Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
notbob wrote:
On 2006-06-21, Dave wrote: I served for 6 years as Program Chief Engineer on the USAF MX Missile (WS-118) RS/RV]. You bragging or complaining? nb Debunking a 'LABEL' |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr. Noonian Soong wrote:
darpa dave wrote: I served for 6 years as Program Chief Engineer on the USAF MX Missile (WS-118) RS/RV]. MX missiles destroyed my country, you insensitive clod! Soong MX missiles have never been launched operationally. They were decommissioned by treaty after the fall of the Soviet Union. If they had been used WE wouldn't be here! You are mistaken. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr. Noonian Soong wrote:
darpa dave wrote: I served for 6 years as Program Chief Engineer on the USAF MX Missile (WS-118) RS/RV]. MX missiles destroyed my country, you insensitive clod! Soong In as much as the MX missile carries a hydrogen warhead I don't think that Soong's country was destroyed by one. |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David G. Nagel" wrote in message ... In as much as the MX missile carries a hydrogen warhead I don't think that Soong's country was destroyed by one. Dr. Nagel, You please listen to me, I get PhD from big university. My university so expensive most American can't buy cafeteria lunch. Long time ago, many years, I make secret lair in Bikini Atoll. American call it that, but I rename to Soong's Micronesian Micronation. It has nice ring to it. Anyway, I build androids and mind my own business, but one day I monitor Americans and they say they blow up my island. Some missile test, but I say waste of perfectly good rocks. I detect submarine with my acoustics, and I transmit on ELF and say "Don't blow up my island please!" But my Engrish so bad, they get confused and jam me with much megawatts. I not give up though. I build big ideograph out of bamboo, it say "Don't blow up my island thanks". But they have no analyst that read my language. I escape in nick of time in my junk ship. look at picture, see big hole in middle of island? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bikini_Atoll MX missile destroy me. Now I teach dumb punk how to repair personal computer. I get revenge. I build big contest station and beat everyone. Soong |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOPE! The MX missile has 100% nothing to do with the Bikini Tests! Those tests
were conducted after WWII and ended in the 1950s. The MX missile initial deployment was 1985. By today's standards, the Bikini tests were low yield [~20KT] fission devices. Today's standard is moderate yields [~300 to 500 KT] fission-fusion devices. MX has nothing to do with Bikini Atoll. Have fun building your androids. Dr. Noonian Soong wrote: "David G. Nagel" wrote in message ... In as much as the MX missile carries a hydrogen warhead I don't think that Soong's country was destroyed by one. Dr. Nagel, You please listen to me, I get PhD from big university. My university so expensive most American can't buy cafeteria lunch. Long time ago, many years, I make secret lair in Bikini Atoll. American call it that, but I rename to Soong's Micronesian Micronation. It has nice ring to it. Anyway, I build androids and mind my own business, but one day I monitor Americans and they say they blow up my island. Some missile test, but I say waste of perfectly good rocks. I detect submarine with my acoustics, and I transmit on ELF and say "Don't blow up my island please!" But my Engrish so bad, they get confused and jam me with much megawatts. I not give up though. I build big ideograph out of bamboo, it say "Don't blow up my island thanks". But they have no analyst that read my language. I escape in nick of time in my junk ship. look at picture, see big hole in middle of island? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bikini_Atoll MX missile destroy me. Now I teach dumb punk how to repair personal computer. I get revenge. I build big contest station and beat everyone. Soong |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DrDeath" wrote in message ... [snip] Why do you find the need to boost your (lack of) self-confidence by insulting this person by comparing him to Mark? Mark chooses to sit on his ass sucking the entitlement system dry and contributing nothing to society, while this person decided to make the best of his what God gave him and he contributes to the same entitlement system that Mark chooses to deplete. Earl you are not the Pearl of wisdom, you are the faux Pearl that trolls to enhance your (lack of) self-esteem. Something I just thought of at the spur of the moment (not to mention keeps me on topic), some disabled person should sue to remove ALL code requirements, or offer an exclusion to those with disabilities to not have to take ANY code test under the Americans with Disability Act. I'm sure that person could even get a free ACLU lawyer to handle it. The FCC has already addressed the issue by allowing and requiring the VEs to accommodate the handicapped. They may use lights, pressure pulses, or (for severely handicapped person) send individual letters and ask the person the letters as they send them, etc. They can use a sending test in place of a receiving test. Sending is generally quite a bit easier than copying. The main thing on any accommodation is to contact the VEs in advance. I suspect if the ACLU were to try to take it to court, those handicapped individuals who have passed the code would line up in droves to testify against the ACLU. Those who are handicapped often don't want to be pampered, especially in those areas where they are successful. Dee Flint, N8UZE |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dee Flint wrote:
"DrDeath" wrote in message ... "Slow Code" wrote in message Well I described a number of alternatives to learning and he persists in saying he cannot learn code. Now I have not insulted him that I know of (although it's difficult to predict what one might take as an insult). you don't understand why callign someone liar is an insult then you are truly dumber than Wismen |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: "DrDeath" wrote in message ... I suspect if the ACLU were to try to take it to court, those handicapped individuals who have passed the code would line up in droves to testify against the ACLU. Those who are handicapped often don't want to be pampered, especially in those areas where they are successful. possible but you are unlikely to find many handicapped folks that have assed morse who are handicapped in similar manner to myself lining to to say how doable it is but then gagin again you are dumbe enough think you can call some one liar with out offending them Dee Flint, N8UZE |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DrDeath wrote: "Dave" wrote in message . .. DrDeath wrote: SNIPPED Something I just thought of at the spur of the moment (not to mention keeps me on topic), some disabled person should sue to remove ALL code requirements, or offer an exclusion to those with disabilities to not have to take ANY code test under the Americans with Disability Act. I'm sure that person could even get a free ACLU lawyer to handle it. Many years ago, 1950s, there was a very active 10 meter ham in Danvers, Massachusetts, during the period of Class A, B and C licenses. He was an arthritic quadriplegic. He was wheel chair bound, lived alone, and required visiting help to get into and out of bed and have his meals prepared and served. He had a Class C [Conditional] license. He learned to copy 'read' CW in his head although he did not have the ability to send. I don't think he would consider a lawsuit appropriate. so what? with all due respsct to this man his problem were not mine (nor mine his) Some of the OTs on this list may have worked him. W1JFS, Les MacCrakin. God Rest His Soul. /s/ DD, W1MCE He may not, but others that may be dyslexic, deaf, or other handicapped person may deem a lawsuit appropriate. May word begin to look for the accololypse I agree with every word in a post from Dr Death aloouth the use of this story doess illustrate what is called in some circle "cripple casts" where the more visible handicaps claim if they greater entitlement to accomodation and as I have said it has been disucussed aclu is not interested and a few people I know are looking for an antonry to take it on, however few are willing as long as the FCC contiues to dangle the likehood they would act in less than the 5 or years prusuing that would take |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DrDeath wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message . net... Dee Flint wrote: Well I described a number of alternatives to learning and he persists in saying he cannot learn code. ... The fact that he can speak and understand the spoken word means he can learn code at the basic level of 5wpm. A completely deaf person can speak and read lips but he/she still cannot even hear Morse code. What you need to understand is that something that seems normal to you is missing in some people. If an amateur radio license required dunking a basket- ball, could you do it? As one who can dunk a basketball, I can tell you all you need is enough will and effort and you can do it. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp With deaf people use can use a light or a subwoofer for them to copy code. I don't want to stereotype deaf people, but I have found many of them to be hooked on entitlements and expect unreasonable accommodations. all the accomodation I want is my own hearing aid in this is my trusty code reader OTOH since that does absicaly oviate the the test I beleive fairness demands I support ending the tst all together as serving no legitimate RUGULATORY prupose I have a relative that refuses to wear a hearing aid, and then gets angry when there are communication problems. This person is physically able to work; yet sits around on my tax dollars playing the feel sorry for me card. well I earn aliving pay my taxes I just want legal right to fair access to the spectrum that is comon to all of us as american (in the USA abraud YMMV) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we cancommunicatewith other. | Antenna | |||
Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we cancommunicatewith other. | General | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment |