****,
unless they have actually proof that I'm doing something illegal they
aren't going to do anything same-thing with FAA unless they have
actually proof that I was fly they can't do ****. you have to have
actual evidence to prove that I violated Federal Law.

YOU are the one who bragged about flying an illegally modified
ultralight.

Bragging about doing something dose not necessary mean he did it.

Todd N9OGL

On 30 Jan 2006 16:24:30 -0800, N9OGL wrote:
That portrays prepubescent characters participating in adult-like
sex acts.

The problem is though, the vast majority of Anime Characters that are
out there (and there is a LOT) look as though they are underaged. there
is really nothing in anime to determine how old an anime character is.
In Anime a character may look ten years old but in fact could really be

I couldn't believe it, but you actually handed Steve's ass to him, Todd.
You chewed him up and spit him out. Good work.

N9OGL wrote:
That portrays prepubescent characters participating in adult-like
sex acts.

The problem is though, the vast majority of Anime Characters that are
out there (and there is a LOT) look as though they are underaged. there
is really nothing in anime to determine how old an anime character is...(SNIP)

Rationalization, Toiddie. Pure rationalization.

High pitched voices, immature reactions. Child-like mannerisms.

Now tell me again about determining the "age" of your "characters"

I get if FROM you, including the 2 billion times you've used the
"F" word in reference to FAA and FCC personnel. I also have several
posts of yours wherein you suggested local LE personnel were ####ing
idiots, along with several other socially disrespectful things to say
about them.

First off I don't remember using the F word when it came to the FAA...(SNIP)

Guess you have the same sobriety and memory issues that Markie
does.

(UNSNIP)...now the FCC, that I would vouch for...and the FCC is well aware of how
I think of them, long before you. As for local Law Enforcement you'll
have to refresh my memory. The Vast majority of the time on these
newsgroups I'm bashing one group....I take it back three groups, The
FCC, ARRL and the NAB. I've also been known to throw punches at the
RIAA and MPAA.

Most of which are due to each of those agencies expecting you to
play by the same rules everyone else does and act your age.

Obvioulsy a deficiency of your upbrining.

I don't need to prove anything.

The point is steve I have the right to get on here and bash a
government agency, that is protected by the Constitution.

Our Forefathers created these documents not to give citizens a
forum to "bash" anyone, but to put checks and balances on those powers
that men tend to corrupt.

You're just acting like a third grade brat who isn't getting to
play instead of do his homework.

Second
without actually proof that I did what I said I did on here then it
basically falls under the same category as here say which is NOT
uphold-able in a court of law.

It's archived, Toiddie.

Case law has already substantiated the validity of entering these
records into court proceedings.

That's why the FCC wouldn't do ####,
unless they have actually proof that I'm doing something illegal they
aren't going to do anything same-thing with FAA unless they have
actually proof that I was fly they can't do ####. you have to have
actual evidence to prove that I violated Federal Law.

We have YOUR admission that you're operating an illegally modified
ultralight in Google archives.

YOU are the one who bragged about flying an illegally modified
ultralight.

Bragging about doing something dose not necessary mean he did it.

But you've since admitted you've "been flying".

Busted. By your own words.

Steve, K4YZ

An Anymouse wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006 16:24:30 -0800, N9OGL wrote:
That portrays prepubescent characters participating in adult-like
sex acts.

The problem is though, the vast majority of Anime Characters that are
out there (and there is a LOT) look as though they are underaged. there
is really nothing in anime to determine how old an anime character is.
In Anime a character may look ten years old but in fact could really be

I couldn't believe it, but you actually handed Steve's ### to him, Todd.
You chewed him up and spit him out. Good work.

Oh?

Where?

Steve, K4YZ