Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul W. Schleck wrote in
: In Lloyd writes: On 6 Jul 2006 21:47:06 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Jim Riley wrote: RESULT remove rec.radio.amateur.policy The Big-8 Management Board has decided by consensus to remove the newsgroup rec.radio.amateur.policy. Voting began on 01 Jul 2006, and ended on 02 Jul 2006. This group will be removed on 17 Jul 2006. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION: There were no comments made. RATIONALE: Remove rec.radio.amateur.policy The last official message was in May 2006. Not true, I posted a message on our echolink system on June of this year. Read that again. You aren't a Usenet admin, and an "official message" is one which has been posted to a news group by an admin. That message would probably be the one posted by Paul Schleck at about that time. There are other more suitable means of discussing radio policy, so rec.radio.amateur.policy is not a suitable candidate for conversion to a moderated newsgroup. The PROBLEM with this group is it has people who flame the group and don't belong here. remove those people and you fix the problem. Wiseman and Morgan both have ham licenses and are responsible for at least 90% of the spam in here. Morgan even has seven or eight nyms he uses so that he can exceed (and abuse) Google's posting limits. Schleck wanted to make this a moderated group. The admins said "no" and now are going to remove it completely, if you believe this message. I say leave it alone. Let Morgan and Wiseman remain here while the rest of us move elsewhere when we want serious discussion. Robeson has wisely gone to a web board, as have most other serious posters. I won't name the board, because I don't want to give Morgan or his play pals any additional information. Someone is playing pranks with forged messages. There is no official plan to delete rec.radio.amateur.policy, nor will there be. There was a previous forged message in the same vein with a bogus Request for Discussion (RFD) for a rec.radio.amateur.policy.moderated newsgroup. This was a counterfeit RFD, modified from an actual RFD for soc.men.moderated. This latest counterfeit post was based on a deletion announcement for one of the obsolete comp.sources.* newsgroups, many of which haven't been used in over a decade. I wonder if it was the same individual who was sending forged messages, in my name, through the aioe.org news server. The administrators at aioe.org assure me that such forgeries are now blocked. Thanks go to them for their interest in promptly and decisively dealing with that unfortunate incident. If another Usenet post appears to be from me, you can authenticate it by the Path and other headers indicating it is from Novia/Newscene, and not another source. I also do not use obscene language in my posts, including phonetics for my callsign. The only effort towards a moderated rec.radio.amateur.* newsgroup that I am aware of is still in the planning stages, and will be for a new moderated discussion newsgroup that will leave the existing newsgroups alone. No one in authority has said "no" to us. In fact, we have a Usenet Group Mentor assigned and are working towards a proposal. I posted a message to the rec.radio.amateur.policy newsgroup previously, calling for volunteer moderators. Response has been sufficient that we now have a suitable moderation team and can move forward. Watch this newsgroup, and news.groups, for further information later this summer/early fall. In accordance with Usenet group creation procedures, there will be multiple announcements, and ample opportunity for interested parties to debate and vote on any proposal for a new newsgroup. -- 73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU Does this mean we can kick Mark out of the group? SC |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: Paul W. Schleck wrote in : Does this mean we can kick Mark out of the group? for what? SC |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
true,so true........
only the most top notch mother****ers post on qrz...LOL! "Lloyd" wrote in message ... rrap is a good place to keep Wiseman et al. If they are busy here, they won't disrupt serious discussion elsewhere. There are no sociopaths on QRZ.com or QTH.com. Both Fred, AA7BQ and Scott, KA9FOX do a *great* job, by quickly and permanently throwing nut cases off their boards. We owe both these gentlemen much, for giving us a place to go for serious undisturbed discussions. Lloyd |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friend wrote: true,so true........ only the most top notch mother****ers post on qrz...LOL! well you are aquiring better maners in your forging aeio.org idoit I post on QRZ myself and I am certain top notch |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
please stop forging me. you can't get an account because you forge
"an old freind" wrote in message oups.com... an old friend wrote: true,so true........ only the most top notch mother****ers post on qrz...LOL! well you are aquiring better maners in your forging aeio.org idoit I post on QRZ myself and I am certain top notch |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friend wrote: please stop forging me. how can I be forging in using MY email address and MY call |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friend wrote: please stop forging me more of the aeio.org foger |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
but yuo cabnot get a account herre becauye you forge me.gte hlp desk but yuo
wont gte hlp "an old freind" wrote in message oups.com... an old friend wrote: please stop forging me more of the aeio.org foger |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NAMES IN THE NEWS: K1MAN REFERENCES REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA | General | |||
NAMES IN THE NEWS: K1MAN REFERENCES REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA | Policy | |||
Loosening coil slugs -- the final result! :) | Boatanchors | |||
Loosening coil slugs -- the final result! :) | CB |