Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you sir! I went to their website and looked at the specs., I noticed
it doesn't do PL/DPL or if it does, it's not listed. I doesn't do WFM, and it doesn't do LTR. So maybe I'll take my chances with the 296D. If there's a problem I'll send it back........... Thanks to all................ "Bill Crocker" wrote in message ... Yes, the PRO-96 does 9600. Bill Crocker "CommCtr1" wrote in message ... Thanks for all the info. Although I've found Uniden service to be fairly good. I sent one of my 780's back a month ago and the turn around time was great and unit works better than when I first bought it. So does the Pro-96 do 9600bps? Thats the most important question at the moment. "Bill Crocker" wrote in message ... I've owned both, and I definately prefer GRE's PRO-96! God help you, should you ever have problems with a Uniden, and go to them for any kind of service! Uniden... Service? We don't give no stink'in service! Bill Crocker "CommCtr1" wrote in message ... I'm in the market for a digital scanner and I'm very loyal to Uniden/Bearcat for a lot of reasons. I need one that does 9600bps for our local system, but I'm told the Bearcats need some kind of tuning for them to operate properly on the APCO25 systems. Can someone fill me in on this? I'm not a big fan of Radio Shack scanners, I've had a few and they don't impress me at all. My last one was a Pro-91, what a piece of garbage. Rx was horrible, programming was a different story. They make the programming so complex, for something very simple. I've recently been told the Pro-96 is a better scanner than the 296D, so is this just a personal opinion, or is it actually true. Any information would be appreciated. thnx |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It definitely does; Continuous Tone Controlled Selective Squelch (CTCSS) and
Digital Coded Squelch (DCS) decoding. LTR, apparently it does not do, but then do you need it? Bill Crocker "CommCtr1" wrote in message ... Thank you sir! I went to their website and looked at the specs., I noticed it doesn't do PL/DPL or if it does, it's not listed. I doesn't do WFM, and it doesn't do LTR. So maybe I'll take my chances with the 296D. If there's a problem I'll send it back........... Thanks to all................ "Bill Crocker" wrote in message ... Yes, the PRO-96 does 9600. Bill Crocker "CommCtr1" wrote in message ... Thanks for all the info. Although I've found Uniden service to be fairly good. I sent one of my 780's back a month ago and the turn around time was great and unit works better than when I first bought it. So does the Pro-96 do 9600bps? Thats the most important question at the moment. "Bill Crocker" wrote in message ... I've owned both, and I definately prefer GRE's PRO-96! God help you, should you ever have problems with a Uniden, and go to them for any kind of service! Uniden... Service? We don't give no stink'in service! Bill Crocker "CommCtr1" wrote in message ... I'm in the market for a digital scanner and I'm very loyal to Uniden/Bearcat for a lot of reasons. I need one that does 9600bps for our local system, but I'm told the Bearcats need some kind of tuning for them to operate properly on the APCO25 systems. Can someone fill me in on this? I'm not a big fan of Radio Shack scanners, I've had a few and they don't impress me at all. My last one was a Pro-91, what a piece of garbage. Rx was horrible, programming was a different story. They make the programming so complex, for something very simple. I've recently been told the Pro-96 is a better scanner than the 296D, so is this just a personal opinion, or is it actually true. Any information would be appreciated. thnx |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am a Uniden fan also. The 780XLT was the last Uniden I have purchased
since that was a classic radio. When it comes to DIGITAL, I switched to the GRE PRO-96 as IMHO they make a much more user friendly digital scanner. You can generally buy one for around $399 or so at Radio Shack if you watch the sales and use other tricks for buying one. I carry the PRO-96 everywhere! If you want a base unit look for the new one they will start sellling in January 2005. ki4je |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have always been a PRO-43 fan but when LAPD went digital I gave up
scanning. A friend who is commercial radio repair guy and general Motorola freak always carries a Motorola ASTRO Saber to listen to LAPD and other specific high dollar handhelds for each service he listens to. Nothing like having the same radio as your local PD for a scanner. When the PRO-96 came out our sick puppy bought one and shortly after sold all his expensive ASTRO and other P-25 handhelds. He claims the PRO-96 works the same and sounds almost as good as the Motorola’s and also uses the same ?? chip for demodulating or decoding the P-25 digital. He also tried the Uniden equivalent and rejected it completely because of the crappy audio in digital mode. I just picked up a PRO-96 and am completely thrilled with it. The only thing I miss is the 225 to 400MHz mil band but I still have a PRO-43 that will cover that. If you want to listen to P-25 digital, I can’t imagine being unhappy with a PRO-96. CommCtr1 wrote: I'm in the market for a digital scanner and I'm very loyal to Uniden/Bearcat for a lot of reasons. I need one that does 9600bps for our local system, but I'm told the Bearcats need some kind of tuning for them to operate properly on the APCO25 systems. Can someone fill me in on this? I'm not a big fan of Radio Shack scanners, I've had a few and they don't impress me at all. My last one was a Pro-91, what a piece of garbage. Rx was horrible, programming was a different story. They make the programming so complex, for something very simple. I've recently been told the Pro-96 is a better scanner than the 296D, so is this just a personal opinion, or is it actually true. Any information would be appreciated. thnx |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike wrote:
The only thing I miss is the 225 to 400MHz mil band but I still have a PRO-43 that will cover that. I was under the impression that you can use an undocumented PRO-96 "feature" to open up the 225-400 band. I've also heard that the WIN96 program both knows how to do this and has a setting to enable it. (I haven't yet used WIN96 to load frequencies in that band, otherwise I'd know for certain.) Personally I would not want to program a PRO-96 without using WIN96 (or for that matter, any scanner without using a similarly good program). - Dan |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Uniden BC296D Scanner and Antennas | Scanner | |||
BC296D vs Pro 96 | Scanner | |||
FA: FA: Brand new Uniden BC296D and BC795D | Scanner | |||
Are there better handheld scanners than the Uniden BC296D | Scanner | |||
ID Tracker Update - V2.8.0 - BC296D and BC796D Support | Scanner |