Dave wrote:
David G. Nagel wrote:
A ham operator intercepted the SOS from the RMS Titanic.

Yep!! It happened once!

If CW had not existed at the time, how would things have
turned out differently? If the present GPS-based system
had existed at the time, how would things have turned out?
Which system is presently inferior and virtually obsolete?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
TROLL-O-METER


Bill, W6WRT

There I fixed it for you

Uh oh! Now a battle of the troll-o-meters...
Really cute, Bill...I love it.

73, Steve, K9DCI
P.S. I tilted my monitor and I see that this movement is a little out of
balance on the sides. End-to-end balance is ok. Carefully turn the balance
weight on the right side in a little, then it'll sit on zero regardless of
the orientation...

"R. Scott" wrote in message
...
------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
TROLL-O-METER


Bill, W6WRT

There I fixed it for you

Cecil Moore wrote:

Dave wrote:

David G. Nagel wrote:

A ham operator intercepted the SOS from the RMS Titanic.


Yep!! It happened once!


If CW had not existed at the time, how would things have
turned out differently? If the present GPS-based system
had existed at the time, how would things have turned out?
Which system is presently inferior and virtually obsolete?

C'mon Cecil, you've been licensed as long as I have. I Know you Know CW. Does
that mean we're virtually obsolete?

RE Titanic:

The same result would have happened. The ship hit an iceberg in poor visibility.
I don't think icebergs carry GPS transponders these days.

Now, the Titanic's GPS; does it have transponder capability? The older GPS units
do not. Anyway, after the crew slipped by the iceberg that ripped it open, the
radio op gets on the air and reports "SOS" or equivalent. The nearest ships
respond. Under conditions similar to 1914{?} the Titanic still sinks. Many
people still die. But, now we know to 20 feet exactly where the ship was when it
sank.

GPS won't make a difference. Neither will CW today.

I still enjoy CW.

Dave wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:


C'mon Cecil, you've been licensed as long as I have. I Know you Know CW. Does
that mean we're virtually obsolete?
not what make CW obseltete is that is out dated and all bu useless
serious comms

GPS won't make a difference. Neither will CW today.
meaning in light of the trolig title is useless

I still enjoy CW.
more power to you

Dirk wrote:

Ham's care more about operating appliances than knowing how to save a lives.

:-(


PLONK!

tom
K0TAR

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:04:06 GMT, "R. Scott"
wrote:

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
TROLL-O-METER


Bill, W6WRT

There I fixed it for you


------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

I think you just unplugged your trolltenna.

Bill, W6WRT

R. Scott wrote:

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
TROLL-O-METER


Bill, W6WRT


There I fixed it for you



PLONK!

There, I fixed it for me.

tom
K0TAR

(Dirk) wrote in :

Ham's care more about operating appliances than knowing how to save a
lives.

The person would not die on my watch, as long as I could get a signal out
and someone on the other end could copy it. I'd probably have to practice
a bit to get back up over 50wpm, but I can do 25 or 30 all day long.


--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667

Dave wrote:
C'mon Cecil, you've been licensed as long as I have. I Know you Know CW.
Does that mean we're virtually obsolete?

My favorite mode is CW and it's a fun mode but it is never
going to save the world.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp