Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would keep the BC780's as they are far better radios than the BC796
which is less sensitive and has a slower computer interface. The BC780 is just a classic Uniden radio, best in its class when it was made. It makes a great MilAir radio and it is useful in scanning those LTR systems if you have any important ones in your area. This ham has seven BC780s! http://snipurl.com/6rp1 The BC796D may decode digital but it is bested by the PRO-96 digital scanner made by GRE which is easier to program and the PRO-96 sounds far better in digital mode. The PRO-96 has built in features like instant tone decode and the very important Sys ID scan to identify those trunking system control channels, a feature found only by running an external computer and a TRUNKER type program with a Uniden scanner. Add a PRO-96 which is destined to be a digital classic radio to your collection and keep at least one of your 780's and you have the best of both worlds, digital and analog. Ki4je |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
APRS Text versus MIC-E | Digital | |||
IC-735 versus IC-726 | Dx | |||
ic-735 versus ic-726 | General | |||
Access BPL NPRM versus NOI | Policy | |||
LDG AT-11MP versus SGC-230? | Antenna |