Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 23rd 04, 08:02 AM
Mike
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have always been a PRO-43 fan but when LAPD went digital I gave up
scanning. A friend who is commercial radio repair guy and general
Motorola freak always carries a Motorola ASTRO Saber to listen to LAPD
and other specific high dollar handhelds for each service he listens
to. Nothing like having the same radio as your local PD for a scanner.
When the PRO-96 came out our sick puppy bought one and shortly after
sold all his expensive ASTRO and other P-25 handhelds. He claims the
PRO-96 works the same and sounds almost as good as the Motorola’s and
also uses the same ?? chip for demodulating or decoding the P-25
digital. He also tried the Uniden equivalent and rejected it completely
because of the crappy audio in digital mode. I just picked up a PRO-96
and am completely thrilled with it. The only thing I miss is the 225 to
400MHz mil band but I still have a PRO-43 that will cover that. If you
want to listen to P-25 digital, I can’t imagine being unhappy with a PRO-96.

CommCtr1 wrote:

I'm in the market for a digital scanner and I'm very loyal to Uniden/Bearcat
for a lot of reasons. I need one that does 9600bps for our local system, but
I'm told the Bearcats need some kind of tuning for them to operate properly
on the APCO25 systems. Can someone fill me in on this?
I'm not a big fan of Radio Shack scanners, I've had a few and they
don't impress me at all. My last one was a Pro-91, what a piece of garbage.
Rx was horrible, programming was a different story. They make the
programming so complex, for something very simple.
I've recently been told the Pro-96 is a better scanner than the 296D, so is
this just a personal opinion, or is it actually true.
Any information would be appreciated.

thnx




  #2   Report Post  
Old November 23rd 04, 10:41 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Mike wrote:

The only thing I miss is the 225 to 400MHz mil band but I still have
a PRO-43 that will cover that.


I was under the impression that you can use an undocumented PRO-96 "feature"
to open up the 225-400 band. I've also heard that the WIN96 program both
knows how to do this and has a setting to enable it. (I haven't yet used
WIN96 to load frequencies in that band, otherwise I'd know for certain.)

Personally I would not want to program a PRO-96 without using WIN96
(or for that matter, any scanner without using a similarly good program).

- Dan
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Uniden BC296D Scanner and Antennas Doug Matulis Scanner 2 September 24th 04 10:34 PM
BC296D vs Pro 96 Steven Lasher Scanner 1 March 14th 04 12:18 PM
FA: FA: Brand new Uniden BC296D and BC795D Radioman Scanner 0 February 28th 04 10:06 PM
Are there better handheld scanners than the Uniden BC296D hnmm Scanner 1 January 7th 04 03:36 PM
ID Tracker Update - V2.8.0 - BC296D and BC796D Support David M. Hitchner Scanner 0 December 20th 03 12:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017