Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 1st 06, 01:53 AM posted to rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 1
Default BC780 puts 996/2096 to shame...

Radios aren't jealous like women . . . it's perfectly OK to have more than one.

Hell, I still use my Pro-2006 for mil air because it is even better than the 780 I used to have, as far as sensitivity is concerned.

I can't speak for the relatively new 996, but the Pro-2096 is a fine scanner. With all the crap they have to cram into one unit these days, I don't think it's reasonable to expect a perfect all-in-one analogue and digital solution . . . at an affordable price at least.

....and that bums me out cuz my local PD has gone digital and to upgrade I
have to buy a radio that has inferior performance.

I hope whatever comes out next from GRE/Uniden will be comparable to the
780 with digital reception.



--------------= Posted using GrabIt =----------------
------= Binary Usenet downloading made easy =---------
-= Get GrabIt for free from http://www.shemes.com/ =-

  #2   Report Post  
Old August 1st 06, 07:26 PM posted to rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 72
Default BC780 puts 996/2096 to shame...

Well my old trusty BC9000XLT is still by far my favorite scanner,
conventional, analog and all.
Has better rx and audio than the 780, however the 780 is one of the best
trunk trackers I've ever owned, and that's why I still have it. Although
after the rebanding it will be a conventional scanner again.
I have a Pro96, and other APCO25, I don't like it at all. For the money its
missing a lot of options that my old BC9000 already has, and its 10yrs old.
"Stratinator" wrote in message
...
Radios aren't jealous like women . . . it's perfectly OK to have more than
one.

Hell, I still use my Pro-2006 for mil air because it is even better than
the 780 I used to have, as far as sensitivity is concerned.

I can't speak for the relatively new 996, but the Pro-2096 is a fine
scanner. With all the crap they have to cram into one unit these days, I
don't think it's reasonable to expect a perfect all-in-one analogue and
digital solution . . . at an affordable price at least.

....and that bums me out cuz my local PD has gone digital and to upgrade I
have to buy a radio that has inferior performance.

I hope whatever comes out next from GRE/Uniden will be comparable to the
780 with digital reception.



--------------= Posted using GrabIt =----------------
------= Binary Usenet downloading made easy =---------
-= Get GrabIt for free from http://www.shemes.com/ =-



  #3   Report Post  
Old August 8th 06, 12:24 AM posted to rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 1
Default BC780 puts 996/2096 to shame...


"Stratinator" wrote in message
...
Radios aren't jealous like women . . . it's perfectly OK to have more than
one.

Hell, I still use my Pro-2006 for mil air because it is even better than
the 780 I used to have, as far as sensitivity is concerned.

I can't speak for the relatively new 996, but the Pro-2096 is a fine
scanner. With all the crap they have to cram into one unit these days, I
don't think it's reasonable to expect a perfect all-in-one analogue and
digital solution . . . at an affordable price at least.

....and that bums me out cuz my local PD has gone digital and to upgrade I
have to buy a radio that has inferior performance.

I hope whatever comes out next from GRE/Uniden will be comparable to the
780 with digital reception.



--------------= Posted using GrabIt =----------------
------= Binary Usenet downloading made easy =---------
-= Get GrabIt for free from http://www.shemes.com/ =-


If you look inside a Uniden 996, there is very little inside!

Tom


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BC780 puts 996/2096 to shame... WheatBoy Scanner 0 July 31st 06 11:38 PM
Shame on me yojimbo Shortwave 3 October 8th 04 09:47 AM
shame on you carolinians for voting for that rip off lawyer gw CB 15 February 6th 04 10:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017