Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 23rd 03, 12:48 AM
King Pineapple
 
Posts: n/a
Default Georgie Bush, ever the dodo



a war we started based on lies by our President.


OK, I'll play. Name the "lies" that we "started" the war with, and back them
up with credible evidence, NOT with tired screeds by Robert Scheer, whom I
have already totally discredited here.

And while you're at it, explain why your fellow Democrats, including most of
the Democrats in Congress, *believed* those Bush "lies" then, and why you
believed them then, too.

Remember, they all had access to the SAME intelligence reports that Bush had
access to. Of course, the same can't be said of you.....





  #2   Report Post  
Old July 24th 03, 10:28 PM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Julie,

IIRC - A couple of days ago you posted, that your work was done here,
and you were going away.

So... What Happen ?
- - - Or Was That Simply "Pineapple Speak" )


jftfoi ~ RHF
- - - Just For The Fun Of It !
..
..
= = = Julie
= = = wrote in message . ..
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 25th 03, 03:54 PM
MJC
 
Posts: n/a
Default


GM,
we will never get this newsgroup back until NO ONE directly answers
troll posts.
(Note that I am not answering the troll; I'm answering you and making a
counter point to yours.)

If someone wants to talk ABOUT a troll, that's stupid, but fine, it's a free
group that way.
But until you make the effort to educate and convince all of the "regulars"
in this group that they should never directly answer a troll, then we won't
get the group back.

All it will take is for the regulars to simply take just one look at
whatever new post by this (and others) twit and ignore it. Then you never
have to go back to anything with that subject again. It would be especially
helpful if regulars would use their filters to dump any messages with the
usual key words in them that have nothing to do with SW. Then, review all
the rest of what's relevant for the day, mark them "All read" and come back
later.

It's only because the troll gets a response that he sticks around, and
obviously, he's sticking around because he's getting the attention he wants.
We all know that the guy who has used all the alias's mentioned below really
has more fun masturbating with a picture of Janet Reno in front of him, but
his juvenile yearning for attention gets the better of him when that gets
tiring. That's why we'll keep seeing him until he can be totally ignored.

MJC

"GM" wrote in message
...
On 24 Jul 2003 23:38:33 GMT, (Ho Ho) wrote:

On 24 Jul 2003 22:17:16 GMT, Agent Smith

wrote:

Don't you be dissin Julie. She be my new ho!


Yep. A ho is the only "woman" you will ever get. It must suck to be
you.


You are a troll. You post from alt.net and usenetserver.com. You
aren't fooling anyone. We are taking this newsgroup back and nothing
you can do will stop that.

These are the handles you have used in the past couple of months
including but not limited to--

666

Abdullah Mutlag Naser Mussaed Hawran Shbeib Al-Mutairi


Abdullah Mutlag Naser Mussaed Hawran Shbeib Al-Mutairi


Anon

Anon

Anus On Line
Aunt Bea

Barabbas

BARF

Big Al

Bob

Bob Badblood

Bubba

Bojangles

Claude

Dave Allan

David

DimmyDimwitt

Dobbie

Don Souter

Doug Martin

eaxxyz3

Ed Norton

Enrique Sanchez

Erasmo Hernandez

Firebottle

Floppy Disk

Fwankie

Goodfellows Rule

Goodie Two Shoes

Groan!

Guffaw!!!

Harley1200

Henry

Herb

Ho Ho

Howie

Itell On4zzabc

Itell OnU

I Zorg

Joe Partlan
King Creole

Lloyd

Lloyd

Lloyd/AB4NW
mmmm
Llyod
mmmm
L Rod Hubbard

Mark Mansfield

Miami Bob

Momma Moron

nookie

Nutcase Bobby

Onxyzzy

Pabst Smear

Pappy

Pat Carter

Patrick C

PCarter

Petey Arnett

Poo Bear

Q
ywhere
QRM Billy

QRP

Queenie

Randy Thomas

Rasheed

Ray Dude

Reactance

Richard W

Rob

Roger

Roger

Ron \"Stompin\" James

Sadiq Akhbar

Sammie Adams

Sammy Davis Sr.

Savant

Scammer

SLee

Stagger Lee

Stu Parker

The Moron List
_
Timmie TwoShoes

Trash Radio

Troll

Virgil

Voila!

What A HOOT!!!

