Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#121
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee Flint" wrote in message . .. "Cecil Moore" wrote in message . .. wrote: From: "Dee Flint" on Sun, Oct 22 2006 8:47am Yes ham radio is supposed to be camaraderie. People are supposed to help each other. Then why don't they? Because a lot of pro-coders would rather belittle no-coders than help them? More likely a knee jerk reaction to the very few but very vocal ones who try to come in and act like they know all there is to know about radio when the "ink isn't even dry on their license". It's unfortunate that the experienced hams don't have the discipline to withstand this nonsense without such knee-jerk reactions. When a new licensee (the level of license is irrelevant) tells me that you can't work DX without an amplifier, I just tell him about the countries I worked with my 100 watt radio and relatively low mount G5RV. But some hams turn bitter instead when a newbie insists that he is right and they are wrong. Dee, N8UZE Such as Mark does? |
#122
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:25:41 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote: "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "Cecil Moore" wrote in message Such as Mark does? I never said anything such Although It is in fact imposible to work some of the DX I want to work with a 100 watt and G5RV That is correct. That is because you are a tech and cannot work HF at all! Like Dee, I've worked stations worldwide with "just" 100 watts and a G5RV and you could too, if you'd but learn a paltry 5wpm code speed. |
#123
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() It's not code requirements or tests that is keeping ( and driving) good people out of ham radio, and away from lists like these, it's psychopaths like SC and the idiots that feed him. This WAS about real issues, and about technology (I hit this cesspool from the antennas list), but it is not now. Thanks to the crap fron SC, and from the idiots that feed this Troll, I'm leaving. On real lists, s--t pots like him are kicked out. On usenets, the only way is to quit feeding his ego, but, unfortunately, he is not the only idiot here. Bye-Bill |
#124
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill" wrote in
oups.com: It's not code requirements or tests that is keeping ( and driving) good people out of ham radio, and away from lists like these, it's psychopaths like SC and the idiots that feed him. This WAS about real issues, and about technology (I hit this cesspool from the antennas list), but it is not now. Thanks to the crap fron SC, and from the idiots that feed this Troll, I'm leaving. On real lists, s--t pots like him are kicked out. On usenets, the only way is to quit feeding his ego, but, unfortunately, he is not the only idiot here. Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? SC |
#125
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote in
oups.com: Barry OGrady wrote: On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:54:46 -0500, Nada Tapu wrote: On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 23:23:03 GMT, Slow Code wrote: Or just lazy people out? Sc It certainly didn't keep me out, and I wasn't all that crazy about learning it, either. More to the point, are there more licensed amateurs since the code requirement was removed years ago? Yes. In the USA at least. Since the inception of the no-code Technician class here in 1991, the growth of the Technician class license numbers in the USA has been continuous. Those now comprise about 49 % of ALL licensees. The Technician class license numbers are twice that of General class, the next-largest license class. Since the "reconstruction" in FCC amateur radio regulations of 2001, the number of licensees grew to peak in July, 2003. At that time the maximum code test rate was fixed at 5 WPM, all classes. A problem now is the attrition of the older licensees. More old- timers are leaving/expiring (their licenses) than are being replaced by new (never before licensed in amateur radio) licensees. Source: www.hamdata.com. That trend has persisted for three years. The code test is not THE factor causing it, just one of the major factors in slowing the increase of new licensees. Coupled with the stubborn resistance to change of ANY regulations by olde-tymers, there is little incentive to enter olde-tyme amateur radio. Ally that with the huge growth of the Internet in the 15 years it has been public - an Internet that has spread worldwide with near-instant communications over that world - and the traditional standards and practices of olde-tyme ham radio just don't have the appeal to newcomers they once had. Elimination of the code test for any license will cause a spurt in new licensees. While such elimination is not a guarantee to far-future growth, it will be the significant act to being CHANGING regulations to better fit the modern times. Keeping up with changing times is a NECESSITY in regulations, regardless of the personal desires of the minority of amateurs making up the olde-tyme group. You should market your posts to farmers Len. The fertilizer content in them could green the Sahara. SC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
shortwv | Shortwave | |||
178 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave |