Smirking College Kid "Crazy Taxi" wrote in message
news:cWV2ZXJ5.827f78c3999d197c1a8fb37aa88a7e5a@105 9910899.cotse.net...

Analysis:

And nothing more.

BTW, I lost some recent newsgroup messages from you idiots re. the 2000
Florida recount. Please accept this as my response.

You're asking all of us rational people here to IGNORE the findings of a
*Clinton* appointee to the Justice Department (Assistant Attorney General
Ralph Boyd, whose resume speaks for itself. Look it up some time), and
instead ACCEPT the findings of ONE leftist reporter who can't even get a job
in the United States (Palast). You're telling us that Boyd is lying and
Palast is telling the truth, which is a laugh and a half.

I have a couple of questions for you.

First of all, how come Palast is the ONLY "source" you howler monkeys can
repeatedly cite on this issue to support your side of the 2000 Florida
story? And please don't reply with a question, namely why I am accepting the
findings of Boyd and Boyd alone. *His* investigation employed more than one
person, and his credibility is not in doubt, except to you idiots who call
him a liar and worse (one idiot I debated with even called him an "Uncle
Tom"). Meanwhile, Palast has been exposed in the past for lying in print
about Cynthia McKinney.

Secondly, why didn't you guys complain about the alleged scrubbing of felons
from the Florida voting rolls BEFORE the election? Because you knew you
would win anyway via vote fraud?

Which leads us to question #3. How come the Democratic Party, either
nationally or locally, NEVER sued for alleged vote fraud in Florida, or
anywhere else for that matter, after the 2000 election? I'll tell you why.
Because they were AFRAID to do so.



"You can change the outcome of any election you want" -Bill Clinton