Zippo

zzabc





  #4   Report Post  
Old July 26th 03, 05:57 AM
Telamon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "MJC"
wrote:

GM, we will never get this newsgroup back until NO ONE directly
answers troll posts. (Note that I am not answering the troll; I'm
answering you and making a counter point to yours.)


GM is another Troll so don't answer him either.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #5   Report Post  
Old August 2nd 03, 07:24 AM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mark Fox" wrote:

Think farther down the road, Dwight.



I am thinking down the road, Mark. If our nation's government can use
false information as justification to invade a country, it can use false
information as justification to invade ANY country. How can we ever know for
sure our government is telling the truth when they make claims about threats
in the future? For that matter, how can we know our government is telling
the truth about the other things they say Saddam did (killing his own
people, torture, and so on)? Sorry, I don't like what I see down THAT road.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/



  #6   Report Post  
Old August 2nd 03, 02:14 PM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dwight Stewart wrote in message ...
"Mark Fox" wrote:

Think farther down the road, Dwight.



DS,

You keep repeating the same 'mis-statement' about false information.

It was British Intelligence Information.

The BBC tried to Cook-Up a Story about it being 'Sexed-Up' and got
Cock-Up in their own Lies.

The British Government Stands by their original report and
'background' sources.

Blair Still Stands and Leads !
- - - The BBC is Dis-Credited [.]

Bush Still Stands and Leads !
- The Democrat's Leadership Remains . . .
- - Dis-Associated and Un-Able to Connect with the
- - - Hearts and Minds of the American Peoples.

Peace Through Strength ~ RHF



I am thinking down the road, Mark. If our nation's government can use
false information as justification to invade a country, it can use false
information as justification to invade ANY country. How can we ever know for
sure our government is telling the truth when they make claims about threats
in the future? For that matter, how can we know our government is telling
the truth about the other things they say Saddam did (killing his own
people, torture, and so on)? Sorry, I don't like what I see down THAT road.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

  #7   Report Post  
Old August 16th 03, 04:47 AM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mark Fox" wrote:

We Aren't ignoring any facts.

We are ignoring your opinion that you
have attempted to pass off as fact.



We? Unless you have multiple personalities, one person, yourself, does not
add up to "we." And, after posting several messages, you're not exactly
ignoring anything either.


And I find your (as of yet) unfounded
opinion that the President is a liar to
be disrespectful and reckless if not
traitorous.



Don't be silly, Mark. Simple words are not treason in this country, at
least not yet. If you want to change that, you'll have to change the
Constitution first. And I don't think you'll find much support for that.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

  #8   Report Post  
Old August 20th 03, 02:25 AM
Mark Fox
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dwight Stewart wrote in message


(snip) Your thinking that "weapons unseen are weapons
that don't exist" is irrational. (snip)


Do you really think the "whole world" agrees with your views? Boy, are
you going to be really surprised when reality checks in.


You mean like when the world trade center fell and three thousand
people died. I also believe on the same day the Pentagon was under
attack. Do you mean a reality check like that, Dwight?


Again, I did not say the president was lying. I said it appears he was
lying. Do you not understand basic English? Get a dictionary ...


Again, I did not say the president was lying. I said it appears he was
lying. Do you not understand basic English? Again, get a dictionary and look
up ....


And that ends my response to your accusations. ..if all you want

to do is
attack me, you'll have to look elsewhere for a response.
Great. I will look forward to no more posts from
you on this topic.


Great. I will look forward to no more posts from
you on this topic.


As I said, I don't intend to continue responding to your

accusations - but

Damn! I wanted to trust your word but In the back of my
mind I knew you were lying about making no more posts.


Nonsense, Mark. Contrary to your claim, my message clearly said ...


But, in spite of that, you continue to post negative comments about me ..


Sorry, Dwight, You are right.... I shouldn't have said you were a
liar.

I should have said you APPEAR to be a liar! Get a dictionary and look
it up!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? Roger Gt General 10 December 17th 03 09:50 PM
SURPRISE!! As 2004 Nears, Bush Pins Slump on Clinton Don Souter General 0 July 3rd 03 03:14 PM
SURPRISE!! As 2004 Nears, Bush Pins Slump on Clinton Don Souter Scanner 0 July 3rd 03 03:14 PM
Bush Caters to the Extremist Right Wing Wilf Kelly General 0 July 1st 03 12:12 PM
Bush Caters to the Extremist Right Wing Wilf Kelly Scanner 0 July 1st 03 12:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017