Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:54:46 -0400, Al Klein
spake thusly: On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:54:33 GMT, Opus- wrote: On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:57:18 -0400, Al Klein spake thusly: On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:18:30 -0400, Dave wrote: Nice strawman. The pixels form a full complete picture. Beeps are just beeps. And speech is just noise if you don't understand it. Speech has infection. Not if you keep your saliva to yourself. My bad. Was supposed to be "inflection". Aren't spell checkers supposed to read your mind?? ;-) You can say the same sentence 10 different ways and it can have 10 different meanings depending on the emotion invoked in the speech. You know....the HUMAN element. ANY communication you don't understand, including CW, is like that. You can't tell us what candy tastes like if you're standing on the street looking through the window of the store. One dimensional. That they form a recognizable pattern does not make them more. Humans are highly visual creatures. Which is why it was said, for many centuries, I suppose, that it's speech that separates us from the animals. (We're a lot less visually oriented than a lot of other species.) See above. You're simply wrong. Humans are aural creatures. Argue with me when you get enough education in the subject that you're qualified to discuss it. Are YOU qualified? We gather more information about our environment from vision than any other sense. Now, that's NOT to say that we have the best vision in the animal kingdom. Our vision is refined and depended on at the expense of our other senses. Ever have a pet cat or dog that was blind and deaf? I have and you would be surprised how well then can adapt with just the sense of smell and touch alone. Humans need some degree of assistance. I have listened to code for years. Being able to make out a few letters does nothing for me. I have listened to Turkish for years. Being able to make out a few words does nothing for me. But there are a lot of Turks who feel otherwise. Bet you can easily tell what kind of a mood the speaker is in just by his tone. I can tell that on the air too - in CW. I can't tell it here, so I guess you'll be leaving Usenet. Why would I want to leave usenet? You're not making any sense. Want to use CW? Go right ahead, you have that right. Nobody has ever said that you shouldn't be able to. I don't speak Ukrainian but I sure knew when my grandmother was mad at me. Not by her words, though, which is what you're claiming. So tell me, what mood am I in at the moment? Evidently, since Usenet is a visual medium, you can tell. I never said I could tell by her words. Usent is text, by the way, not visual. Or you just don't know what you're talking about. Your insularity is showing. Not insularity...humanity. Which has nothing to do with communication, which every life form participates in - even those who have no analog of vision. Not quite sure what point you are making here. -- (Jim, single dad to Lesleigh [Autistic] 04/20/94) "What, Me Worry?" A. E. Newman Please note: All unsolicited e-mail sent to me may, at my discretion, be posted in this newsgroup verbatim. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
FS MFJ 462B Code Reader | Swap | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |