Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
I would like to improve my airband reception for my local airfield (Sywell). Currently I can hardly make out what the tower is saying and struggle with 75% of aircraft as the voice signal levels dissappear into the noise levels. Most signals do activate the squelch ok, but the audio noise levels are just to high. My current setup consist of a dual band (2m & 70cm) vertical fiber glass antenna (I can't find the exact details at the mo) on a 2.5m meter pole which takes the top of the aerial just above level with the neighbouring houses roofs. It then feeds into the loft with about 3 M of Y[1] cable, through a small lightening discharge unit (which I still need to put the ground connection in for) and then through 3m meters more of Y[1] cable. Then inside the loft room it goes into a panel mount BNC connector and through 1M of RG-59/U cable before going into the AOR AR900 scanner. [1] It has no numbers written on it, but it is a 1cm diameter coax cable original bought for amateur radio use. I suspect the loft room is fairly RF noisy as it is my study including two computers, monitors, ADSL, wireless 802.11b etc. Connecting the scanner to mains (via it's transformer, or battery makes no difference. I'm looking for a rough idea of how much the following options would improve my reception experience against the cost / difficulty of completing those changes: 1) Change aerial (must also be able to Rx & Tx on 2m and 70cm) 2) Raise aerial by 1m or so, so that it is above neighbours roofs. 3) Change aerial feed cable 4) Ground the lightening arrestor (something I know I need to do anyway) 5) Change Rx end BNC to BNC cable (is that the right kind of cable? Impedance mismatch?) 6) Change panel mount BNC connector (does this let noise in due to short unshielded bit of inner cable or impedance mismatch?) 7) Add a band pass filter for airband at the Rx end 8) Add a pre-amp for airband as close to the aerial as possible Any other suggestions? Thanks in advance Kev |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Hi I would like to improve my airband reception for my local airfield (Sywell). Currently I can hardly make out what the tower is saying and struggle with 75% of aircraft as the voice signal levels dissappear into the noise levels. Most signals do activate the squelch ok, but the audio noise levels are just to high. My current setup consist of a dual band (2m & 70cm) vertical fiber glass antenna (I can't find the exact details at the mo) on a 2.5m meter pole which takes the top of the aerial just above level with the neighbouring houses roofs. It then feeds into the loft with about 3 M of Y[1] cable, through a small lightening discharge unit (which I still need to put the ground connection in for) and then through 3m meters more of Y[1] cable. Then inside the loft room it goes into a panel mount BNC connector and through 1M of RG-59/U cable before going into the AOR AR900 scanner. [1] It has no numbers written on it, but it is a 1cm diameter coax cable original bought for amateur radio use. I suspect the loft room is fairly RF noisy as it is my study including two computers, monitors, ADSL, wireless 802.11b etc. Connecting the scanner to mains (via it's transformer, or battery makes no difference. I'm looking for a rough idea of how much the following options would improve my reception experience against the cost / difficulty of completing those changes: 1) Change aerial (must also be able to Rx & Tx on 2m and 70cm) 2) Raise aerial by 1m or so, so that it is above neighbours roofs. 3) Change aerial feed cable 4) Ground the lightening arrestor (something I know I need to do anyway) 5) Change Rx end BNC to BNC cable (is that the right kind of cable? Impedance mismatch?) 6) Change panel mount BNC connector (does this let noise in due to short unshielded bit of inner cable or impedance mismatch?) 7) Add a band pass filter for airband at the Rx end 8) Add a pre-amp for airband as close to the aerial as possible Any other suggestions? Thanks in advance Kev Just out of curiosity, you say the aircraft on the ground are noisy and the tower too. Are aircraft in the circuit area ok and readable or are ALL affected? Silly question, but you are in AM Mode, aren't you? The antenna you have is not designed for this frequency range, but ought to work well enough as I am able to listen to aircraft on a similar arrangement. Further height will always help, especially as you want to hear ground signals. It will make little difference with airborne signals. If oyu are having trouble with ALL aircraft signals, then you really need to consider relocating that antenna. Consider turning off some of that equipment to isolate the possible noise source that may be drowning them out. If the signals are affected by local noise, a preamp will amplify that too. Putting an airband preamp on won't allow you to use it for 2m and 70cm. I don't understand the part about "short unshielded bit". None of the coax or bnc plugs should allow you to have any "short unshielded bits" and might be a starting point. Grounding the lightning arrestor should make no difference to reception, only offer protection in the event of a local discharge, and it won't do much in the event of a direct hit, so don't place too much faith in it. Brad. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Brad
Thanks for the quick response. Yes I am in AM mode ![]() ground are barely readable, the Tower is slightly better but still I can only make out 25% of what is said. In general flying aircraft are better, with 25% being very clear, but equally 25% being worse than the tower. I will try turning everything off up here tomorrow and see if it makes a difference reducing the electrical noise. The aerial is on the chimney, so about the best position I can get it other than on a longer pole on the chimney. Pre-amp wise I could get it just where the coax comes in through the roof tiles, and then I could take it out when I want to Tx. The 'short unshielded bits' - it is a Panel Mount BNC Socket, so the shield is twisted together and soldered to a lug on the outside, leaving about 1cm of center unshielded. Other option I thought off was to take a dedicated airband aerial, soemthing like this: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...tem=5773226141 and either place that high up in the loft space? Thanks again Kev |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... The 'short unshielded bits' - it is a Panel Mount BNC Socket, so the shield is twisted together and soldered to a lug on the outside, leaving about 1cm of center unshielded. That part won't matter. I was more concerned with poor terminations in the feedline. That antenna on ebay doesn't specify a length, but looks like a similar style to mine. That's certainly where the gain needs to be. If you really want to receive that airport, you could consider a short yagi, 3el perhaps. How far away is this airport? What terrain between your locations? Brad. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
'BNC Cable' = 1M of RG-59/U The BNC Panel connector is still a panel connector, ie an open backed soldered connector that does leave a short bit of unshielded core. The airport is Sywell, about 5 miles away from me, a small local grass airfield. I'm looking to hear this airfield well as I want to do my PPL from there at some point soon. I will try and get a better idea of the terain between Sywell and myself at the top of Wellingborough later, but there certanily isnt a mountain between us ![]() I'm thinking that a short Yagi might be the best bet for my situation, as from what you guys are saying there is nothing terrible in my current setup at the moment, and aircraft close to Sywell and the Tower at Sywell is what I really want to improve if I had to pick a more specific target to improve. Comments & sugestions welcome. Cheers Kev |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looking around at Yagi's the largest selection is obviously for the
amateur bands. How much gain will I loose on airband from a 2M (144Mhz ish) Yagi? Somehting like this maybe: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...tem=5821390009 Cheers Kev |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Looking around at Yagi's the largest selection is obviously for the amateur bands. How much gain will I loose on airband from a 2M (144Mhz ish) Yagi? Somehting like this maybe: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...tem=5821390009 Cheers Kev |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Looking around at Yagi's the largest selection is obviously for the amateur bands. How much gain will I loose on airband from a 2M (144Mhz ish) Yagi? Somehting like this maybe: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...tem=5821390009 Cheers Kev The loss will be considerable. Yagis are quite narrow band. For a few bucks/pounds/euros you can buy some aluminium tubing from a hardware store and build your own. If the countryside around you is reasonably flat, it makes sense that you are having trouble hearing GA aircaft. The top mounted antennas are barely 5ft off the ground, the belly antennas merely 18" off the ground. That's not a lot of antenna height. Most GA aircraft coms run less than 10W. Brad. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Little Used Tactic in U.S. for Greatly Improving Reception | Shortwave | |||
Improving AM Broadcast Band reception | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
improving WWVB reception | Broadcasting |