Really?? Only 28% of your CPU?? Huuummm
http://webpages.charter.net/moment/1winscan780.htm
Even they, i.e. Pozilla state it has a problem using all your CPU and they
are trying to bring it down to 40% or 50% but it will not do real time
moniting and not use 100% of your CPU at this time, that is if you can get
it to run at all.

I agree Burr. I've had nothing but good luck with Winscan. I don't
think I have ever had it crash and as far as processor usage, right
now I've got Outlook Express and Winscan open and I'm only using 28%
of my CPU. I have to say that I think it also really adds to the
enjoyment of scanning.

Chris...

--
That Other George

Please send your spam to:

http://webpages.charter.net/moment/

http://webpages.charter.net/moment/winjunk.htm

I keep replying and it keeps not posting it.

I really do run that. I was trying to attach a image showing my CPU usage
at a nice 32% but I think that's why it wasn't posting. However... I think
that you are talking about Winscan 780 and Burr and I are talking about 2.1.
I don't know what Dwayne is talking about.

Chris.

"That Other George" wrote in message
...
Really?? Only 28% of your CPU?? Huuummm
http://webpages.charter.net/moment/1winscan780.htm
Even they, i.e. Pozilla state it has a problem using all your CPU and they
are trying to bring it down to 40% or 50% but it will not do real time
moniting and not use 100% of your CPU at this time, that is if you can get
it to run at all.

I agree Burr. I've had nothing but good luck with Winscan. I don't
think I have ever had it crash and as far as processor usage, right
now I've got Outlook Express and Winscan open and I'm only using 28%
of my CPU. I have to say that I think it also really adds to the
enjoyment of scanning.

Chris...

--
That Other George

Please send your spam to:

http://webpages.charter.net/moment/

http://webpages.charter.net/moment/winjunk.htm

soundisgood wrote:

I keep replying and it keeps not posting it.

I really do run that. I was trying to attach a image showing my CPU usage
at a nice 32% but I think that's why it wasn't posting. However... I think
that you are talking about Winscan 780 and Burr and I are talking about 2.1.
I don't know what Dwayne is talking about.

Chris.

Chris,
I don't know what to say. I run all the programs I want at
the sametime with Winscan and I run fast and I don't have
problems.
I never heard you say anything about loading up your computer
so I don't know why these other people are having problems.

Burr

I don't get it either Burr. I wish I could say what the problem is. I
searched google and altavista and can't say that I saw anything about a CPU
problem. I did however read the Strong Signals review of v1.1 and they seem
to like it. I can also show that I don't have that problem

http://www.soundisgood.com/scanner/winscanimage.htm

Maybe Dwayne is having some sort of problem with his supercomputer.

By the way... Thanks for the tip about the posting Dwayne.

Chris.


"Burr" wrote in message
...


soundisgood wrote:

I keep replying and it keeps not posting it.

I really do run that. I was trying to attach a image showing my CPU
usage
at a nice 32% but I think that's why it wasn't posting. However... I
think
that you are talking about Winscan 780 and Burr and I are talking about
2.1.
I don't know what Dwayne is talking about.

Chris.

Chris,
I don't know what to say. I run all the programs I want at
the sametime with Winscan and I run fast and I don't have
problems.
I never heard you say anything about loading up your computer
so I don't know why these other people are having problems.

Burr

In article ,
says...
I don't get it either Burr. I wish I could say what the problem is. I
searched google and altavista and can't say that I saw anything about a CPU
problem. I did however read the Strong Signals review of v1.1 and they seem
to like it. I can also show that I don't have that problem

http://www.soundisgood.com/scanner/winscanimage.htm

Maybe Dwayne is having some sort of problem with his supercomputer.

By the way... Thanks for the tip about the posting Dwayne.

Chris.


Here are some links to screenshots I took of other programs running. As
you can see they use up way less cpu then Winscan does. The first one is
what Winscan used to be before Pozilla got a hold of it.

PC895
http://ssrleague1.homestead.com/files/Scanner/pc895.JPG
BC245INT
http://ssrleague1.homestead.com/file...r/BC245int.JPG
ScanCat Gold
http://ssrleague1.homestead.com/file...er/scancat.JPG
ScanControl
http://ssrleague1.homestead.com/file...cancontrol.JPG
TrunkStar780
http://ssrleague1.homestead.com/file.../Trunkstar.JPG
Unitrol
http://ssrleague1.homestead.com/file...er/Unitrol.JPG

Dwayne
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BC895/

Hey Dwayne:

I found this sweet little "FREE" program and we did some testing on it.
Works really well for what it is.

http://webpages.charter.net/moment/cc780.htm



Dwayne wrote:




So did you write a new program or did you just make winscam frequency
file?


Well, guess I just wrote a Winscan frequency file and am
running it both as stan alone in the BC 245 and with my PC
Laptop as a monitor of what's happening.
Are you the person that loves Winscan so mush, got it all
figured out and running it everyday. It sure is a nice
program and it runs real well, I just love running it!!

Burr


I cant stand winscan. No support from the company and it uses almost
100% of your cpu. Best I found so far for the 245 is bc245int, and its
free.



--
That Other George

Please send your spam to:

http://webpages.charter.net/moment/

http://webpages.charter.net/moment/winjunk.htm