If you hate CW or are too dumb or lazy to learn it, your retard ass needs
to stick with scanners, shortwave, cell phones, and CB. We don't need you
in ham radio.

SC

Troll, troll, troll your boat....


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
If you hate CW or are too dumb or lazy to learn it, your retard ass needs
to stick with scanners, shortwave, cell phones, and CB. We don't need you
in ham radio.

SC

"DougSlug" wrote in
:

Troll, troll, troll your boat....


Stick with listening to police, fireman, baby monitors, and fast food
joints on a scanner, you're too lazy to be a good ham.


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
If you hate CW or are too dumb or lazy to learn it, your retard ass
needs to stick with scanners, shortwave, cell phones, and CB. We don't
need you in ham radio.

SC

Either a troll or somebody who REALLY hates ham radio. Must be a
troll, just look at his behavior here. Off-topic messages are just as
bad as transmitting on an unauthorized frequency, something a QUALITY
ham would not do. Blurts out insults when asked to back up anything he
says, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that he doesn't give a rats
ass about ham radio then continues to pollute off-topic newsgroups.

SC is the type not welcome amongst good ham radio operators. He is
just a simple obvious troll who is out to kill ham radio by making ham
radio operators look so awful. A REAL ham would never act like such a
boor.

Just a simple troll who knows nothing about radios in general nor
knows how to use one properly. He has proven it himself.


On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:43:04 -0500, "DougSlug"
spake thusly:

Troll, troll, troll your boat....


"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
If you hate CW or are too dumb or lazy to learn it, your retard ass needs
to stick with scanners, shortwave, cell phones, and CB. We don't need you
in ham radio.

SC


--

(Jim, single dad to Lesleigh [Autistic] 04/20/94)

"What, Me Worry?" A. E. Newman

Please note: All unsolicited e-mail sent to me may, at
my discretion, be posted in this newsgroup verbatim.

To All,

I found that the " blocked sender " feature in Outlook Express is of
tremendous help in all of the above groups.

b.j.


--
Reality is an hallucination brought
about by the lack of GOOD BEER !

The trouble with a code is that it is designed to keep people out. Once
you've learned the 'secret' code, it makes you feel that you have
something that you, and a select group of others can participate in.
Once you're up there, see how quickly you pull the ladder up.
Does a proficiency in CW make for a better operator? Yes, in a way. It
shows a studious interest in the hobby and is a worth achievement but
does it make a more courtious or interesting operator? Certainly not,
and this group is witness to that.
"People who don't use code are lazy", What? Is that the only discipline
available to allow someone to experiment with radio? Absolutely not!
How about learning electronics and building your own equipment? Is that
a lesser or a greater achievement?
How about taking the hobby forward by progressing and leading cutting
edge technologies? It was after all the amateur fraternity who brought
this new fangled SSB phone mode. Were are at the dawn of a new digital
age on all you people can do is look backwards and remain firmly rooted
in the seventeenth century.
Come on, wake up and smell the 21st century.

Juan Skinner wrote:
The trouble with a code is that it is designed to keep people out. Once
you've learned the 'secret' code, it makes you feel that you have
something that you, and a select group of others can participate in.
Once you're up there, see how quickly you pull the ladder up.
Does a proficiency in CW make for a better operator? Yes, in a way. It
shows a studious interest in the hobby and is a worth achievement but
does it make a more courtious or interesting operator? Certainly not,
and this group is witness to that.
"People who don't use code are lazy", What? Is that the only discipline
available to allow someone to experiment with radio? Absolutely not!
How about learning electronics and building your own equipment? Is that
a lesser or a greater achievement?
How about taking the hobby forward by progressing and leading cutting
edge technologies? It was after all the amateur fraternity who brought
this new fangled SSB phone mode. Were are at the dawn of a new digital
age on all you people can do is look backwards and remain firmly rooted
in the seventeenth century.

SSB is a period stain on the panties of radio communication. I hate
SSB. I prefer narrowband FM, or AM even, for quality and lack of
annying squawk. Baudot RTTY is fun too.

Make people build something to get the General license and make them
show competence to where a two way or broadcast facility would hire
them for the Extra.

"The True Ham Builds!"

"Juan Skinner" wrote in
ups.com:

The trouble with a code is that it is designed to keep people out. Once
you've learned the 'secret' code, it makes you feel that you have
something that you, and a select group of others can participate in.
Once you're up there, see how quickly you pull the ladder up.
Does a proficiency in CW make for a better operator? Yes, in a way. It
shows a studious interest in the hobby and is a worth achievement but
does it make a more courtious or interesting operator? Certainly not,
and this group is witness to that.
"People who don't use code are lazy", What? Is that the only discipline
available to allow someone to experiment with radio? Absolutely not!
How about learning electronics and building your own equipment? Is that
a lesser or a greater achievement?
How about taking the hobby forward by progressing and leading cutting
edge technologies? It was after all the amateur fraternity who brought
this new fangled SSB phone mode. Were are at the dawn of a new digital
age on all you people can do is look backwards and remain firmly rooted
in the seventeenth century.
Come on, wake up and smell the 21st century.


It's got to be incorporated into the exams then, otherwise hams aren't
going to learn and do it. If ham radio is to modernize hams must be
forced to modernize. CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio,
Laziness is.

Look at the no-coders on the repeaters. Many of them have been licensed
for years and they ain't moderizating. They're no better than they were
the day they were first licensed.

The passing score on written exams need to be 85% and double the number of
questions on each test element.

I push for quality hams. If you don't like quality there is CB. Let's
not turn the ham bands into CB

SC

Slow Idiot:

1) Get a life!
2) Get a news group! (might I suggest rec.radio.amateur.cw? Of course, you
will have to found this new group.)

I am sure there are just thousands waiting in the wings to join a newsgroup
devoted to cw!

JS

"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Juan Skinner" wrote in
ups.com:

The trouble with a code is that it is designed to keep people out. Once
you've learned the 'secret' code, it makes you feel that you have
something that you, and a select group of others can participate in.
Once you're up there, see how quickly you pull the ladder up.
Does a proficiency in CW make for a better operator? Yes, in a way. It
shows a studious interest in the hobby and is a worth achievement but
does it make a more courtious or interesting operator? Certainly not,
and this group is witness to that.
"People who don't use code are lazy", What? Is that the only discipline
available to allow someone to experiment with radio? Absolutely not!
How about learning electronics and building your own equipment? Is that
a lesser or a greater achievement?
How about taking the hobby forward by progressing and leading cutting
edge technologies? It was after all the amateur fraternity who brought
this new fangled SSB phone mode. Were are at the dawn of a new digital
age on all you people can do is look backwards and remain firmly rooted
in the seventeenth century.
Come on, wake up and smell the 21st century.


It's got to be incorporated into the exams then, otherwise hams aren't
going to learn and do it. If ham radio is to modernize hams must be
forced to modernize. CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio,
Laziness is.

Look at the no-coders on the repeaters. Many of them have been licensed
for years and they ain't moderizating. They're no better than they were
the day they were first licensed.

The passing score on written exams need to be 85% and double the number of
questions on each test element.

I push for quality hams. If you don't like quality there is CB. Let's
not turn the ham bands into CB

SC

"John Smith" wrote in
:

Slow Idiot:

1) Get a life!
2) Get a news group! (might I suggest rec.radio.amateur.cw? Of course,
you will have to found this new group.)

I am sure there are just thousands waiting in the wings to join a
newsgroup devoted to cw!

JS


ROFL,

I bet it just ****es your lazy ass off you gotta learn something to get on
HF. Be happy, they dumbed things down for ya.

SC