Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My 1st time posting to a newsgroup but I would like to throw my 2 cents in
here. I do not, nor am I acquainted with anyone that works for Radio Shack. I am a novice as well, with the same testing equipment (my ears and what my scanner can receive). I received a PRO97 as a gift in November and I'm now hooked, I enjoy scanning more than I thought I ever would, even with the learning curve required for the trunking AND all of the mis-information available to newbie's. That said, I agree with alexx1400 100%. I have used 2 other non stock antennas, one being the Radio Shack antenna discussed here on my PRO97 and on a PRO92 that belongs to a friend. The 800MHz RS antenna improved the reception a great deal on both scanners in the same frequency range that alexx states, and in the case of these 2 scanners, the "150 range" reception also improved, so much so my friend also purchased the identical antenna, however, neither radio has any reception in the lowest range which neither one of us cares about. Maybe the area I live in (Hudson Valley, NY) has something to do with the improvement with the antenna, I don't have any technical spec's one way or the other, but I must say that neither radio has any signal without the antenna, nada. At this point both of us are satisfied with the gain in signal strength and clarity that the RS-800MHz antenna provided over the stock unit and feel the $ was well spent. Could it be the area that you use your PRO95 in has anything to do with having such a great signal? "NeonHomer" wrote in message ... I have one of those 800MHz antennas on my Pro95 as well.. I get the same signal w/ the antenna, or w/o it... or w/o any antenna whatsoever!! I found the pro95 works better when you leave the first channel (channel 0) blank on a bank that is trunked... for some reason it works a whole lot better.. for me anyway... This is with an EDACS system, not a Motorola... I haven't tried it w/ moto yet. On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:04:16 GMT, "Alex Clayton" wrote: First let me start with, I know nothing about radio, and antenna's other than what I experience. When I mentioned a while back I had found I could shorten my antenna on a Pro-95 and still get the 800 trunked police calls the same I got a bunch of e-mails from people who are MUCH more educated than me, telling me all the reasons it would not work and do not try it. I already had done it, with an extra antenna and it works just as well as the antennas that came with the Pro-79 and Pro-95. Now it did hinder the county police calls here that come out on the 150's band, but I seldom listen to them and did not care. Also this involves Radio shack. I know a lot of you have an ax to grind with them, again I don't care so don't bother e-mailing me to tell me they are the worst place on the planet to buy anything from. So all that out of the way G: Since the city here started switching over to 800 trunked I learned to program the Pro-95 I had bought a couple years ago. I found the reception on the 800 band works better than the old 400 band, which the police are still using while they up date all their radios, in areas that were hard to receive before. Such as inside buildings where I work for example. It used to be hard to pick up calls inside the buildings if the scanner was worn on my belt, with the 800 it seems to make no difference, inside, outside, on my belt or on my shoulder which was nice. When the weather was bad reception did get a lot of static on the 800, but you could still hear them. Anyway I noticed RS offered an antenna that was supposed to work better on the 800 trunked. I finally decided to give it a try, figured if it did nothing I would just take it back. Well after trying it, it does work better, than the original antennas, at least to my un educated ears. They "claim" it works twice as well, now to my again un trained ears that's a stretch, but it does work better. The new one does also work just as well on the 400 and 150's band, even though they warned me at the store that it would not. I did not care, but since the police here are transmitting on both right now it's easy to check. So anyway for anyone who is an novice like me, if you are listening to the 800 and having trouble it may be worth trying one of these. You can order them off the RS site, I just went to the local store and bought one. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"rich g." wrote in message
news:AGsEf.90903$M94.78567@trnddc01... My 1st time posting to a newsgroup but I would like to throw my 2 cents in here. I do not, nor am I acquainted with anyone that works for Radio Shack. I am a novice as well, with the same testing equipment (my ears and what my scanner can receive). I received a PRO97 as a gift in November and I'm now hooked, I enjoy scanning more than I thought I ever would, even with the learning curve required for the trunking AND all of the mis-information available to newbie's. That said, I agree with alexx1400 100%. I have used 2 other non stock antennas, one being the Radio Shack antenna discussed here on my PRO97 and on a PRO92 that belongs to a friend. The 800MHz RS antenna improved the reception a great deal on both scanners in the same frequency range that alexx states, and in the case of these 2 scanners, the "150 range" reception also improved, so much so my friend also purchased the identical antenna, however, neither radio has any reception in the lowest range which neither one of us cares about. Maybe the area I live in (Hudson Valley, NY) has something to do with the improvement with the antenna, I don't have any technical spec's one way or the other, but I must say that neither radio has any signal without the antenna, nada. At this point both of us are satisfied with the gain in signal strength and clarity that the RS-800MHz antenna provided over the stock unit and feel the $ was well spent. Could it be the area that you use your PRO95 in has anything to do with having such a great signal? Glad it worked for someone else. I too am not even close to being any kind of expert at this. A friend of mine bought a 246 on my recommendation and I set it up for him. When I was doing it I had my 246 and my Pro-95 going. I tried the no antenna and on the Mot. 800 all 3 would receive some, with no antenna, but it was very spotty. One the 150's where the County Police are, there was Nada on all 3. The guy bought a RS antenna on my recommendation so we could try 2 of the same scanners side by side. The 246 with the RS antenna was noticeably better on the 800 with the RS antenna. On the County channels I could tell no difference even though RS had also warned him when he bought his 800 antenna that it would NOT work with them. I "guess" the sales people at RS must be told to say this as they must have gotten some returned for this reason? Don't know as the people I have talked to there seemed to know a hell of a lot less than me about scanners which is pretty damn bad for someone selling them. The great thing about RS is if you buy one in the store, and you can't tell it works any better they will take it back, so you have nothing to loose trying it. -- "Everything in excess! To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites. Moderation is for monks." [Lazarus Long] |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] | Shortwave | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna |