Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi there. Sorry that my initial post was in error. My test-post worked
but not the actual one that I intended. I use to enjoy listening to scanners as a hobby. I own several eqarly-to-mid 90's scanners including an AOR 8000. Due to various life circumstances (marriage/divorce, work, family illness, etc.), I have not really had the time to do so for the last eight or nine years. As such, I am in a sense, an Oldie Newbie. A lot has apparently changed in the hobby since the mid-90's. I am hoping that someone can clarify some of the recent developments. I know that much of this has likely been discussed already but a Google search did not yeield the results that I was after. So please bare with me. 1. It appears that almost all 800 MHz broadcasts, particulalry you know what, are now digital. Theoretically (I know about "the Law"), are there any radios or devices that can decode the cellular band? Would the latest European versions of scanners work in that sense? 2. What exactly does a voice "inverter" do? 3. I was recently scanning the NYPD and they have not appeared to heave converted to digital. How essential is having trunking and digital capability in a scanner? I thank you all for your assistance and guidance. Happy Holidays to all. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll try my hand at some of this .. but in my neck of the woods they are
still using non-trunked analog for things I'm interested in so this may not be 100% and I'll watch the thread to get the rest of the story. 1) Listening to digital transmissions from just about any source is not within the capabilities of scanners available to the public for any reasonable amount of money. The transmitter and receiver link up/ synch up and share protocols which are not easily matched by universal scanning devices that you might get from RS etc. 2) Voice inversion is a (now) primitive form of encryption used for analog transmissions which can be easily un-done ... probably not many users of this technique anymore. 3) Most municipalities are headed toward trunking systems of some sort if they aren't already there .. but as in #1 above, if they have gone digital and trunked that can be tough to monitor. I wouldn't bother with a non-trunkable scanner any more. With the increasing use of digital by cops/fire etc. it is getting tougher to monitor government stuff .. but most of the cops around here use their cell phones so much that most of the traffic is on that system. "X" wrote in message m... Hi there. Sorry that my initial post was in error. My test-post worked but not the actual one that I intended. I use to enjoy listening to scanners as a hobby. I own several eqarly-to-mid 90's scanners including an AOR 8000. Due to various life circumstances (marriage/divorce, work, family illness, etc.), I have not really had the time to do so for the last eight or nine years. As such, I am in a sense, an Oldie Newbie. A lot has apparently changed in the hobby since the mid-90's. I am hoping that someone can clarify some of the recent developments. I know that much of this has likely been discussed already but a Google search did not yeield the results that I was after. So please bare with me. 1. It appears that almost all 800 MHz broadcasts, particulalry you know what, are now digital. Theoretically (I know about "the Law"), are there any radios or devices that can decode the cellular band? Would the latest European versions of scanners work in that sense? 2. What exactly does a voice "inverter" do? 3. I was recently scanning the NYPD and they have not appeared to heave converted to digital. How essential is having trunking and digital capability in a scanner? I thank you all for your assistance and guidance. Happy Holidays to all. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
nItpIk ...
^ .. but most of the cops around here use their ^ cell phones so much that most of the traffic is ^ on that system. And on their data terminals/computers. This is out of necessity because of the increased voice traffic that has become necessary. Cops today are tied to their radios like an umbilical. Every move must be reported and they are called frequently to see if they're OK. The increased traffic is also due to the increased availability of a 911 call. It used to be that if you saw someone speeding on the freeway there was nothing that you could do. By the time you got to a phone the vehicle would be long gone. Now every time someone sees a speeder they call in a dangerous driver, and every time someone gets flipped off they call in road rage. In order to get any time for communications cops need to resort to the cellular full-duplex radio system. The privacy of this system is also a convenience. Frank |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Try this site:
http://www.strongsignals.net/index.cgi Jim X wrote: Hi there. Sorry that my initial post was in error. My test-post worked but not the actual one that I intended. I use to enjoy listening to scanners as a hobby. I own several eqarly-to-mid 90's scanners including an AOR 8000. Due to various life circumstances (marriage/divorce, work, family illness, etc.), I have not really had the time to do so for the last eight or nine years. As such, I am in a sense, an Oldie Newbie. A lot has apparently changed in the hobby since the mid-90's. I am hoping that someone can clarify some of the recent developments. I know that much of this has likely been discussed already but a Google search did not yeield the results that I was after. So please bare with me. 1. It appears that almost all 800 MHz broadcasts, particulalry you know what, are now digital. Theoretically (I know about "the Law"), are there any radios or devices that can decode the cellular band? Would the latest European versions of scanners work in that sense? 2. What exactly does a voice "inverter" do? 3. I was recently scanning the NYPD and they have not appeared to heave converted to digital. How essential is having trunking and digital capability in a scanner? I thank you all for your assistance and guidance. Happy Holidays to all. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you all for your responses to my post. They were informative and helpful.
Happy Holidays. X Jim Mac Donald wrote in message ... Try this site: http://www.strongsignals.net/index.cgi Jim X wrote: Hi there. Sorry that my initial post was in error. My test-post worked but not the actual one that I intended. I use to enjoy listening to scanners as a hobby. I own several eqarly-to-mid 90's scanners including an AOR 8000. Due to various life circumstances (marriage/divorce, work, family illness, etc.), I have not really had the time to do so for the last eight or nine years. As such, I am in a sense, an Oldie Newbie. A lot has apparently changed in the hobby since the mid-90's. I am hoping that someone can clarify some of the recent developments. I know that much of this has likely been discussed already but a Google search did not yeield the results that I was after. So please bare with me. 1. It appears that almost all 800 MHz broadcasts, particulalry you know what, are now digital. Theoretically (I know about "the Law"), are there any radios or devices that can decode the cellular band? Would the latest European versions of scanners work in that sense? 2. What exactly does a voice "inverter" do? 3. I was recently scanning the NYPD and they have not appeared to heave converted to digital. How essential is having trunking and digital capability in a scanner? I thank you all for your assistance and guidance. Happy Holidays to all. |