Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Loading up the VX-7R with emergency freqs for Tampa area - any opinions on
the best local AM emergency broadcast station? FM? I have all SkyWarn and amateur freqs, police and emergency and most of the major ones, but curious as to the best local AM emergency broadcast freqs for things such as road closings, traffic congestions, etc. The Yaesu VX-7R has become my fav radio for emergency situations - the only thing it won't do is trunk track. As soon as they come out with a trunk-tracking extended receive quad band amateur transceiver I am SOLD heh Thanks - |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ScanMan wrote:
As soon as they come out with a trunk-tracking extended receive quad band amateur transceiver I am SOLD heh Don't hold your breath. Trunking is an anathema to most hams. -D -- "One ought, every day at least, to hear a little song, read a good poem, see a fine picture, and, if it were possible, to speak a few reasonable words." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Loading up the VX-7R with emergency freqs for Tampa area - any opinions on
the best local AM emergency broadcast station? WFLA / 970 did a good job with hurricane coverage last week, before Charley came ashore. I can't tell you how good they are with traffic, news and weather on a normal basis, though. Interestingly, Clear Channel apparently fed WFLA's audio to some of the other AM and FM Clear Channel stations in the Tampa area during last Friday. WFLA uses different directional antenna patterns day and night, but I can't advise of how well their signal covers the Tampa region or state. They also webcast, which is what I was listening to last Friday, and the server connection was very solid throughout the day and evening. The audio level varied alot, though, and they transitioned between the studio personalities, location reports and commercials. Jeff Multer Fort Mill, S.C. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey thanks very much - will add that one to my list
"Jeff Multer" wrote in message ... Loading up the VX-7R with emergency freqs for Tampa area - any opinions on the best local AM emergency broadcast station? WFLA / 970 did a good job with hurricane coverage last week, before Charley came ashore. I can't tell you how good they are with traffic, news and weather on a normal basis, though. Interestingly, Clear Channel apparently fed WFLA's audio to some of the other AM and FM Clear Channel stations in the Tampa area during last Friday. WFLA uses different directional antenna patterns day and night, but I can't advise of how well their signal covers the Tampa region or state. They also webcast, which is what I was listening to last Friday, and the server connection was very solid throughout the day and evening. The audio level varied alot, though, and they transitioned between the studio personalities, location reports and commercials. Jeff Multer Fort Mill, S.C. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Funny, most hams I know are into trunking big time. But, most hams I know
are only into vhf/uhf comms as well. I suppose your observation would be the fact for most gen/extra class hams who operate mostly on HF. Haven't heard too many of them discuss trunking on their nets or elsewhere. Good point there. "Donald K" wrote in message ... ScanMan wrote: As soon as they come out with a trunk-tracking extended receive quad band amateur transceiver I am SOLD heh Don't hold your breath. Trunking is an anathema to most hams. -D -- "One ought, every day at least, to hear a little song, read a good poem, see a fine picture, and, if it were possible, to speak a few reasonable words." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Um,
Can you define what you mean by "trunking?" Do you mean listening to monitoring systems that are trunked, or do you mean using trunked ham radio systems? (I which case I've got a WHOLE BUNCH more questions to ask...) I am unaware of any hams using trunking for ham systems. Thus there is little drive to include trunking features into ham HTs. -D ScanMan wrote: Funny, most hams I know are into trunking big time. But, most hams I know are only into vhf/uhf comms as well. I suppose your observation would be the fact for most gen/extra class hams who operate mostly on HF. Haven't heard too many of them discuss trunking on their nets or elsewhere. Good point there. "Donald K" wrote in message ... ScanMan wrote: As soon as they come out with a trunk-tracking extended receive quad band amateur transceiver I am SOLD heh Don't hold your breath. Trunking is an anathema to most hams. -- "One ought, every day at least, to hear a little song, read a good poem, see a fine picture, and, if it were possible, to speak a few reasonable words." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, no, no - sorry, let me clarify - talking scanner vhf/uhf trunk tracking
here. Didn't mean to confuse - sorry bout that! Most vhf/uhf hams I know are into trunk-tracking scanners as well. "Donald K" wrote in message ... Um, Can you define what you mean by "trunking?" Do you mean listening to monitoring systems that are trunked, or do you mean using trunked ham radio systems? (I which case I've got a WHOLE BUNCH more questions to ask...) I am unaware of any hams using trunking for ham systems. Thus there is little drive to include trunking features into ham HTs. -D ScanMan wrote: Funny, most hams I know are into trunking big time. But, most hams I know are only into vhf/uhf comms as well. I suppose your observation would be the fact for most gen/extra class hams who operate mostly on HF. Haven't heard too many of them discuss trunking on their nets or elsewhere. Good point there. "Donald K" wrote in message ... ScanMan wrote: As soon as they come out with a trunk-tracking extended receive quad band amateur transceiver I am SOLD heh Don't hold your breath. Trunking is an anathema to most hams. -- "One ought, every day at least, to hear a little song, read a good poem, see a fine picture, and, if it were possible, to speak a few reasonable words." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey scan man... contact me direct... Got a ? for ya... remove the No Spam to
reply. I THINK you're the same one I'm looking for. We'll soon find out. Someone named Scan man was looking for something a while back... I have that item. E-mail me. L. "ScanMan" wrote in message ... No, no, no - sorry, let me clarify - talking scanner vhf/uhf trunk tracking here. Didn't mean to confuse - sorry bout that! Most vhf/uhf hams I know are into trunk-tracking scanners as well. "Donald K" wrote in message ... Um, Can you define what you mean by "trunking?" Do you mean listening to monitoring systems that are trunked, or do you mean using trunked ham radio systems? (I which case I've got a WHOLE BUNCH more questions to ask...) I am unaware of any hams using trunking for ham systems. Thus there is little drive to include trunking features into ham HTs. -D ScanMan wrote: Funny, most hams I know are into trunking big time. But, most hams I know are only into vhf/uhf comms as well. I suppose your observation would be the fact for most gen/extra class hams who operate mostly on HF. Haven't heard too many of them discuss trunking on their nets or elsewhere. Good point there. "Donald K" wrote in message ... ScanMan wrote: As soon as they come out with a trunk-tracking extended receive quad band amateur transceiver I am SOLD heh Don't hold your breath. Trunking is an anathema to most hams. -- "One ought, every day at least, to hear a little song, read a good poem, see a fine picture, and, if it were possible, to speak a few reasonable words." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newp wrong ScanMan guy. I don't look for anything on Usenet, stick mostly to
buying new or ebay, that's about it. Nothing I need at the moment, but thanks anyway! "L." wrote in message .net... Hey scan man... contact me direct... Got a ? for ya... remove the No Spam to reply. I THINK you're the same one I'm looking for. We'll soon find out. Someone named Scan man was looking for something a while back... I have that item. E-mail me. L. "ScanMan" wrote in message ... No, no, no - sorry, let me clarify - talking scanner vhf/uhf trunk tracking here. Didn't mean to confuse - sorry bout that! Most vhf/uhf hams I know are into trunk-tracking scanners as well. "Donald K" wrote in message ... Um, Can you define what you mean by "trunking?" Do you mean listening to monitoring systems that are trunked, or do you mean using trunked ham radio systems? (I which case I've got a WHOLE BUNCH more questions to ask...) I am unaware of any hams using trunking for ham systems. Thus there is little drive to include trunking features into ham HTs. -D ScanMan wrote: Funny, most hams I know are into trunking big time. But, most hams I know are only into vhf/uhf comms as well. I suppose your observation would be the fact for most gen/extra class hams who operate mostly on HF. Haven't heard too many of them discuss trunking on their nets or elsewhere. Good point there. "Donald K" wrote in message ... ScanMan wrote: As soon as they come out with a trunk-tracking extended receive quad band amateur transceiver I am SOLD heh Don't hold your breath. Trunking is an anathema to most hams. -- "One ought, every day at least, to hear a little song, read a good poem, see a fine picture, and, if it were possible, to speak a few reasonable words." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You weren't looking for a manual back some time ago within the past year for
a Canadian Radio? I was going to hook you up if it was you. Oh well. Wrong scan man I guess! Sorry! L. "ScanMan" wrote in message ... Newp wrong ScanMan guy. I don't look for anything on Usenet, stick mostly to buying new or ebay, that's about it. Nothing I need at the moment, but thanks anyway! "L." wrote in message .net... Hey scan man... contact me direct... Got a ? for ya... remove the No Spam to reply. I THINK you're the same one I'm looking for. We'll soon find out. Someone named Scan man was looking for something a while back... I have that item. E-mail me. L. "ScanMan" wrote in message ... No, no, no - sorry, let me clarify - talking scanner vhf/uhf trunk tracking here. Didn't mean to confuse - sorry bout that! Most vhf/uhf hams I know are into trunk-tracking scanners as well. "Donald K" wrote in message ... Um, Can you define what you mean by "trunking?" Do you mean listening to monitoring systems that are trunked, or do you mean using trunked ham radio systems? (I which case I've got a WHOLE BUNCH more questions to ask...) I am unaware of any hams using trunking for ham systems. Thus there is little drive to include trunking features into ham HTs. -D ScanMan wrote: Funny, most hams I know are into trunking big time. But, most hams I know are only into vhf/uhf comms as well. I suppose your observation would be the fact for most gen/extra class hams who operate mostly on HF. Haven't heard too many of them discuss trunking on their nets or elsewhere. Good point there. "Donald K" wrote in message ... ScanMan wrote: As soon as they come out with a trunk-tracking extended receive quad band amateur transceiver I am SOLD heh Don't hold your breath. Trunking is an anathema to most hams. -- "One ought, every day at least, to hear a little song, read a good poem, see a fine picture, and, if it were possible, to speak a few reasonable words." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|