Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Article link:
http://www.strongsignals.net/access/news/news. cgi?type=single§ion=radio&entry=1152 Copy and past link if needed. Mo http://www.police-scanner.info/scanning/rs-gre.htm http://powerhousecb.tripod.com/images/Pro-96-1.jpg Although I laud the availability of Digital Trunk Tracking radios, they (those responsible for decisions at the Public Service Level) have relegated Scanning Radios to the level of computers, where one will no doubt have to buy a new unit every several years to keep up with the changing formats. (if we are luck enough for the government to deign that we can listen, and if they don't encrypt all transmissions, and if they don't criminalize the mere ownership of scanning radios. I can see it now, the scanning radio task force, where your neighbor will get 1 year of free cable if they turn you in for having an illegal radio, hell, people will be turning you in for suspicious clothes lines, lest they actually be concealed antennas). And the fun is just beginning, digital AM/FM, digital shortwave, etc. These heathens have assured that any of us that collect radios will have totally useless units, useful for museum pieces only. One of the proponents of digital AM/FM radio systems said that the transition from analog to digital will generate the sale of an additional 2.x billion radios. It's nice to see that U.S. authorities are so concerned about the Chinese economy, because they sure won't be made here. In article , Keith wrote: http://strongsignals.net/ Apparently Wells has obtained a PRO-96 and they will be on sale in a couple of weeks. Never say never. Nothing is absolute. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How's Betty?
Anyway, it actually looks Retro if you can ignore the pushbuttons. Not exactly what we're accustomed to, but, as with mold, it may grow on you. Its ease of use remains to be seen. I just bought the Uniden 785D (about 6 months ago) and it's a learning curve. I'm convinced that they failed to correctly execute the Weather Alert Features, and have written exhaustively to Uniden about this. They steadfastly believe themselves to be correct. I believe that someone is going to get hurt if they rely on the Weather Alert feature. I have gone so far as to contact the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and am actually awaiting a response from Uniden before pursuing it further. So many of the newer technologies have been inadequately thought out, daytime driving lights on vehicles for one. So many people now drive at night without turning on the headlights because A: The lights are sufficient for them to see forwards. B: Many cars have digital dashboards, and the information is there without additional lighting from the dashlights of old. As a result, an increasing amount of cars can be seen driving through the city without any taillights. (They never turned on the headlights). Oooops. You'd think that someone would discover this, but noooo. Modern engineers rely too much on computers and too little in common sense. Take a drive through a modern parking lot. The engineers drew the plans for it from a directly overhead perspective, see how easy the traffic flows. But to us suckers at ground level, some of the parking lots seem almost impossible to navigate. Save us from the modern engineer. Regards. In article , "Bill Crocker" wrote: It's God awful ugly! Must have been designed by some Pimp-Daddy! Bill Crocker http://powerhousecb.tripod.com/images/Pro-96-1.jpg Never say never. Nothing is absolute. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doesn't work for me either. I hate computers.
http://www.strongsignals.net/access/news/news. cgi?type=single§ion=radio&entry=1153 Today it seems to be ending with 1153 rather than 1152. Is this a scheme to keep people from linking directly to the article rather than the main page? I'll try again later to see the results. Regards. In article , "PowerHouse CB & Scanner" wrote: Its (The Dawn Soliloquy) wrote in message ... Article link: http://www.strongsignals.net/access/news/news. cgi?type=single§ion=radio&entry=1152 Copy and past link if needed. Link didn't work for me... Oh well... Never say never. Nothing is absolute. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith" wrote in message
... http://strongsignals.net/ Apparently Wells has obtained a PRO-96 and they will be on sale in a couple of weeks. The Pro-96 is on sale now by phone order, no "batch limits". Details at: Pro-96 Digital Scanner Information Page http://www.police-scanner.info/scanning/rs-gre.htm Also, FreqOfNature.com has a side-by-side comparison at: http://www.freqofnature.com/resource..._vs_pro96.html -RF =============================== Forget Milk, Got Scanner? http://www.Police-Scanner.info =============================== Email reply to: ruben "at" police-scanner.info |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
some batlabs info on digital signal technology | General | |||
What about digital radio? | Antenna | |||
digital scanner help | Scanner | |||
looking for new digital scanner (Canada) | Scanner | |||
Need Johnson Scanner info | Scanner |