Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm thinking of getting a new handheld scanner, mainly for listening to
shortwave stations, the amateur radio bands, CB and airband. The above two receivers seem appropriate (and about the same prince in the UK - £140). I don't really understand the specs as to which is most sensitive. Anything else I should be looking for? Any other suggestions for other makes appreciated. Thanks Pete |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete Boyd wrote:
I'm thinking of getting a new handheld scanner, mainly for listening to shortwave stations, the amateur radio bands, CB and airband. The above two receivers seem appropriate (and about the same prince in the UK - £140). I don't really understand the specs as to which is most sensitive. Anything else I should be looking for? Any other suggestions for other makes appreciated. For shortwave, amateur HF and CB, handheld scanners are sub-optimal performers. There are some nicely capable portable units, although not in the walkie-talkie form factor, such as the Sangean 909, which are *much* better performers in those bands. -- St. John One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say. -Will Durant |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "St. John Smythe" wrote in message ... Pete Boyd wrote: I'm thinking of getting a new handheld scanner, mainly for listening to shortwave stations, the amateur radio bands, CB and airband. The above two receivers seem appropriate (and about the same prince in the UK - £140). I don't really understand the specs as to which is most sensitive. Anything else I should be looking for? Any other suggestions for other makes appreciated. For shortwave, amateur HF and CB, handheld scanners are sub-optimal performers. There are some nicely capable portable units, although not in the walkie-talkie form factor, such as the Sangean 909, which are *much* better performers in those bands. THanks for your msg. How are they when connected to a different antenna eg when I'm at home? Pete |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete Boyd wrote:
How are they when connected to a different antenna eg when I'm at home? Which "they?" -- St. John |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "St. John Smythe" wrote in message For shortwave, amateur HF and CB, handheld scanners are sub-optimal performers. There are some nicely capable portable units, although not in the walkie-talkie form factor, such as the Sangean 909, which are *much* better performers in those bands. I certainly agree ! H.J. ( proud owner of a DX-398 ) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "St. John Smythe" wrote in message ... Pete Boyd wrote: How are they when connected to a different antenna eg when I'm at home? Which "they?" The Icom or Yaesu. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete Boyd wrote:
"St. John Smythe" wrote in message Which "they?" The Icom or Yaesu. Starting with the understanding that radio receivers represent compromises between sensitivity, and selectivity and front end overloading, the problem with the little receivers is that by the time you get enough antenna on them to provide good signals, you may also have overloaded them with either in-band or out-of-band signals. As someone who appreciates compact things, it pains me to say this, but scanners are best at scanning, and shortwave receivers are best at shortwave. I use a BC246T for portable scanning, and a Sangean ATS-909 for portable shortwave. I would have much preferred to have a single unit that did it all, but as far as I know, such a thing (good enough filters, BFO at the right place in the passband, trunking) doesn't yet exist. -- St. John Flugg's Law: When you need to knock on wood is when you realize the world is composed of vinyl, naugahyde and aluminum. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete Boyd" wrote in message ... I'm thinking of getting a new handheld scanner, mainly for listening to shortwave stations, the amateur radio bands, CB and airband. The above two receivers seem appropriate (and about the same prince in the UK - £140). I don't really understand the specs as to which is most sensitive. Anything else I should be looking for? I don't think you'll be able to find a truly decent performer for all of the bands you want to hear in the size you want. These small receivers try to do everything at once, but unfortunately, they don't do it particularly well. Best to stick with a portable SW receiver for shortwave listening, and get a separate scanner for the higher bands. On a positive note, there are small portable SW receivers that work very well at a very reasonable price, and the same goes for scanners. Jackie |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Icom, Yaesu, Alinco Manuals | Swap | |||
ICOM YAESU SERVICE MANUALS | Swap | |||
FS: Icom, Yaesu Service Manuals etc. | Swap | |||
FS: Icom, Yaesu Service Manuals Etc... | Swap | |||
FS: Icom, Yaesu Service Manuals | Swap |