Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 20th 06, 11:28 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARS License Numbers


Sal M. Onella wrote:
I am quite sure that they all got their tickets with CW
required. And the problem stations on 75 are quite the same. Which
also proves nothing either way.


it does prove that CW testing is at best poor proof of screening out
bad ops


There's no test for one important ham skill: typing.
I asked around and found this practice is far from rare; I'm not sure
"common" is the right word, though.

We also might want to test for basic language skills, including punctuation.

why?

why do do we want to restrict the numer of hams in that manner

While it's not always true, the disagreeable transmissions (and NG posts)
often make the speakers/writers sound pretty ignorant.


  #2   Report Post  
Old May 22nd 06, 12:16 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
Roger
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARS License Numbers

On Sat, 20 May 2006 15:15:39 -0700, "Sal M. Onella"
wrote:




I am quite sure that they all got their tickets with CW
required. And the problem stations on 75 are quite the same. Which
also proves nothing either way.


it does prove that CW testing is at best poor proof of screening out
bad ops


There's no test for one important ham skill: typing. I didn't appreciate
how important it is until I learned that one of my pro-Morse buddies does
all of his sending with a computer. (He can send with a key but doesn't
know where his is.) He says he copies with the computer, too, although he
can follow along with the audio.

I asked around and found this practice is far from rare; I'm not sure
"common" is the right word, though.

We also might want to test for basic language skills, including punctuation.
While it's not always true, the disagreeable transmissions (and NG posts)
often make the speakers/writers sound pretty ignorant.


In that case how about testing for personality traits as well as
anti-social and anti-authoritarian behavior? :-))

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com



  #3   Report Post  
Old May 22nd 06, 07:36 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARS License Numbers

I asked around and found this practice is far from rare; I'm not sure
"common" is the right word, though.


You really need to type if you run cw over about 60wpm
or so.. That was about my limit as far as sending fairly clean
with a paddle. I never liked to type, so 55-60 wpm pretty much was
the limit for me. Most all the high speed people used a keyboard
to send. But I'd say the majority listened with their ears instead
of using a reader. The brain is a better reader than most puter CW
programs. Most don't handle noise very well. Once I hit 55-60 wpm
on a paddle, I was stretching the limits. Past that, and it was pretty
dang ugly... Slopsville. The keyboards could kick back and type
about any CW speed with perfect sending. A decent typist can go
over 100 wpm+.
MK

  #4   Report Post  
Old May 20th 06, 06:32 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARS License Numbers

Slow Code wrote:
I predicted and warned you all this would happen, but none of you wouldn't
listen.


If none of us wouldn't listen, doesn't that mean that
all of us did listen?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
  #5   Report Post  
Old May 20th 06, 11:45 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
Scott
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARS License Numbers



Slow Code wrote:




I predicted and warned you all this would happen, but none of you wouldn't
listen.


None of us WOULDN'T listen? That means we all did, which is a lie...I
never heard your prediction before.



On the bright side, there's a lot more ham gear on eBay you can bid on.


But...what good does having a bunch of gear if there is nobody to talk
to or listen to? I guess it's good if you're starting a radio museum...


sc



  #6   Report Post  
Old May 20th 06, 03:24 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
Ron
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARS License Numbers

On the bright side, there's a lot more ham gear on eBay you can bid on.


But...what good does having a bunch of gear if there is nobody to talk
to or listen to? I guess it's good if you're starting a radio museum...



Actually there is less of the good stuff on eBay than there was 2 years
ago. Plus prices for the rare stuff still keeps going up.


  #7   Report Post  
Old May 21st 06, 02:57 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARS License Numbers

**Please note the date of these numbers - this is a delayed repost from
early April, 2006**

These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals
on the stated dates, and the percentage of
the total number of active licenses that
class contains:

As of May 14, 2000:

Novice - 49,329 (7.3%)
Technician - 205,394 (30.4%)
Technician Plus - 128,860 (19.1%)
General - 112,677 (16.7%)
Advanced - 99,782 (14.8%)
Extra - 78,750 (11.7%)

Total Tech/TechPlus - 334,254 (49.5%)

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 291,209 (43.2%)

Total all classes - 674,792


As of April 2, 2006:

Novice - 25,614 (3.9%) [decrease of 23,715]
Technician - 278,690 (42.3%) [increase of 73,296]
Technician Plus - 40,534 (6.1%) [decrease of 88,506]
General - 133,682 (20.3%) [increase of 21,005]
Advanced - 72,819 (11.0%) [decrease of 26,963]
Extra - 107,768 (16.4%) [increase of 29,018]

Total Tech/TechPlus - 319,224 (48.4%) [decrease of 14,964]

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 314,269 (47.7%) [increase of 22,351]

Total all classes - 659,107 (decrease of 15,685)

Note that these totals do not include licenses
that have expired but are in the grace period.

They also do not include club, military, RACES
or other station-only licenses.

Note also that effective April 15, 2000, new
Novice, Technician Plus and Advanced licenses
are no longer issued.

Since April 15, 2000, FCC has renewed all existing
Technician Plus licenses as Technician. It is therefore
informative to consider the totals of the two classes,
since the Technician class includes a significant
number of Technician Plus licenses renewed as
Technician.

73 de Jim, N2EY

  #8   Report Post  
Old May 21st 06, 03:36 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
Lic
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARS License Numbers


wrote in message
**Please note the date of these numbers

/////// DRIVEL FLUSHED ////////



Who Cares?




  #10   Report Post  
Old June 3rd 06, 07:55 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARS License Numbers

These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals
on the stated dates, and the percentage of
the total number of active licenses that
class contains:

As of May 14, 2000:

Novice - 49,329 (7.3%)
Technician - 205,394 (30.4%)
Technician Plus - 128,860 (19.1%)
General - 112,677 (16.7%)
Advanced - 99,782 (14.8%)
Extra - 78,750 (11.7%)

Total Tech/TechPlus - 334,254 (49.5%)

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 291,209 (43.2%)

Total all classes - 674,792


As of June 1, 2006:

Novice - 25,083 (3.8%) [decrease of 24,246]
Technician - 280,995 (42.7%) [increase of 75,601]
Technician Plus - 38,704 (5.9%) [decrease of 90,156]
General - 133,169 (20.2%) [increase of 20,492]
Advanced - 72,179 (11.0%) [decrease of 27,603]
Extra - 108,140 (16.4%) [increase of 29,390]

Total Tech/TechPlus - 319,699 (48.6%) [decrease of 14,585]

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 313,488 (47.6%) [increase of 22,279]

Total all classes - 658,270 (decrease of 16,522)

Note that these totals do not include licenses
that have expired but are in the grace period.

They also do not include club, military, RACES
or other station-only licenses.

Note also that effective April 15, 2000, new
Novice, Technician Plus and Advanced licenses
are no longer issued.

Since April 15, 2000, FCC has renewed all existing
Technician Plus licenses as Technician. It is therefore
informative to consider the totals of the two classes,
since the Technician class includes a significant
number of Technician Plus licenses renewed as
Technician.

73 de Jim, N2EY



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? Bill Sohl Policy 254 December 31st 05 03:50 AM
Why not more young'uns in Ham radio Mike Coslo Policy 224 June 27th 05 07:50 PM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 private General 0 May 10th 04 09:39 PM
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st Dwight Stewart Policy 300 August 12th 03 12:25 AM
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement Scott Unit 69 Policy 9 August 1st 03 02:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017