Under 47 CFR Sec. 1.945, pertaining to license grants for
authorizations in the Private Radio Services, subparagraph (c) sets
forth the findings necessary for the Commission to grant the
application in question without a hearing, and subparagraph (f) states
that the Commission has to designate the application for a hearing if
it can't make the findings contained in subparagraph (c). Assume that
an amateur appllies for renewal of his license and the Private Radio
Bureau "offlines" it, which is tantamount to saying that the Commission
cannot make the findings contained in subparagraph (c), and takes no
action on it for an extended period of time. How long does the
Commission have to sit on the application before designating it for a
hearing under subparagraph (f)? And what provision of law imposes that
time limit?

wrote:
Under 47 CFR Sec. 1.945, pertaining to license grants for
authorizations in the Private Radio Services, subparagraph (c) sets
forth the findings necessary for the Commission to grant the
application in question without a hearing, and subparagraph (f) states
that the Commission has to designate the application for a hearing if
it can't make the findings contained in subparagraph (c). Assume that
an amateur appllies for renewal of his license and the Private Radio
Bureau "offlines" it, which is tantamount to saying that the Commission
cannot make the findings contained in subparagraph (c), and takes no
action on it for an extended period of time. How long does the
Commission have to sit on the application before designating it for a
hearing under subparagraph (f)? And what provision of law imposes that
time limit?

Depends. What did you do?

wrote:
wrote:
Under 47 CFR Sec. 1.945, pertaining to license grants for
cut for brevity
hearing under subparagraph (f)? And what provision of law imposes that
time limit?

Depends. What did you do?

I think the refference is storuous avoidance refing to the case of
K1MAN without naming him

and f so I frankly agree that a case for him to file an action in
federal court for releif from this state of affiars but he needsto do
not rant though spokemen in RRAP

On 26 Mar 2006 18:50:36 -0800, wrote:

Look, why don't you either just admit that you don't know the answer or
shut the f**k up?
why are you defensive
It's one thing to embarrass yourself with your
idiotic replies, but I draw the line where you start embarrassing ME
with your idiocy.

and I have done this how?

grow up

you have no control over a thread

your origainal post looks like the issues around K1MAN

you don't with any background and that would be required to give any
real answer

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Look, why don't you either just admit that you don't know the answer or
shut the f**k up? It's one thing to embarrass yourself with your
idiotic replies, but I draw the line where you start embarrassing ME
with your idiocy.

Why don't you pick up the phone and call the FCC and ask them?

wrote in message
oups.com...
Under 47 CFR Sec. 1.945, pertaining to license grants for
authorizations in the Private Radio Services, subparagraph (c) sets
forth the findings necessary for the Commission to grant the
application in question without a hearing, and subparagraph (f) states
that the Commission has to designate the application for a hearing if
it can't make the findings contained in subparagraph (c). Assume that
an amateur appllies for renewal of his license and the Private Radio
Bureau "offlines" it, which is tantamount to saying that the Commission
cannot make the findings contained in subparagraph (c), and takes no
action on it for an extended period of time. How long does the
Commission have to sit on the application before designating it for a
hearing under subparagraph (f)? And what provision of law imposes that
time limit?

Howard W3CQH wrote:
Why don't you pick up the phone and call the FCC and ask them?
because he trolling K1MAN

wrote in message
oups.com...
Under 47 CFR Sec. 1.945, pertaining to license grants for

Because I believe they will tell me that there is no such time limit.
So if one really exists, it seems to me I would need to discover it by
seeking independent advice. And no, I have no connection whatsoever to
K1MAN and I am certainly not "trolling" for him.

I have sought advice from a communications lawyer, and was informed
that there is no applicable time limit for the Commission to act on
applications. The attorney said this is often a problem where the
Commission simply doesn't want to act on the application; in such a
case, they will try to just sit on it forever. When the delay becomes
particularly egregious, the attorney files a petition for a writ of
mandamus against the Commission in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Columbia, which has exclusive jurisdiction over such
actions.

wrote:
I have sought advice from a communications lawyer, and was informed
that there is no applicable time limit for the Commission to act on
so why you bothering the rest of