Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
My friend has an unblocked scanner and can only hear one side of the conversation (cell). Yes, he is listening to the base, not the mobile frequencies. He says he thinks he is hearing the land line side of the conversation only because he will hear a tech support guy or a business talking at times. What can I tell him? ![]() thx bob |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "steelguitar" wrote in message ink.net... Hi My friend has an unblocked scanner and can only hear one side of the conversation (cell). Yes, he is listening to the base, not the mobile frequencies. He says he thinks he is hearing the land line side of the conversation only because he will hear a tech support guy or a business talking at times. What can I tell him? It's illegal. Also he may be in for an into court walk if he squalks about the talk. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 03:46:16 GMT, "Paul Keenleyside"
wrote: "steelguitar" wrote in message link.net... Hi My friend has an unblocked scanner and can only hear one side of the conversation (cell). Yes, he is listening to the base, not the mobile frequencies. He says he thinks he is hearing the land line side of the conversation only because he will hear a tech support guy or a business talking at times. What can I tell him? It's illegal. He was asking about the technology which effectively put an end to cellular monitoring, not about the law, which did not do anything meaningful to stop the practice of cellular monitoring. Every time someone brings up cellular monitoring, or file trading, some twit just has to pipe in with, "b-b-b-but that's illegal! sniffle". Why do you ninnies think anyone cares about laws, against harmless activities, the violation of which is nearly impossible to detect? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 03:22:10 GMT, "steelguitar"
wrote: Hi My friend has an unblocked scanner and can only hear one side of the conversation (cell). Yes, he is listening to the base, not the mobile frequencies. He says he thinks he is hearing the land line side of the conversation only because he will hear a tech support guy or a business talking at times. What can I tell him? Take your pick: 1. Welcome to 2003, where cell monitoring is mostly a thing of the past. 2. Keep scanning, you might occasionally find someone using an older phone, and in that case you will hear both sides. 3. Get a second receiver, subtract 45 MHz from the base frequency, and listen for the mobile on that frequency. However, for this to work, he would need a very tall antenna, in a very strategic location. Remember, we're talking about low power devices. You may be able to hear the cell site miles away, but you will be lucky if the cell phone can be heard the same distance as an FRS radio can. 4. Try cordless instead. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Gary
Technically, exactly what is going on to prevent 2 sides of the call? thx bob Gary wrote: On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 03:22:10 GMT, "steelguitar" wrote: Hi My friend has an unblocked scanner and can only hear one side of the conversation (cell). Yes, he is listening to the base, not the mobile frequencies. He says he thinks he is hearing the land line side of the conversation only because he will hear a tech support guy or a business talking at times. What can I tell him? Take your pick: 1. Welcome to 2003, where cell monitoring is mostly a thing of the past. 2. Keep scanning, you might occasionally find someone using an older phone, and in that case you will hear both sides. 3. Get a second receiver, subtract 45 MHz from the base frequency, and listen for the mobile on that frequency. However, for this to work, he would need a very tall antenna, in a very strategic location. Remember, we're talking about low power devices. You may be able to hear the cell site miles away, but you will be lucky if the cell phone can be heard the same distance as an FRS radio can. 4. Try cordless instead. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Steve
So it never was possible to hear both sides of the conversation on one freq., even back in the analog only days? thx bob Steve Silverwood wrote: In article . net, says... Technically, exactly what is going on to prevent 2 sides of the call? Aside from the issues of being in range of the remote unit, the problem is that a mobile phone call operates on two frequencies. This is necessary so that it works like a regular phone call, with the party on one side being able to interrupt and the party on the other side able to hear the interruption even though (s)he is still talking. That's called full-duplex operation. With regular two-way radio, you both operate on the same frequency and only one can transmit at a time. The other party has to wait until the first person has stopped transmitting in order to be able to be heard by that person. In full-duplex, each side of the conversation has to be on a different frequency. You can't transmit and receive on the same frequency at the same time on the same antenna -- just doesn't work. The minute you transmitted, you'd be jamming yourself. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net,
says... So it never was possible to hear both sides of the conversation on one freq., even back in the analog only days? Only if you had two receivers, each tuned to one of the two frequencies involved. -- -- //Steve// Steve Silverwood, KB6OJS Fountain Valley, CA Email: Web: http://home.earthlink.net/~kb6ojs_steve |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |