Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bzzzzzttt....wrong. The problem is the old farts fought changes for so
long that the population got interested in other things like computers and Internet. I mean who the heck wants to learn old, outdated code in an Internet world. It's not "dumbing down" it's antiquated and not needed. Sure it's fun if you want to learn it, but why force people to learn something that is just not necessary? It's not. The change away from code should have been made 20 years ago. Actually, you apparently don't even listen to 11 meters because if you did, you would hear a very quiet band. They've left for the Internet and cell phones. I don't know where you come up with this stuff you have been spewing out lately, but you are grossly out of touch with reality. There's nothing wrong with appliance operators. Let people communicate and communicate easily. This is the age of easy to use radios. Radios with silicon and not old, big, hot glass tubes. The world always changes and you have to learn to change with it. So give up your buggy whip, get down from your horse, and learn to drive a car. We're not going to test you on animal husbandry as it applies to horses in order for you to get a license to drive a modern car. It's not dumbing down, it's just evolution. Slow Code wrote: They cheapened the license, now nobody decent wants to get one and the FCC is still thinking of dumbing it down even more. Pretty soon it will be just CB'ers, lids, and retards that get licensed because testing will get dumbed down to the point even they can get an extra, then the rest of us will have to listen to bands that sound like 11 meters. |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() J. D. B. wrote: "Bzzzzzttt....wrong. The problem is the old farts fought changes for so long that the population got interested in other things like computers and Internet. I mean who the heck wants to learn old, outdated code in an Internet world. It's not "dumbing down" it's antiquated and not needed. Sure it's fun if you want to learn it, but why force people to learn something that is just not necessary? It's not. The change away from code should have been made 20 years ago." indeed well said " Actually, you apparently don't even listen to 11 meters because if you did, you would hear a very quiet band. They've left for the Internet and cell phones." indeed they have and that is the fate he truly seem to WANT for the ARS silence and it demise if he can't have it HIS way I don't know where you come up with this stuff you have been spewing out lately, but you are grossly out of touch with reality. There's nothing wrong with appliance operators. Let people communicate and communicate easily. This is the age of easy to use radios. Radios with silicon and not old, big, hot glass tubes. The world always changes and you have to learn to change with it. So give up your buggy whip, get down from your horse, and learn to drive a car. We're not going to test you on animal husbandry as it applies to horses in order for you to get a license to drive a modern car. It's not dumbing down, it's just evolution. Slow Code wrote: They cheapened the license, now nobody decent wants to get one and the FCC is still thinking of dumbing it down even more. Pretty soon it will be just CB'ers, lids, and retards that get licensed because testing will get dumbed down to the point even they can get an extra, then the rest of us will have to listen to bands that sound like 11 meters. |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"J. D. B." wrote in
: Bzzzzzttt....wrong. The problem is the old farts fought changes for so long that the population got interested in other things like computers and Internet. I mean who the heck wants to learn old, outdated code in an Internet world. It's not "dumbing down" it's antiquated and not needed. Sure it's fun if you want to learn it, but why force people to learn something that is just not necessary? It's not. The change away from code should have been made 20 years ago. Actually, you apparently don't even listen to 11 meters because if you did, you would hear a very quiet band. They've left for the Internet and cell phones. I don't know where you come up with this stuff you have been spewing out lately, but you are grossly out of touch with reality. There's nothing wrong with appliance operators. Let people communicate and communicate easily. This is the age of easy to use radios. Radios with silicon and not old, big, hot glass tubes. The world always changes and you have to learn to change with it. So give up your buggy whip, get down from your horse, and learn to drive a car. We're not going to test you on animal husbandry as it applies to horses in order for you to get a license to drive a modern car. It's not dumbing down, it's just evolution. I know you're right. Hams just want to be appliance operators these days and they don't want license exams that will interfere with them getting to those appliances even though it means being less worthy. I don't see anyone modernizing like everyone says is happening. They just get their licenses and grab a microphone. What percentage of hams have a computer connected to a radio? Probably less than 30%. Hams don't want to modernize. Guess we just have live with inferior operators on the bands from here on out. Then again, maybe hams shouldn't be required to be knowledgable or have skills. Requiring skills and knowledge is too old skool. Everything must be outcome based these days, even licensing. It ain't like we have to help out in emergencies or anything. It's Quantity, not quality. 73'sssssssssssssssssssss |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: "J. D. B." wrote in : So give up your buggy whip, get down from your horse, and learn to drive a car. We're not going to test you on animal husbandry as it applies to horses in order for you to get a license to drive a modern car. It's not dumbing down, it's just evolution. I know you're right. and yet you refuse to deal with that reality Hams just want to be appliance operators these days and they don't want license exams that will interfere with them getting to those appliances even though it means being less worthy. I don't see anyone modernizing like everyone says is happening. They just get their licenses and grab a microphone. What percentage of hams have a computer connected to a radio? Probably less than 30%. well three of my radios are and my moble rigs can be interfaced to a laptop if I feel the need and yet I am one of the folsk YOU to have the FCC throw the bands Hams don't want to modernize. one fo the few thing you get right you don't want to modernize either BTW Guess we just have live with inferior operators on the bands from here on out. Then again, maybe hams shouldn't be required to be knowledgable or have skills. you keep drinking the product of the sour grapes and you will never notice if any body is on the bands Requiring skills and knowledge is too old skool. Everything must be outcome based these days, even licensing. It ain't like we have to help out in emergencies or anything. It's Quantity, not quality. 73'sssssssssssssssssssss grow up if you can cowardly troll |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: "J. D. B." wrote in : So give up your buggy whip, get down from your horse, and learn to drive a car. We're not going to test you on animal husbandry as it applies to horses in order for you to get a license to drive a modern car. It's not dumbing down, it's just evolution. I know you're right. and yet you refuse to deal with that reality Hams just want to be appliance operators these days and they don't want license exams that will interfere with them getting to those appliances even though it means being less worthy. I don't see anyone modernizing like everyone says is happening. They just get their licenses and grab a microphone. What percentage of hams have a computer connected to a radio? Probably less than 30%. well three of my radios are and my moble rigs can be interfaced to a laptop if I feel the need and yet I am one of the folsk YOU to have the FCC throw the bands Hams don't want to modernize. one fo the few thing you get right you don't want to modernize either BTW Guess we just have live with inferior operators on the bands from here on out. Then again, maybe hams shouldn't be required to be knowledgable or have skills. you keep drinking the product of the sour grapes and you will never notice if any body is on the bands Requiring skills and knowledge is too old skool. Everything must be outcome based these days, even licensing. It ain't like we have to help out in emergencies or anything. It's Quantity, not quality. 73'sssssssssssssssssssss grow up if you can cowardly troll |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote: get help sicko |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals on the stated dates, and the percentage of the total number of active licenses that class contains: As of May 14, 2000: Novice - 49,329 (7.3%) Technician - 205,394 (30.4%) Technician Plus - 128,860 (19.1%) General - 112,677 (16.7%) Advanced - 99,782 (14.8%) Extra - 78,750 (11.7%) Total Tech/TechPlus - 334,254 (49.5%) Total General/Advanced/Extra - 291,209 (43.2%) Total all classes - 674,792 As of July 15, 2006: Novice - 24,835 (3.8%) [decrease of 24,494] Technician - 282,967 (43.0%) [increase of 77,573] Technician Plus - 37,496 (5.7%) [decrease of 91,364] General - 132,770 (20.2%) [increase of 20,093] Advanced - 71,671 (10.9%) [decrease of 28,111] Extra - 108,214 (16.4%) [increase of 29,464] Total Tech/TechPlus - 320,463 (48.7%) [decrease of 13,791] Total General/Advanced/Extra - 312,655 (47.5%) [increase of 21,446] Total all classes - 657,953 (decrease of 16,839) Note that these totals do not include licenses that have expired but are in the grace period. They also do not include club, military, RACES or other station-only licenses. Note also that effective April 15, 2000, new Novice, Technician Plus and Advanced licenses are no longer issued. Since April 15, 2000, FCC has renewed all existing Technician Plus licenses as Technician. It is therefore informative to consider the totals of the two classes, since the Technician class includes a significant number of Technician Plus licenses renewed as Technician. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Why not more young'uns in Ham radio | Policy | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy |