John I think your HOPELESS you read into things WHAT YOU WANT THEM TO
BE .......... not what they are.

If the airwaves were 'free' there would NOT be any laws governing their
RECEPTION
but there is ( cell phones, cordless phones, pagers etc ) You need to
read the NEW communications laws since 1934 ( it has been added to and
things have changed since
then ...... but since your still concerned about WWII ( which was 60+ years
ago ) ) New things seem to elude you.



"honestjohn" wrote in message
et...

"labtech1" wrote in message

(b) If the offense is a first offense under paragraph (a) of this
subsection and is not for a tortious or illegal purpose or for purposes
of
direct or indirect commercial advantage or private commercial gain, and
the
wire or electronic communication with respect to which the offense under
paragraph (a) is a radio communication that is not scrambled, encrypted
or
transmitted using modulation techniques the essential parameters of
which
have been withheld from the public with the intention of preserving the
privacy of such communication, then--


"direct or indirect commercial advantage or private commercial gain"
Does not apply to any average "Joe" listening to a radio and not scheming
to
make a buck from what he hears!




Hmmm sounds like the FCC ( federal law ) IS telling you what you can
and
can not listen to.

Hmmm sounds like you need a little legal refresher course. The Germans
did
not win WWII, by the way. The airwaves are still free as you posted in
the
previous post. Get a reality check and take a nap before your "feeding
frenzy" causes you to stroke-out!

H.J.

"labtech1" wrote in message
...
John I think your HOPELESS you read into things WHAT YOU WANT THEM TO
BE .......... not what they are.

If the airwaves were 'free' there would NOT be any laws governing their
RECEPTION
but there is ( cell phones, cordless phones, pagers etc ) You need to
read the NEW communications laws since 1934 ( it has been added to and
things have changed since
then ...... but since your still concerned about WWII ( which was 60+
years
ago ) ) New things seem to elude you.


Have you ever heard of anyone arrested or convicted of unscrambling a
scrambled message?

Are the FBI agents going to "bug" every home in America with listening
devices to see who unscrambled a message?

Is your name really Chicken Little yelling the sky is falling?

Get a grip, any laws are aimed at criminals and those who make and sell
communications equipment and not the average individual in his own house
listening to the scanner.

Take your lithium.

HJ

"labtech1" wrote in message
...
your a riot

READ the wording and use your head and common sense when reading it

IT SAYS :
(v) for other users of the same frequency to intercept any radio
communication made through a system that utilizes frequencies monitored by
individuals engaged in the provision or the use of such system, if such
communication is not scrambled or encrypted.

Yep its LEGAL ...... IF communications ARE NOT ENCRYPTED or SCRAMBLED

Have you ever heard of anyone arrested or convicted of unscrambling a
scrambled message?

Are the FBI agents going to "bug" every home in America with listening
devices to see who unscrambled a message?

Is your name really Chicken Little yelling the sky is falling?

Get a grip, any laws are aimed at criminals and those who make and sell
communications equipment and not the average individual in his own house
listening to the scanner.

Take your lithium.

HJ

"labtech1" wrote in message
...
ok you have convinced me you're a RETARD

The conversation wasn't 'its only a crime if your caught'. It was about
WHAT IS THE LAW and I don't see any Attorny prefix in front of your name.
You jump from one subject to another to suit your arguement and convice
people you 'know what your talking about'
Unfortunatly YOU DON"T .

OK, you have convinced me you're a RETARD.

I don't see any Attorny prefix in front of your name, wtf is an "attorny
prefix". How old are you, 12?

H.J.

"labtech1" wrote in message

Again....... you're a RETARD

BTW do you also go by the nick 'Slowcode' ?????

No I don't, 12 year-old retard.

H.J.

ok you have convinced me you're a RETARD

The conversation wasn't 'its only a crime if your caught'. It was about
WHAT IS THE LAW and I don't see any Attorny prefix in front of your name.
You jump from one subject to another to suit your arguement and convice
people you 'know what your talking about'
Unfortunatly YOU DON"T .

"honestjohn" wrote in message
...

"labtech1" wrote in message
...
your a riot

READ the wording and use your head and common sense when reading it

IT SAYS :
(v) for other users of the same frequency to intercept any radio
communication made through a system that utilizes frequencies monitored
by
individuals engaged in the provision or the use of such system, if such
communication is not scrambled or encrypted.

Yep its LEGAL ...... IF communications ARE NOT ENCRYPTED or SCRAMBLED

Have you ever heard of anyone arrested or convicted of unscrambling a
scrambled message?

Are the FBI agents going to "bug" every home in America with listening
devices to see who unscrambled a message?

Is your name really Chicken Little yelling the sky is falling?

Get a grip, any laws are aimed at criminals and those who make and sell
communications equipment and not the average individual in his own house
listening to the scanner.

Take your lithium.

HJ

Again....... you're a RETARD

BTW do you also go by the nick 'Slowcode' ?????


"honestjohn" wrote in message
et...

"labtech1" wrote in message
...
John I think your HOPELESS you read into things WHAT YOU WANT THEM
TO
BE .......... not what they are.

If the airwaves were 'free' there would NOT be any laws governing their
RECEPTION
but there is ( cell phones, cordless phones, pagers etc ) You need
to
read the NEW communications laws since 1934 ( it has been added to and
things have changed since
then ...... but since your still concerned about WWII ( which was 60+
years
ago ) ) New things seem to elude you.


Have you ever heard of anyone arrested or convicted of unscrambling a
scrambled message?

Are the FBI agents going to "bug" every home in America with listening
devices to see who unscrambled a message?

Is your name really Chicken Little yelling the sky is falling?

Get a grip, any laws are aimed at criminals and those who make and sell
communications equipment and not the average individual in his own house
listening to the scanner.

Take your lithium.

HJ

"labtech1" wrote in message

Simple solution to this one 'honestjohn' in the filter list

I thought that autistic 12 year old would never leave!

What happens in your own home, stays in your home! Even decoding messages.

H.J. (made and sold unscramblers for 8 yrs. and paid an atty. to interpret
the laws)

p.s. Don't tell Chicken Little, he'll cry!

Simple solution to this one 'honestjohn' in the filter list

BTW Attorney Honest John would be a THE prefix

But they don't give sheepskins to RETARDS

"honestjohn" wrote in message
et...

"labtech1" wrote in message

Again....... you're a RETARD

BTW do you also go by the nick 'Slowcode' ?????

No I don't, 12 year-old retard.

H.J.