Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friend wrote: get help sicko Poor Markie............ |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: These are the numbers of current, unexpired Total all classes - 658,032 (decrease of 16,760) That's what happens when you dumb things down. Having a license doesn't mean anything and they leave. Technology certainly didn't keep them in the service. Dumbing things down more will just let retards on HF. well your "plan" would simply kill off the ARS SC |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, it's what happens when give people tests that are irrelevant to the
state of the service and the world today. It's what happens when old timers keep the impression alive that ham radio is about code, tubes and other worthless old "technologies". It's what happens when we try to gate people out by making them pass the same worthless crap we had to pass because, "well I had to do it so they should have to do it" mentality. We already have a bunch of "retards" on HF and have for the thirty plus years that I can remember. Testing didn't keep the low-lifes out then, and it is not going to do it now. Learn to face reality. The old tests are what has brought on the problems - especially the worthless code tests. It's not about "dumbing down" the testing. It's about the need to modernize the testing, and our hanging onto the old and outdated for far too long, that has caused the problems we face today. Blow Code wrote: That's what happens when you dumb things down. Having a license doesn't mean anything and they leave. Technology certainly didn't keep them in the service. Dumbing things down more will just let retards on HF. BC |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"J. D. B." wrote in
: No, it's what happens when give people tests that are irrelevant to the state of the service and the world today. It's what happens when old timers keep the impression alive that ham radio is about code, tubes and other worthless old "technologies". It's what happens when we try to gate people out by making them pass the same worthless crap we had to pass because, "well I had to do it so they should have to do it" mentality. We already have a bunch of "retards" on HF and have for the thirty plus years that I can remember. Testing didn't keep the low-lifes out then, and it is not going to do it now. Learn to face reality. The old tests are what has brought on the problems - especially the worthless code tests. It's not about "dumbing down" the testing. It's about the need to modernize the testing, and our hanging onto the old and outdated for far too long, that has caused the problems we face today. Having to learn CW isn't preventing you from modernizing, You're just lazy. Now go play with your model cho-cho trains. SC |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: "J. D. B." wrote in : No, it's what happens when give people tests that are irrelevant to the state of the service and the world today. It's what happens when old timers keep the impression alive that ham radio is about code, tubes and other worthless old "technologies". It's what happens when we try to gate people out by making them pass the same worthless crap we had to pass because, "well I had to do it so they should have to do it" mentality. We already have a bunch of "retards" on HF and have for the thirty plus years that I can remember. Testing didn't keep the low-lifes out then, and it is not going to do it now. Learn to face reality. The old tests are what has brought on the problems - especially the worthless code tests. It's not about "dumbing down" the testing. It's about the need to modernize the testing, and our hanging onto the old and outdated for far too long, that has caused the problems we face today. Having to learn CW isn't preventing you from modernizing, You're just lazy. Now go play with your model cho-cho trains. more libel you sound just liek wismen and robeson SC |
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals on the stated dates, and the percentage of the total number of active licenses that class contains: As of May 14, 2000: Novice - 49,329 (7.3%) Technician - 205,394 (30.4%) Technician Plus - 128,860 (19.1%) General - 112,677 (16.7%) Advanced - 99,782 (14.8%) Extra - 78,750 (11.7%) Total Tech/TechPlus - 334,254 (49.5%) Total General/Advanced/Extra - 291,209 (43.2%) Total all classes - 674,792 As of August 2, 2006: Novice - 24,715 (3.8%) [decrease of 24,614] Technician - 283,467 (43.1%) [increase of 78,073] Technician Plus - 37,012 (5.6%) [decrease of 91,848] General - 132,510 (20.2%) [increase of 19,833] Advanced - 71,381 (10.9%) [decrease of 28,401] Extra - 108,206 (16.5%) [increase of 29,456] (percentages may not add up to exactly 100.0% due to rounding) Total Tech/TechPlus - 320,479 (48.8%) [decrease of 13,775] Total General/Advanced/Extra - 312,097 (47.4%) [increase of 20,888] Total all classes - 657,291 (decrease of 17,501) Note that these totals do not include licenses that have expired but are in the grace period. They also do not include club, military, RACES or other station-only licenses. Note also that effective April 15, 2000, new Novice, Technician Plus and Advanced licenses are no longer issued. Since April 15, 2000, FCC has renewed all existing Technician Plus licenses as Technician. It is therefore informative to consider the totals of the two classes, since the Technician class includes a significant number of Technician Plus licenses renewed as Technician. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#69
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Why not more young'uns in Ham radio | Policy | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy |