Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The time has come to replace my very old Regency/AOR scanner with
something a little more modern. Right now I'm just attempting to compile a list of current and recently discontinued scanners that meet my feature criteria: Need - CTCSS per channel decode. One tone per channel is OK Unit must NOT stop on a busy channel just because it's busy - VHF Low, High and UHF - Mobile / base form factor Would Like - Alphanumeric display - Programming AND control via PC DON'T Need/want - Handheld - Trunking It will be used in a high level RF environment (LOS to 8 commercial/public safety/ham towers) so I suspect that I'll have to add some external filtering but a receiver with some front-end selectivity to start with (electronically tuned filter) would be great. Suggestions? Bill |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 04:05:53 GMT, Bill Powell wrote:
Need - CTCSS per channel decode. One tone per channel is OK Unit must NOT stop on a busy channel just because it's busy - VHF Low, High and UHF - Mobile / base form factor Would Like - Alphanumeric display - Programming AND control via PC That limits you to Uniden. DON'T Need/want - Handheld - Trunking You're going to get it, though. It will be used in a high level RF environment (LOS to 8 commercial/public safety/ham towers) so I suspect that I'll have to add some external filtering Motorola G-strips for VHF-lo and VHF-hi. Maybe something like a U44BBT for UHF. You'd have to add a lot of circuitry to make them scanners, though. Scanners have barn doors for front ends. If you want to use a scanner get used to the fact that you're going to receive lots of intermod in that environment. You either get a good receiver or you get a scanner - no one makes a scanner with a G-strip front end, and no one ever will. but a receiver with some front-end selectivity to start with (electronically tuned filter) would be great. The kind of filter you'd need would cost more than a scanner. Sometimes, you *can't* get there from here. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just picked up the new Uniden BC898T this weekend it will do
everything you want except for Alphanumeric display. It uses standard 9pin serial cable to connect to the PC, it also has the new 6.5KHZ freq step that commercial radios will be using. I have a Cushman service monitor to check HT & mobile rigs but needed something to decode DCS & CTCSS tones & the 898 really does a good job, it will display which type of tone and tone frequency on even the weakest signals, it also does all 3 types of trunking and alot of other features and theres free softwae out there for it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Basic trunking scanner advice | Scanner | |||
FS: European Radio Shack PRO-2045 scanner with CTCSS Board $150 shipped to a US Address | Swap | |||
WANTED: Uniden Scanner BC002 CTCSS Tone Board | Equipment | |||
WANTED: Uniden Scanner BC002 CTCSS Tone Board | Equipment | |||
FS: scanner stuff | Scanner |