| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
March 2nd 04, 10:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
UHF airband receivers
I am interested as to what people think is the best UHF airband receiver
available. I currently use a UBC780XLT for this range, but am considering an alternative. -- Regards Troy Rowland |
|
#2
March 2nd 04, 10:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Troy R. wrote: I am interested as to what people think is the best UHF airband receiver available. I currently use a UBC780XLT for this range, but am considering an alternative. The 780XLT is an excellent receiver for this range. I have 7 780's just for MilAir scanning. I also have several of the newer 250D's, and 785D's. The 785D's are junk in this range, the 250D's are pretty good, just one step below the 780. I also have PRO-2006's, PRO2035's, PRO26, PRO2052, and PRO2045's, all of which are older scanners and go well in this range. But from what I've seen so far in the shack the 780XLT has a slight advanage for pulling out the weak sigs and rejecting interference. As you can see my my shack photos I really like the 780XLT - http://www.MilAirComms.com/shack.html George http://www.MilAirComms.com |
|
#3
March 2nd 04, 08:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
GeorgeF wrote:
Troy R. wrote: I am interested as to what people think is the best UHF airband receiver available. I currently use a UBC780XLT for this range, but am considering an alternative. The 780XLT is an excellent receiver for this range. I have 7 780's just for MilAir scanning. I also have several of the newer 250D's, and 785D's. The 785D's are junk in this range, the 250D's are pretty good, just one step below the 780. I also have PRO-2006's, PRO2035's, PRO26, PRO2052, and PRO2045's, all of which are older scanners and go well in this range. But from what I've seen so far in the shack the 780XLT has a slight advanage for pulling out the weak sigs and rejecting interference. As you can see my my shack photos I really like the 780XLT - http://www.MilAirComms.com/shack.html George http://www.MilAirComms.com That's a serious setup you've got there! -- Tim Johns Worcestershire, UK |
|
#4
March 3rd 04, 11:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
As far as scanners go the 8200 AND 8600 AR I have found haVE super
sensitivity and handle strong ajacent chanel signals well for a broad band receiver. GEORDIE "Troy R." wrote in message u... I am interested as to what people think is the best UHF airband receiver available. I currently use a UBC780XLT for this range, but am considering an alternative. -- Regards Troy Rowland |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
