N9OGL wrote:
And you can eat **** and die!!!!



You really do need to make an attempt to grow up toddieboy.

this isn't your ****ing newsgroup

And where did I ever say it was?

On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 22:33:20 -0700, Cmdr Buzz Corey said
in rec.radio.scanner:

N9OGL wrote:
And you can eat **** and die!!!!

You really do need to make an attempt to grow up toddieboy.

Or at least to expand his vocabulary a little.

From: "N9OGL"
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Newsgroups:
rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,re c.radio.scanner,rec.radio.sh
ortwave
Date: 25 Sep 2005 21:06:40 -0700
Subject: FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME

And you can eat **** and die!!!!

this isn't your ****ing newsgroup

Your grammar is improving.

Greg

"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...
**** YOU! I have debate a number of things on various newsgroups it's
assholes like cornwhore and all your little bitchs on here a agitate
and harass so again **** you!


I'm sorry...but I just can't resist here.....Toad claims to have been born
in 1968 was it? And now he claims to be going to college, and don't seem to
have a problem with living with his parents....Let's see now....that makes
him....37....THIRTY SEVEN YEARS OLD.

Uh......at that age....

1. Why are you still in college?

2. Why do you still live with your parents

3. Just exactly what are you learning in community college Toad?

Just curious.

And please stop the juvenile pre-high school silliness and language, if you
can.

Dan/W4NTI

"N9OGL" wrote in message
ups.com...
...the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.

doesn't matter Interference is interference, and ANYONE or GROUP who
causes interference should pay regardless if it for the "common good".
As for published schedule the FCC has stated that do mean squat, my
view is that all who cause interference should pay.

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW
14.321.00


I have decided to start a new net....I pick 14.321. I will be replaying
ARRL bulletins and information from RAIN. Then claim it as original. I
will also be using a prompt from Walter Cronkike, even tho his lawyers
asked me to stop.

Then if anyone interferes with me I will send out "Felony affidavits".

What you think Toad? Looks like your future to me.

Dan/W4NTI

Yes, Todd's college education is starting to pay off !!!

"Greg" wrote in message
...


From: "N9OGL"
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Newsgroups:
rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,re c.radio.scanner,rec.radio.sh
ortwave
Date: 25 Sep 2005 21:06:40 -0700
Subject: FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME

And you can eat **** and die!!!!

this isn't your ****ing newsgroup

Your grammar is improving.

Greg

On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:24:38 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:16:00 GMT, "AMEN" said in
rec.radio.scanner:

Well, you have a point. But I still like his hacksaw idea.

A straight pin through the coax is more subtle - and a lot more
difficult to diagnose.

Har. I have no idea what either of those did, but the second
reminds me of my first job. Our direct boss was as much of a nervous
narvus as I've ever seen. The office, in the early 60s, was wired with
an arrangement whereby his boss could call any one of my boss' four
peers into his office using a buzzer to each of their desks.

We found we could poke a pin into the right cable against the
wall and frequently set his buzzer off. Then he'd go into his boss'
office and get chewed out for being an idiot for showing up when he
hadn't been called.

We also found out that if you leaned back hard enough in one
of the office chairs, it made nearly the same sound.

I suspect the guy could have lived a few extra years if he
didn't have the four of us as his temporary summer messengers a couple
of years running.

On 23 Sep 2005 17:29:11 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote:

...the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.

doesn't matter Interference is interference, and ANYONE or GROUP who
causes interference should pay regardless if it for the "common good".
As for published schedule the FCC has stated that do mean squat, my
view is that all who cause interference should pay.


Including the interference your splatter is causing on this
group?

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW
14.321.00

Do you have a count of the people you've convinced not to top
post?


On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:03:34 +1000, Barry OGrady
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:11:13 GMT, "Wayne P. Muckleroy" wrote:

It's never a good idea to use vigilante tactics to solve a problem. There
are rules for which all of us must abide.

One of those rules is that we must never top post.

