Here are shots of the "Reesonator" mentioned on r.a.r.+p.
First try, the images were monstrous... hopefully this will be better.
Nelson

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:43:28 -0500, "Nelson Gietz"
wrote:

Here are shots of the "Reesonator" mentioned on r.a.r.+p.
First try, the images were monstrous... hopefully this will be better.
Nelson


Interesting to also look at
http://www.antiqueradios.com/forums/...ce3a ccf95464

Peter

Peter Dettmann wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:43:28 -0500, "Nelson Gietz"
wrote:

Here are shots of the "Reesonator" mentioned on r.a.r.+p.
First try, the images were monstrous... hopefully this will be better.
Nelson


Interesting to also look at
http://www.antiqueradios.com/forums/...ce3a ccf95464

Peter

Such a nice touch.
"exray
Banned"

And that is part of the problem with forums in general.

It's next to impossible to get "banned" on usenet, although it
does happen to the more gregarious types.

Jeff

Jeffrey D Angus wrote:


Such a nice touch.
"exray
Banned"

And that is part of the problem with forums in general.




-exray
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

"Jeffrey D Angus" wrote in message
...
Peter Dettmann wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:43:28 -0500, "Nelson Gietz"
wrote:

Here are shots of the "Reesonator" mentioned on r.a.r.+p.
First try, the images were monstrous... hopefully this will be better.
Nelson


Interesting to also look at

http://www.antiqueradios.com/forums/...ce3a ccf95464

Peter

Such a nice touch.
"exray
Banned"

And that is part of the problem with forums in general.

It's next to impossible to get "banned" on usenet, although it
does happen to the more gregarious types.

Jeff

Peter, Jeff,
Yes, I noticed with interest both the posts and the "banned" label.
They could have left the latter out of it I think...
Nelson