Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 16th 06, 07:16 PM posted to rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3
Default least crowded frequency band for wireless mic?

I want to buy a wireless mic set and it comes in one of three bands that I
have to choose at the time of purchase:

518 to 554 MHz
626 to 662 MHz
740 to 776 MHz

The goal is to pick the band with the least interference.

The manufacturer's web site has a table showing TV stations in my city
(seattle), and it look like it's clear in the 740 to 776 MHz range. So
should I buy the set in this range or is there more research to be done?
http://www.sennheiserusa.com/newsite...SHINGTONew.PDF

BTW, they said the table is created in 2002. Does anyone know where to find
an updated frequency usage table for a given city?

Sorry this is not directly related to scanners but I hope people in this NG
may offer more insights than musicians. Thanks.


  #2   Report Post  
Old July 16th 06, 08:12 PM posted to rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default least crowded frequency band for wireless mic?

On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 17:16:44 GMT, "peter" wrote:

I want to buy a wireless mic set and it comes in one of three bands that I
have to choose at the time of purchase:

518 to 554 MHz
626 to 662 MHz
740 to 776 MHz

The goal is to pick the band with the least interference.

The manufacturer's web site has a table showing TV stations in my city
(seattle), and it look like it's clear in the 740 to 776 MHz range. So
should I buy the set in this range or is there more research to be done?


If you're in a small city (it sounds as if this is the case), you
don't have to worry too much. If not, the only "research" that would
do you any good, aside from [tie in to a scanner group] listening and
finding out which band actually is the least used, would be finding
out which bands will be used more heavily in the future, and that's
impossible.

You may want to research how wireless mics actually work. Unless
you're looking for very long range (illegal) with large antennas
(illegal), you probably won't have anyone else running a wireless mic
close enough to your site to have to worry about it. If the situation
is indoors, it's even better for you - you have some control over
ambient signals.

BTW, they said the table is created in 2002. Does anyone know where to find
an updated frequency usage table for a given city?


The FCC's web site, but it's not easy getting that information out of
the database. There's no site I know of that'll present it to you in
the simple way Sennheiser did in that table.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electromagnetic Radiation N9OGL General 31 March 1st 06 03:42 PM
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) Jon Noring Shortwave 103 June 30th 04 08:13 PM
MilAir Monitoring from KeyWest - Lots of Comms! GeorgeF Scanner 1 May 13th 04 10:37 PM
We Need a BANDWIDTH-BASED Frequency Plan - NOT Mode-Based. Expeditionradio Policy 43 February 8th 04 09:47 PM
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 GeorgeF Shortwave 0 September 12th 03 04:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017