One of those rules is that we must
not intentionally block or interfere with another transmission that is in
progress. We must all share the frequencies in an orderly fashion.

These are the rules. If we were to all ignore these rules and transmit
whenever, however, and wherever we pleased, there would be mass chaos on
most bands. The rules are structured and enforced by the FCC. I cannot
condone any other approach to eliminating unruly examples like K1MAN--as
frustrating as that approach may be.

A: Top posting
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?



Wayne P. Muckleroy
(KC8UIO)

"AMEN" wrote in message
news:j5iYe.357189$_o.126093@attbi_s71...

"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...
It is FAR from over, after the FCC makes it's decision it goes to Court
of Appeal where he can challenge the FCC rules and or decision. If he
transmits, he will be unlicensed which can speed the process to the
court systems like I said it's FAR from over.

Todd N9OGL
The N9OGL Show
14.321.00 Mhz


Wayne Green had by far the best solution to the problem back in 1992:


Wayne Green W2NSD/1
WGI Center
Peterborough NH 03458

Sep. 13, 1992

"While I can appreciate your frustration with Baxter, which I share, your
approach to disenfranchising him seems to indicate that you either do not
read my editorials or at least don't remember them. I've God knows how
many
times been quite blunt about NOT annoying the FCC with our problems.
That's
not only a waste of time, it's downright dangerous... and can cause far
more
trouble than poor little Baxter. Please remember that we keep trying to
convince the FCC that we are self-regulating. Note the term "self."

If a few hams ever want to get rid of Baxter that's not all that
difficult... and you don't even have to pay a hit man to clean off 14,275.
All it takes is a little creativity and some coordinated effort.

As a matter of fact it would be fun to wipe out Baxter. And you wouldn't
even have to have a small group of like-minded hams drive to Maine with
hack
saws for his coax and tower or a concentrated campaign to turn his
neighbors
against him with propaganda. No, all it would take is a few hams with good
signals and some coordination.

I'm sure you can come up with much more fitting tortures for Baxter than
anything I could dream up, but my mind turns to getting the channel about
ten minutes before his broadcasts with my own anti-IARN broadcasts. I'll
bet
I could come up with some material which would burn Baxter, yet would not
quite be actionable. Or I might tape one of his broadcasts and just repeat
it as a "service" right on top of him and wipe him out. I've got as good a
signal as anyone and I'm only a couple hundred miles from him. Knowing the
love they have for him in Maine I'm sure you can find one, two or even
three
strong stations fairly near him to join in the effort to "help" him get
his
broadcasts out.

Of course if you don't know anyone capable of outsmarting Baxter, then you
have no choice but to give up and take up stamp collecting. Baxter may be
loud, but I haven't yet seen any signs of a three digit IQ behind the mess
he's been making for several years.

If you do decide to actually do something instead of wasting your time on
the FCC and ARRL, please let me know. "

Cheers ...
Wayne





Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og

On 23 Sep 2005 00:48:10 -0700, "an_old_friend"
wrote:

grow up

Barry OGrady wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:11:13 GMT, "Wayne P. Muckleroy" wrote:

It's never a good idea to use vigilante tactics to solve a problem. There
are rules for which all of us must abide.

One of those rules is that we must never top post.

no such rule

there may be a convention, but no rule

One of those rules is that we must
not intentionally block or interfere with another transmission that is in
progress. We must all share the frequencies in an orderly fashion.

These are the rules. If we were to all ignore these rules and transmit
whenever, however, and wherever we pleased, there would be mass chaos on
most bands. The rules are structured and enforced by the FCC. I cannot
condone any other approach to eliminating unruly examples like K1MAN--as
frustrating as that approach may be.

A: Top posting
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?

not even even close


Actually the bozo who's recently resorted to profane,
capitalized shrieking is far more annoying.



Wayne P. Muckleroy
(KC8UIO)

"AMEN" wrote in message
news:j5iYe.357189$_o.126093@attbi_s71...
cut