Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've recently bought a PRO-95 and am enjoying scanning.....
Several times now, while listening to our local police/sheriff channel, I'll run receive an unintelligible message. The voices are very high pitched, sounding like a cross between Minnie Mouse and Alvin the Chipmunk, and I know they're talking but I can't quite understand what they are saying. Superimposed over this is a loud ticking sound. What have I run into?? Wayne Port Townsend, WA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Howell wrote:
I've recently bought a PRO-95 and am enjoying scanning..... Several times now, while listening to our local police/sheriff channel, I'll run receive an unintelligible message. The voices are very high pitched, sounding like a cross between Minnie Mouse and Alvin the Chipmunk, and I know they're talking but I can't quite understand what they are saying. Superimposed over this is a loud ticking sound. What have I run into?? Rolling code voice inversion, the "tick" is the sync telegram. Should be near to impossible to decode this, sorry. Transcrypt is a common manufaturer of such toys, also AFAIK Daxon. Wayne Port Townsend, WA regards - Ralph -- Want to get in touch? http://www.radio-link.net/whereisralph.txt |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it's voice inversion, even if the base freq shifts about, should be
pretty straight forward to decode. Any .wav (or whatever format) samples on the net available to download and examine? B. Ralph A. Schmid, DK5RAS wrote: Wayne Howell wrote: I've recently bought a PRO-95 and am enjoying scanning..... Several times now, while listening to our local police/sheriff channel, I'll run receive an unintelligible message. The voices are very high pitched, sounding like a cross between Minnie Mouse and Alvin the Chipmunk, and I know they're talking but I can't quite understand what they are saying. Superimposed over this is a loud ticking sound. What have I run into?? Rolling code voice inversion, the "tick" is the sync telegram. Should be near to impossible to decode this, sorry. Transcrypt is a common manufaturer of such toys, also AFAIK Daxon. Wayne Port Townsend, WA regards - Ralph |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bob wrote:
If it's voice inversion, even if the base freq shifts about, should be pretty straight forward to decode. Any .wav (or whatever format) samples on the net available to download and examine? How do you want to find out what inversion frequency is used at what moment? regards - Ralph -- Want to get in touch? http://www.radio-link.net/whereisralph.txt |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
First you have to determine ow many 'base' frequencies are utilized.
it's likely a small number, likely 8, 16 at the most. If it's a variable scale, it could be a larger number, but again, not an impossible task. You will have to determine how the key is sent, or if it's a rolling sequence. (a rolling sequence would not require continuous sync pulses, so it's likely the receiver looks for the next key (base freq) and changes the mix frequency accordingly. To analyze it manually (to at least get some details about the transmission format) just grab a small (perhaps a few seconds) sample and tear it apart manually. Break it up with a computer sound editing program and play each slice repeatedly into a frequency inversion circuit (Ramsay sold one, there are also a few schematics floating about the net) until you recover natural sounding snippits of audio. Splice it all back together and see how it sounds. Document each mixer freq needed, and compare them to each 'tick' data byte. (you'll need a data slicer for this, again, see the net.) This will give you a good selection of raw data. Just to clairfy things, when I said "...it should be pretty straightfroward to decode." I was not suggesting it would not be labour intense. It could turn out to be a royal pain in the a$$, however, if it's simply inversion with a variable mixer freq, there's no real security there. It would be inconvienent to analyze, but again, the process is straightforward. To automate it will also take a lot of time, but again, unlike with digital ciphering, you're not up against large numbers and even larger permutations. Is there a sample of the audio somewhere on the net that could be downloaded? B. Ralph A. Schmid, DK5RAS wrote: bob wrote: If it's voice inversion, even if the base freq shifts about, should be pretty straight forward to decode. Any .wav (or whatever format) samples on the net available to download and examine? How do you want to find out what inversion frequency is used at what moment? regards - Ralph |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bob wrote:
roward to decode." I was not suggesting it would not be labour intense. It could turn out to be a royal pain in the a$$, however, if it's simply inversion with a variable mixer freq, there's no real security there. The problem may be that the tick usually has nothing to do with the number of frequency changes. The inversion frequency may change several hundred times per minute, and the tick is just used to keep in sync. regards - Ralph -- Want to get in touch? http://www.radio-link.net/whereisralph.txt |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Voice scrambling of the audio.
"Wayne Howell" wrote in message ... I've recently bought a PRO-95 and am enjoying scanning..... Several times now, while listening to our local police/sheriff channel, I'll run receive an unintelligible message. The voices are very high pitched, sounding like a cross between Minnie Mouse and Alvin the Chipmunk, and I know they're talking but I can't quite understand what they are saying. Superimposed over this is a loud ticking sound. What have I run into?? Wayne Port Townsend, WA |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|