Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christopher O'Callaghan wrote:
MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES Sorry......he was found Not Guilty---not Innocent. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is a BIG difference.
"Wayne Howell" wrote in message ... Christopher O'Callaghan wrote: MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES Sorry......he was found Not Guilty---not Innocent. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Hackett" , feigning moral
superiority, sputtered incoherently in news:Vinre.3472$eM6.2480 @newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net: Morons -- You are a fluke of the Universe You have no right to be here And whether you can hear it or not, the Universe is laughing behind your back "Five-eleven's your height, one-ninety your weight You cash in your chips around page ninety-eight." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christopher O'Callaghan said
MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES Perhaps now they will go after the numbnut parents who allow their kids to do 'sleep-overs' with MJ. ;-) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OH NO WACKO JACKO ON THE LOSE!
AS THEY SAY! MONEY TALKS BULL**** WALKS I THINK THE GUY ****EN MORON! AND SHOULD GONE TO JAIL! AND BTW. HIS SONG SUXS ****! Christopher O'Callaghan wrote: MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES -- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The kids parents should have put a finger in one of the diet cokes and
gone for some "pain and suffering". K On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:45:02 +0100, "Christopher O'Callaghan" wrote: MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() keith wrote: The kids parents should have put a finger in one of the diet cokes and gone for some "pain and suffering". K On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:45:02 +0100, "Christopher O'Callaghan" wrote: MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES MICHEAL JACKSON CAN GO TO HELL ALL I CARE! INNOCENT MY ASS! ITS FUNNY HOW MANY IDIOTS SHOWED UP & STANDING THEIR! OH PLEASE! AM SURE BUBBA WOULD GIVE HIM GOOD WORK OUT! HE'LL BE SING BANG ME! BANG ME! -- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:57:09 GMT, "Jim Hackett"
wrote: That is a BIG difference. "Wayne Howell" wrote in message ... Christopher O'Callaghan wrote: MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES Sorry......he was found Not Guilty---not Innocent. Insofar as you are presumed to be innocent until proven guilty, then being found not guilty equates to being found innocent. Your view notwithstanding. If you were to publicly proclaim him guilty (without clearly expressing that it was the _opinion_ of yourself or others) in view of the court's determination, you could well be successfully sued for slander. That's why the news media carefully use the term "allegedly" in reference to presumed criminals all the way up to the moment of conviction. They wish to avoid prosecution, generally in the case of media, for libel. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Of course Michael Jackson is innocent, what a stupid question: | Policy | |||
Leland Scott Is Innocent | CB | |||
Illegal CBers harass innocent people | CB | |||
Is Michael Jackson Innocent? Is KE4TEW a father of felons? YES | Swap |