Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it really possible to use a scanner without being exposed? I heard
from few sources that scanners produce internal oscillator signals that can be detected. I suppose there is no "stealth" way to listen a scanner. Any ideas? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
Is it really possible to use a scanner without being exposed? I heard from few sources that scanners produce internal oscillator signals that can be detected. I suppose there is no "stealth" way to listen a scanner. Any ideas? Not sure exactly what you're asking... You can put the innards of the scanner into a Faraday cage and just run in the (shielded) antenna cable (perhaps with a notch filter to hammer the IF frequency(ies)) and run out (very low pass filtered) audio cables. Sure you'll have some small coupling back to the antenna and audio leads, but you could knock it way down. It really depends on what you consider the threat to be... I have a hard time imaging it to be an issue without serious cloak and dagger stuff going on. (In which case, there is probably specialized equipment...) -Donald -- "One ought, every day at least, to hear a little song, read a good poem, see a fine picture, and, if it were possible, to speak a few reasonable words." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim wrote: Is it really possible to use a scanner without being exposed? I heard from few sources that scanners produce internal oscillator signals that can be detected. I suppose there is no "stealth" way to listen a scanner. Any ideas? Trying to sneek a scanner (or other computing device) into a Casino???? Good Luck! George http://www.MilAirComms.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"GeorgeF" wrote in message
.. . Trying to sneek a scanner (or other computing device) into a Casino???? Good Luck! Sneak? I've walked for hours through the Trump Taj Majal in Atlantic City with a scanner on my belt. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it really possible to use a scanner without being exposed? I heard
from few sources that scanners produce internal oscillator signals that can be detected. aqnd my question is, does this screw up Smartsignmedia and Mobiltrak to detetrmine which radio station you're listening to? They're using machines to read the local osciallator on your car radio and looking 10.7 MHZ away to determine which radio station you're listening to. But they're looking for which radio station between 88 and 108 mhz you're listening to, so advertisers can target their advertising to you on freeway signs. But if you're listening to a scanner in your car instead of the car's radio, and if their machines can handle it, they'l get a frequency readout such as "144. 250 mhz" or "455.325 mhz", in which case they'll probably be scratching their heads and going "huh?" ![]() Since this would be an accurate readout of which station or frequency you're listening to, it doesn't really screw them up. It just confuses the heck out of them. ![]() However, my own scanner uses a local oscillater of 240.1 mhz, which I imagine probably would screw them up since their machines are looking for and reading as 10.7 mhz away from the local osciallator frequency. They would probably get a completely wrong readout of what station I'm listening to. Of course, this also has it's possible drawbacks |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay so if it is the fact that scanners produce IF, what is the range
of such signals produced by local oscillator? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
On 9 Jul 2004 18:21:25 -0700, (Jim) wrote: Is it really possible to use a scanner without being exposed? Perhaps you should wear better fitting clothes. Is that a rubber-ducky or are you happy to see me? =D -- "One ought, every day at least, to hear a little song, read a good poem, see a fine picture, and, if it were possible, to speak a few reasonable words." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote in news:8p4af01aqem8bqpcbiar9d519q66vojgav@
4ax.com: On 9 Jul 2004 18:21:25 -0700, (Jim) wrote: Is it really possible to use a scanner without being exposed? Perhaps you should wear better fitting clothes. There are some pretty small scanners available, I'm currently using an Icom R5 which is about the size of the smaller cellphones out today. You can get very small general use antennas as well, I use a 3/4inch one and a 1.5inch one for most things. Plug a discreet earphone into it and route the wire through your jacket and it looks as though your using a handsfree cellphone. Also, take a look at the Scott E-Vest http://www.scottevest.com/ for clothing that is somewhat 'stealthy' for carrying gear. -- ICQ: 4304313 Gadgets: Zen 20Gb/Shure E2/Ipaq 3850/Sharp 702 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wired one for most things. Plug a discreet earphone
Or get stereo walkman earphones, and tap your toes and snap your fingers, they'll never guess. A phony walkman dangling from your neck completes the picture. Or dress the scanner up as a walkman. A mono earphone here would be a dead giveaway. Older non toe tappers can dress up as a sports fan with an old AM radio clipped to their belt but the actual wire to the ear would be coming from the scanner, whilst the scanner is hidden in a pocket. Here we use an old white mono earphone. When the authorities come, slide the whole mess in your pants. the rubber ducky bulge is no problemo; "After the operation I was left with a permanent `boner'", you say. But as you have unfortunately dislodged the earphone jack, you are cut off by a gruff "1 Adam 12 see Mrs. Nurdsbury about stolen napkins, over" emulating from your trousers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Newbie to Scanning | Scanner | |||
Scanning in the Phoenix, Arizona metro area | Scanner | |||
Scanning this afternoon | Scanner | |||
Scanning laws around the world? | Scanner |