Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Byrns wrote:
The problem with this explanation is that the two secondaries appear to be connected so that they "buck" one another. If that is the actual case then the reactance of the two series connected secondary windings wouldn't change much with transformer saturation. Yes, I agree - I think its more of the coupling increasing and decreasing causing more or less bucking between the windings. The decrease in inductance (at 60 cycle) would not be near as influential as the loss of coupling... Then again - as you noted - physical layout could have very significant impact on both / either... hmmmm... It is an interesting application. Didn't GE have something like this in some of their consoles? I've never had one in for service - but it seems I recall reading something about them. best regards... -- randy guttery A Tender Tale - a page dedicated to those Ships and Crews so vital to the United States Silent Service: http://tendertale.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dimmer Switches | Shortwave | |||
FS: 1930 Stewart Warner SW Converter | Swap | |||
Antenna Reactance Question | Antenna | |||
FA: Stewart-Warner R-1362-A Majestic Dial Tabletop Radio | Swap | |||
WTB or Trade: Stewart-Warner R-1362-A Cabinet or Chasis | Swap |