Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slow Code wrote:
It's written tests and CW that keep the sick, lame, and lazy, out of your receiver, not a plonk button or kill-filter. Don't degrade receiver performance. Support keeping CW, and increasing the speed requirement, and make the passing score for writtens 85%. I agree in principle; we can work out the details later. What we obtain too cheaply we do not value highly. Keep the standards high. Put some teeth back in ham tests. That tends to weed out those who aren't serious. While not a panacea it would go a long way toward cleaning up a lot of the dreck we now deal with on a daily basis. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
wtd: EF Johnson Challenger Mobile Radios and Remote Heads | Equipment | |||
Remember the Fugs + tomatoes | Shortwave | |||
FS MOTOROLA RADIOS HT1000'S , VISAR'S ,& MAXTRAC'S | Equipment | |||
FS MOTOROLA RADIOS HT1000'S , VISAR'S ,& MAXTRAC'S | Equipment | |||
wtd: EF Johnson Challenger Mobile Radios and Remote Heads | Equipment |