Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Opus- wrote in
: Don't you have some offs to ****? Why do no-coders always break down in the middle of an argument and start spewing profanities? I just don't understand it. It must be do to their limited mental abilities. Opus being a Cannuk probably doesn't help either. SC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Slow Code" wrote in message hlink.net... Opus- wrote in : Don't you have some offs to ****? Why do no-coders always break down in the middle of an argument and start spewing profanities? I just don't understand it. It must be do to their limited mental abilities. Opus being a Cannuk probably doesn't help either. Just like pro-Mexican immigration Neo-Kommies, their last argument of refuge is the race card. Translation - they don't have an argument. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Libertad wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message hlink.net... Opus- wrote in : Don't you have some offs to ****? Why do no-coders always break down in the middle of an argument and start spewing profanities? I just don't understand it. It must be do to their limited mental abilities. Opus being a Cannuk probably doesn't help either. Just like pro-Mexican immigration Neo-Kommies, their last argument of refuge is the race card. Canuck is a race, 'tard boy? dx |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slow Code wrote in news:76c0h.19656$UG4.15739
@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net: well the real easy answer to that question and the only one needed is: NO. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: Opus- wrote in : Don't you have some offs to ****? Why do no-coders always break down in the middle of an argument and start spewing profanities? I just don't understand it. It must be do to their limited mental abilities. Opus being a Cannuk probably doesn't help either. SC Removing the code requirement at this late date would do little to increase the number of hams applying for a license. At one time, possibly 30 years ago it would have made sense to replace the code test with one that emphasizes skills that actually have a use in the real world. Sadly, I think that there is little that can be done to attract younger hams into the hobby. There are just too many license-free ways of communicating with people from around the world. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: On 29 Oct 2006 12:05:42 -0800, wrote: Slow Code wrote: Opus- wrote in : Don't you have some offs to ****? Why do no-coders always break down in the middle of an argument and start spewing profanities? I just don't understand it. It must be do to their limited mental abilities. Opus being a Cannuk probably doesn't help either. SC Removing the code requirement at this late date would do little to increase the number of hams applying for a license. but it can help retain those we get and encourage them into intagrate into the ARs as opposed to being driven out by such as SC How would retaining the code requirement help to retain those you do get. I do not understand. At one time, possibly 30 years ago it would have made sense to replace the code test with one that emphasizes skills that actually have a use in the real world. Sadly, I think that there is little that can be done to attract younger hams into the hobby. There are just too many license-free ways of communicating with people from around the world. http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: wrote: On 29 Oct 2006 12:05:42 -0800, wrote: Slow Code wrote: Opus- wrote in : Don't you have some offs to ****? Why do no-coders always break down in the middle of an argument and start spewing profanities? I just don't understand it. It must be do to their limited mental abilities. Opus being a Cannuk probably doesn't help either. SC Removing the code requirement at this late date would do little to increase the number of hams applying for a license. but it can help retain those we get and encourage them into intagrate into the ARs as opposed to being driven out by such as SC How would retaining the code requirement help to retain those you do get. I do not understand. obviously you do not understand since the opisite was said ending code tsting could help retain the new hams |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: On 29 Oct 2006 12:05:42 -0800, wrote: Slow Code wrote: Opus- wrote in : Don't you have some offs to ****? Why do no-coders always break down in the middle of an argument and start spewing profanities? I just don't understand it. It must be do to their limited mental abilities. Opus being a Cannuk probably doesn't help either. SC Removing the code requirement at this late date would do little to increase the number of hams applying for a license. but it can help retain those we get and encourage them into intagrate into the ARs as opposed to being driven out by such as SC How would retaining the code requirement help to retain those you do get. I do not understand. obviously you do not understand since the opisite was said ending code tsting could help retain the new hams I see that you real as well as you spell, which is not very good. I was responding to the following: "but it can help retain those we get ". |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
shortwv | Shortwave | |||
178 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave |