Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On 18 Feb 2007 20:46:30 -0800, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote in .com: May I recommend to you my personal favorite portable? It is the Sony ICF-SW7600GR How would you rank that receiver against the Sony ICF-2010 with its superb synchronous detector? FWIW - I have been able to hear some trans-Atlantic DX in the AM MW BCB on the Sony ICF-SW7600GR using a Terk AM Advantage loop. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
weatherall :: http://cobaltpet.blogspot.com/ |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Feb 2007 09:12:05 -0800, "RedPenguin"
wrote: On Feb 19, 10:39 am, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote: On Feb 19, 3:09 am, Larry Dighera wrote: On 18 Feb 2007 20:46:30 -0800, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote in .com: May I recommend to you my personal favorite portable? It is the Sony ICF-SW7600GR How would you rank that receiver against the Sony ICF-2010 with its superb synchronous detector? Dear Larry, The Sony ICF-SW7600GR has a synchronous detection circuit and is the only small portable radio currently on the market (new) to feature it. This circuit is inferior to that of the ICF-2010 as is the radio in general if you are comparing on an absolute basis. However, the '7600 has the advantage of being light and much more easily carried on trips than does the '2010 and its memories (more of them, by the way) cannot be lost as they can on the '2010. Plus, of course, the '2010 has been discontinued and is only available "used" - as you may know, I do not recommend buying "used" (with the notable exception of collectors who desire a particular model). For daily use (especially for one new to the hobby) I believe it is always better to buy "new;" both the manufacturer and the dealer have an interest in you, both hoping that you will buy more of their products. Plus, with "new," you get a one- year warranty (except if you buy from one of the Ebay dealers in China - good luck then in trying to have a defective radio repaired under warranty!). There are pros and cons regarding both of these radios but, as I said, on an absolute basis, the Sony ICF-2010 is by far the superior radio (and that includes its sync circuit). But then the Etón E1 is (apparently) superior to the '2010, the ICOM IC-R75 is superior (as a radio) and the AOR AR7030 Plus is better than all of them! Where do you stop? The original poster wants portability, very good performance, and a price tag well under $350.00. I firmly believe that, in a new radio, he will find these characteristics to best advantage in the Sony ICF-SW7600GR. Best, Joe Is it completly worth getting a shortwave radio, if mostly I just travel to New York, NY, Atlantic City, NJ and stay in my area of Johnstown, PA? What is it, exactly, that you want to hear on your radio? (You don't have to travel to other countries to hear them on shortwave.) I am not saying that the ICF-SW7600GR is not a good radio or anything but it looks like it's not really under $150 new, It should be no more than that. Check out J&R's price. It's a very good radio. so if I am going to buy a shortwave radio for that price, I want to make sure that I will be getting a radio that will work for a very long time and that shortwave will be around for a while. I don't want a radio that I paid $150 for that I will not be able to hear much and will probably hardly use. Well, look at it this way. The 7600 is a very fine AM (mediumwave) & FM portable as well as shortwave. So even if, for some weird reason, every broadcaster left the shortwave bands, you'd still be able to hear everything on AM and FM. Coupled with a set of computer speakers, it's a wonderful radio for the money. Mine is 5+ years old and works perfectly (with the exception of the thumbwheels losing "traction" and requiring a little fiddling.) -- Col. I.P. Yurin Commissariat of Internal Security Stakhanovite Order of Lenin (1937) Hero of Socialist Labor (1939) |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 19, 12:12 pm, "RedPenguin" wrote:
On Feb 19, 10:39 am, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote: On Feb 19, 3:09 am, Larry Dighera wrote: On 18 Feb 2007 20:46:30 -0800, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote in .com: May I recommend to you my personal favorite portable? It is the Sony ICF-SW7600GR How would you rank that receiver against the Sony ICF-2010 with its superb synchronous detector? Dear Larry, The Sony ICF-SW7600GR has a synchronous detection circuit and is the only small portable radio currently on the market (new) to feature it. This circuit is inferior to that of the ICF-2010 as is the radio in general if you are comparing on an absolute basis. However, the '7600 has the advantage of being light and much more easily carried on trips than does the '2010 and its memories (more of them, by the way) cannot be lost as they can on the '2010. Plus, of course, the '2010 has been discontinued and is only available "used" - as you may know, I do not recommend buying "used" (with the notable exception of collectors who desire a particular model). For daily use (especially for one new to the hobby) I believe it is always better to buy "new;" both the manufacturer and the dealer have an interest in you, both hoping that you will buy more of their products. Plus, with "new," you get a one- year warranty (except if you buy from one of the Ebay dealers in China - good luck then in trying to have a defective radio repaired under warranty!). There are pros and cons regarding both of these radios but, as I said, on an absolute basis, the Sony ICF-2010 is by far the superior radio (and that includes its sync circuit). But then the Etón E1 is (apparently) superior to the '2010, the ICOM IC-R75 is superior (as a radio) and the AOR AR7030 Plus is better than all of them! Where do you stop? The original poster wants portability, very good performance, and a price tag well under $350.00. I firmly believe that, in a new radio, he will find these characteristics to best advantage in the Sony ICF-SW7600GR. Best, Joe Is it completly worth getting a shortwave radio, if mostly I just travel to New York, NY, Atlantic City, NJ and stay in my area of Johnstown, PA? I am not saying that the ICF-SW7600GR is not a good radio or anything but it looks like it's not really under $150 new, so if I am going to buy a shortwave radio for that price, I want to make sure that I will be getting a radio that will work for a very long time and that shortwave will be around for a while. I don't want a radio that I paid $150 for that I will not be able to hear much and will probably hardly use. Dear Sir, Yes, it's well-worth buying a shortwave radio. Your $150.00 (or less) will be money well-spent. You do not yet seem to understand the merits of shortwave radio. It doesn't matter where you travel or don't travel. You do not even have to leave your house to hear many, many foreign countries on shortwave. One of the advantages of shortwave broadcasts is that they travel well. In other words, you'll be able to hear the same programs in Atlantic City, NJ as you will in your home state of Pennsylvania. I always take one of my ICF-SW7600GRs with me when we vacation in California and, believe it or not, often I can hear some of the same programs there that I hear in New Jersey (allowing for the time difference, of course). This is not ALWAYS the case; however, it is easy to find many broadcasts to hear by searching the tables on, for example, PrimeTimeShortwave. After you have learned how to listen (remember - I told you that there is a learning curve and that there is absolutely no way to compress the time necessary fto obtain experience) you will easily be able to determine just what you should be able to hear at any given location at any given time. By the way, I do the overwhelming majority of my listening right from my home as I do not travel often, just once yearly to California. The Sony ICF-SW7600GR is a revised version of the Sony ICF-SW7600G (hence the "R") which was introduced back in 1994. I own two of this original model and both still function as they did when new. I now own five '7600GRs, the first one having been purchased in 2001, the second and third in 2002, and the fourth and fifth in 2005. All function exactly the same. All always work perfectly. While I have heard of a very few isolated cases of people having some problems (this, of course, can happen with anything), I personally have never experienced even a "hiccup!" I can recommend this radio without reservation. It is reliable and very long-lasting. When you actually see one and you "heft" it (and examine it), you'll know exactly what I'm talking about! What if you decide you "hate" shortwave? Well then you still have one of the very best AM and FM portable radios ever designed. Did you know that one of the features of this radio is a true (and superb) stereo line output jack? If you run FM stereo from this radio (via a $10.00 cable sold at Radio Shack) to your audio system, I'll bet this Sony portable outperforms the FM section in your system (unless you have a very high-end one). And its AM section is one of the best ever designed for a portable. Long-distance AM reception is very easy at night as attested to by many owners. Quite a number of owners have actually heard Europe on the standard AM band with this radio (from within the US), though I personally have not. Still, it's easy to hear Canada, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and numerous distant stations with the radio just using its built-in ferrite rod antenna. You would be able to hear Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, New York, Massachusetts, Florida, and many, many other states, depending on just where in Pennsylvania you live. Do I sound like a "shill?" Those who know me from this group know that I'm not. I'm just a very satisfied owner of this radio (and, believe me, I'm "picky"). I do not know of a better radio at any price for one just starting out in this hobby. And, as I originally stated, it is a radio that is so good that the owner will never "outgrow" it. I own a couple of very sophisticated (and expensive) shortwave receivers, yet often I just turn on one of my Sonys when I want to just listen to a program. I believe you will like this radio. I know you will find it worth its cost. Best, Joe There is really no end to the merits of this radio. Yes, it is more costly than some portable shortwave receivers, but you are purchasing a true classic that will never give you "buyers' remorse." |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Feb 2007 18:16:24 -0800, "Joe Analssandrini"
wrote: On Feb 19, 12:12 pm, "RedPenguin" wrote: On Feb 19, 10:39 am, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote: On Feb 19, 3:09 am, Larry Dighera wrote: On 18 Feb 2007 20:46:30 -0800, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote in .com: May I recommend to you my personal favorite portable? It is the Sony ICF-SW7600GR How would you rank that receiver against the Sony ICF-2010 with its superb synchronous detector? Dear Larry, The Sony ICF-SW7600GR has a synchronous detection circuit and is the only small portable radio currently on the market (new) to feature it. This circuit is inferior to that of the ICF-2010 as is the radio in general if you are comparing on an absolute basis. However, the '7600 has the advantage of being light and much more easily carried on trips than does the '2010 and its memories (more of them, by the way) cannot be lost as they can on the '2010. Plus, of course, the '2010 has been discontinued and is only available "used" - as you may know, I do not recommend buying "used" (with the notable exception of collectors who desire a particular model). For daily use (especially for one new to the hobby) I believe it is always better to buy "new;" both the manufacturer and the dealer have an interest in you, both hoping that you will buy more of their products. Plus, with "new," you get a one- year warranty (except if you buy from one of the Ebay dealers in China - good luck then in trying to have a defective radio repaired under warranty!). There are pros and cons regarding both of these radios but, as I said, on an absolute basis, the Sony ICF-2010 is by far the superior radio (and that includes its sync circuit). But then the Etón E1 is (apparently) superior to the '2010, the ICOM IC-R75 is superior (as a radio) and the AOR AR7030 Plus is better than all of them! Where do you stop? The original poster wants portability, very good performance, and a price tag well under $350.00. I firmly believe that, in a new radio, he will find these characteristics to best advantage in the Sony ICF-SW7600GR. Best, Joe Is it completly worth getting a shortwave radio, if mostly I just travel to New York, NY, Atlantic City, NJ and stay in my area of Johnstown, PA? I am not saying that the ICF-SW7600GR is not a good radio or anything but it looks like it's not really under $150 new, so if I am going to buy a shortwave radio for that price, I want to make sure that I will be getting a radio that will work for a very long time and that shortwave will be around for a while. I don't want a radio that I paid $150 for that I will not be able to hear much and will probably hardly use. Dear Sir, Yes, it's well-worth buying a shortwave radio. Your $150.00 (or less) will be money well-spent. You do not yet seem to understand the merits of shortwave radio. It doesn't matter where you travel or don't travel. You do not even have to leave your house to hear many, many foreign countries on shortwave. One of the advantages of shortwave broadcasts is that they travel well. In other words, you'll be able to hear the same programs in Atlantic City, NJ as you will in your home state of Pennsylvania. I always take one of my ICF-SW7600GRs with me when we vacation in California and, believe it or not, often I can hear some of the same programs there that I hear in New Jersey (allowing for the time difference, of course). This is not ALWAYS the case; however, it is easy to find many broadcasts to hear by searching the tables on, for example, PrimeTimeShortwave. After you have learned how to listen (remember - I told you that there is a learning curve and that there is absolutely no way to compress the time necessary fto obtain experience) you will easily be able to determine just what you should be able to hear at any given location at any given time. By the way, I do the overwhelming majority of my listening right from my home as I do not travel often, just once yearly to California. The Sony ICF-SW7600GR is a revised version of the Sony ICF-SW7600G (hence the "R") which was introduced back in 1994. I own two of this original model and both still function as they did when new. I now own five '7600GRs, the first one having been purchased in 2001, the second and third in 2002, and the fourth and fifth in 2005. All function exactly the same. All always work perfectly. While I have heard of a very few isolated cases of people having some problems (this, of course, can happen with anything), I personally have never experienced even a "hiccup!" I can recommend this radio without reservation. It is reliable and very long-lasting. When you actually see one and you "heft" it (and examine it), you'll know exactly what I'm talking about! What if you decide you "hate" shortwave? Well then you still have one of the very best AM and FM portable radios ever designed. Did you know that one of the features of this radio is a true (and superb) stereo line output jack? If you run FM stereo from this radio (via a $10.00 cable sold at Radio Shack) to your audio system, I'll bet this Sony portable outperforms the FM section in your system (unless you have a very high-end one). And its AM section is one of the best ever designed for a portable. I think that's a key point that many prospective swl's don't fully realize. The 7600 -- like many other "expensive" s/w radios -- is likely to be better on both FM and regular AM than any radio they are now using. So even if they don't get bitten by the s/w bug, they will still have a very good "regular" radio. Just look at what people pay for high-end AM/FM radios: bose, cambridge, etc. $150 for the 7600 is a bargain, if you use it as a tuner and direct the sound into some decent speakers. Long-distance AM reception is very easy at night as attested to by many owners. Quite a number of owners have actually heard Europe on the standard AM band with this radio (from within the US), though I personally have not. Still, it's easy to hear Canada, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and numerous distant stations with the radio just using its built-in ferrite rod antenna. You would be able to hear Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, New York, Massachusetts, Florida, and many, many other states, depending on just where in Pennsylvania you live. Do I sound like a "shill?" Those who know me from this group know that I'm not. I'm just a very satisfied owner of this radio (and, believe me, I'm "picky"). I do not know of a better radio at any price for one just starting out in this hobby. And, as I originally stated, it is a radio that is so good that the owner will never "outgrow" it. I own a couple of very sophisticated (and expensive) shortwave receivers, yet often I just turn on one of my Sonys when I want to just listen to a program. I believe you will like this radio. I know you will find it worth its cost. Best, Joe There is really no end to the merits of this radio. Yes, it is more costly than some portable shortwave receivers, but you are purchasing a true classic that will never give you "buyers' remorse." And on that note, there's always the point that the 7600 will retain value even if the purchaser decides s/w isn't for him/her. Just buy the radio and try it for a year. If s/w isn't interesting... and if the AM/FM reception isn't impressive enough to keep it, sell it! I'm betting that in good condition with only one year's mileage on it, it'll still be worth at least 50% of the original price. -- Col. I.P. Yurin Commissariat of Internal Security Stakhanovite Order of Lenin (1937) Hero of Socialist Labor (1939) |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 19, 10:40 pm, I.P. Yurin
wrote: On 19 Feb 2007 18:16:24 -0800, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote: On Feb 19, 12:12 pm, "RedPenguin" wrote: On Feb 19, 10:39 am, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote: On Feb 19, 3:09 am, Larry Dighera wrote: On 18 Feb 2007 20:46:30 -0800, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote in .com: May I recommend to you my personal favorite portable? It is the Sony ICF-SW7600GR How would you rank that receiver against the Sony ICF-2010 with its superb synchronous detector? Dear Larry, The Sony ICF-SW7600GR has a synchronous detection circuit and is the only small portable radio currently on the market (new) to feature it. This circuit is inferior to that of the ICF-2010 as is the radio in general if you are comparing on an absolute basis. However, the '7600 has the advantage of being light and much more easily carried on trips than does the '2010 and its memories (more of them, by the way) cannot be lost as they can on the '2010. Plus, of course, the '2010 has been discontinued and is only available "used" - as you may know, I do not recommend buying "used" (with the notable exception of collectors who desire a particular model). For daily use (especially for one new to the hobby) I believe it is always better to buy "new;" both the manufacturer and the dealer have an interest in you, both hoping that you will buy more of their products. Plus, with "new," you get a one- year warranty (except if you buy from one of the Ebay dealers in China - good luck then in trying to have a defective radio repaired under warranty!). There are pros and cons regarding both of these radios but, as I said, on an absolute basis, the Sony ICF-2010 is by far the superior radio (and that includes its sync circuit). But then the Etón E1 is (apparently) superior to the '2010, the ICOM IC-R75 is superior (as a radio) and the AOR AR7030 Plus is better than all of them! Where do you stop? The original poster wants portability, very good performance, and a price tag well under $350.00. I firmly believe that, in a new radio, he will find these characteristics to best advantage in the Sony ICF-SW7600GR. Best, Joe Is it completly worth getting a shortwave radio, if mostly I just travel to New York, NY, Atlantic City, NJ and stay in my area of Johnstown, PA? I am not saying that the ICF-SW7600GR is not a good radio or anything but it looks like it's not really under $150 new, so if I am going to buy a shortwave radio for that price, I want to make sure that I will be getting a radio that will work for a very long time and that shortwave will be around for a while. I don't want a radio that I paid $150 for that I will not be able to hear much and will probably hardly use. Dear Sir, Yes, it's well-worth buying a shortwave radio. Your $150.00 (or less) will be money well-spent. You do not yet seem to understand the merits of shortwave radio. It doesn't matter where you travel or don't travel. You do not even have to leave your house to hear many, many foreign countries on shortwave. One of the advantages of shortwave broadcasts is that they travel well. In other words, you'll be able to hear the same programs in Atlantic City, NJ as you will in your home state of Pennsylvania. I always take one of my ICF-SW7600GRs with me when we vacation in California and, believe it or not, often I can hear some of the same programs there that I hear in New Jersey (allowing for the time difference, of course). This is not ALWAYS the case; however, it is easy to find many broadcasts to hear by searching the tables on, for example, PrimeTimeShortwave. After you have learned how to listen (remember - I told you that there is a learning curve and that there is absolutely no way to compress the time necessary fto obtain experience) you will easily be able to determine just what you should be able to hear at any given location at any given time. By the way, I do the overwhelming majority of my listening right from my home as I do not travel often, just once yearly to California. The Sony ICF-SW7600GR is a revised version of the Sony ICF-SW7600G (hence the "R") which was introduced back in 1994. I own two of this original model and both still function as they did when new. I now own five '7600GRs, the first one having been purchased in 2001, the second and third in 2002, and the fourth and fifth in 2005. All function exactly the same. All always work perfectly. While I have heard of a very few isolated cases of people having some problems (this, of course, can happen with anything), I personally have never experienced even a "hiccup!" I can recommend this radio without reservation. It is reliable and very long-lasting. When you actually see one and you "heft" it (and examine it), you'll know exactly what I'm talking about! What if you decide you "hate" shortwave? Well then you still have one of the very best AM and FM portable radios ever designed. Did you know that one of the features of this radio is a true (and superb) stereo line output jack? If you run FM stereo from this radio (via a $10.00 cable sold at Radio Shack) to your audio system, I'll bet this Sony portable outperforms the FM section in your system (unless you have a very high-end one). And its AM section is one of the best ever designed for a portable. I think that's a key point that many prospective swl's don't fully realize. The 7600 -- like many other "expensive" s/w radios -- is likely to be better on both FM and regular AM than any radio they are now using. So even if they don't get bitten by the s/w bug, they will still have a very good "regular" radio. Just look at what people pay for high-end AM/FM radios: bose, cambridge, etc. $150 for the 7600 is a bargain, if you use it as a tuner and direct the sound into some decent speakers. Long-distance AM reception is very easy at night as attested to by many owners. Quite a number of owners have actually heard Europe on the standard AM band with this radio (from within the US), though I personally have not. Still, it's easy to hear Canada, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and numerous distant stations with the radio just using its built-in ferrite rod antenna. You would be able to hear Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, New York, Massachusetts, Florida, and many, many other states, depending on just where in Pennsylvania you live. Do I sound like a "shill?" Those who know me from this group know that I'm not. I'm just a very satisfied owner of this radio (and, believe me, I'm "picky"). I do not know of a better radio at any price for one just starting out in this hobby. And, as I originally stated, it is a radio that is so good that the owner will never "outgrow" it. I own a couple of very sophisticated (and expensive) shortwave receivers, yet often I just turn on one of my Sonys when I want to just listen to a program. I believe you will like this radio. I know you will find it worth its cost. Best, Joe There is really no end to the merits of this radio. Yes, it is more costly than some portable shortwave receivers, but you are purchasing a true classic that will never give you "buyers' remorse." And on that note, there's always the point that the 7600 will retain value even if the purchaser decides s/w isn't for him/her. Just buy the radio and try it for a year. If s/w isn't interesting... and if the AM/FM reception isn't impressive enough to keep it, sell it! I'm betting that in good condition with only one year's mileage on it, it'll still be worth at least 50% of the original price. -- Col. I.P. Yurin Commissariat of Internal Security Stakhanovite Order of Lenin (1937) Hero of Socialist Labor (1939) Ok, thank you guys/gals for all your help. I believe I am defiantly going to purchase this radio then. It will make a perfect addition to my radio collection. Especially with my Uniden BR330T, even though that's not a shortwave reciever in the true word, it's an awesome scanner and receives some shortwave. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 19, 10:40 pm, I.P. Yurin
wrote: On 19 Feb 2007 18:16:24 -0800, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote: On Feb 19, 12:12 pm, "RedPenguin" wrote: On Feb 19, 10:39 am, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote: On Feb 19, 3:09 am, Larry Dighera wrote: On 18 Feb 2007 20:46:30 -0800, "Joe Analssandrini" wrote in .com: May I recommend to you my personal favorite portable? It is the Sony ICF-SW7600GR How would you rank that receiver against the Sony ICF-2010 with its superb synchronous detector? Dear Larry, The Sony ICF-SW7600GR has a synchronous detection circuit and is the only small portable radio currently on the market (new) to feature it. This circuit is inferior to that of the ICF-2010 as is the radio in general if you are comparing on an absolute basis. However, the '7600 has the advantage of being light and much more easily carried on trips than does the '2010 and its memories (more of them, by the way) cannot be lost as they can on the '2010. Plus, of course, the '2010 has been discontinued and is only available "used" - as you may know, I do not recommend buying "used" (with the notable exception of collectors who desire a particular model). For daily use (especially for one new to the hobby) I believe it is always better to buy "new;" both the manufacturer and the dealer have an interest in you, both hoping that you will buy more of their products. Plus, with "new," you get a one- year warranty (except if you buy from one of the Ebay dealers in China - good luck then in trying to have a defective radio repaired under warranty!). There are pros and cons regarding both of these radios but, as I said, on an absolute basis, the Sony ICF-2010 is by far the superior radio (and that includes its sync circuit). But then the Etón E1 is (apparently) superior to the '2010, the ICOM IC-R75 is superior (as a radio) and the AOR AR7030 Plus is better than all of them! Where do you stop? The original poster wants portability, very good performance, and a price tag well under $350.00. I firmly believe that, in a new radio, he will find these characteristics to best advantage in the Sony ICF-SW7600GR. Best, Joe Is it completly worth getting a shortwave radio, if mostly I just travel to New York, NY, Atlantic City, NJ and stay in my area of Johnstown, PA? I am not saying that the ICF-SW7600GR is not a good radio or anything but it looks like it's not really under $150 new, so if I am going to buy a shortwave radio for that price, I want to make sure that I will be getting a radio that will work for a very long time and that shortwave will be around for a while. I don't want a radio that I paid $150 for that I will not be able to hear much and will probably hardly use. Dear Sir, Yes, it's well-worth buying a shortwave radio. Your $150.00 (or less) will be money well-spent. You do not yet seem to understand the merits of shortwave radio. It doesn't matter where you travel or don't travel. You do not even have to leave your house to hear many, many foreign countries on shortwave. One of the advantages of shortwave broadcasts is that they travel well. In other words, you'll be able to hear the same programs in Atlantic City, NJ as you will in your home state of Pennsylvania. I always take one of my ICF-SW7600GRs with me when we vacation in California and, believe it or not, often I can hear some of the same programs there that I hear in New Jersey (allowing for the time difference, of course). This is not ALWAYS the case; however, it is easy to find many broadcasts to hear by searching the tables on, for example, PrimeTimeShortwave. After you have learned how to listen (remember - I told you that there is a learning curve and that there is absolutely no way to compress the time necessary fto obtain experience) you will easily be able to determine just what you should be able to hear at any given location at any given time. By the way, I do the overwhelming majority of my listening right from my home as I do not travel often, just once yearly to California. The Sony ICF-SW7600GR is a revised version of the Sony ICF-SW7600G (hence the "R") which was introduced back in 1994. I own two of this original model and both still function as they did when new. I now own five '7600GRs, the first one having been purchased in 2001, the second and third in 2002, and the fourth and fifth in 2005. All function exactly the same. All always work perfectly. While I have heard of a very few isolated cases of people having some problems (this, of course, can happen with anything), I personally have never experienced even a "hiccup!" I can recommend this radio without reservation. It is reliable and very long-lasting. When you actually see one and you "heft" it (and examine it), you'll know exactly what I'm talking about! What if you decide you "hate" shortwave? Well then you still have one of the very best AM and FM portable radios ever designed. Did you know that one of the features of this radio is a true (and superb) stereo line output jack? If you run FM stereo from this radio (via a $10.00 cable sold at Radio Shack) to your audio system, I'll bet this Sony portable outperforms the FM section in your system (unless you have a very high-end one). And its AM section is one of the best ever designed for a portable. I think that's a key point that many prospective swl's don't fully realize. The 7600 -- like many other "expensive" s/w radios -- is likely to be better on both FM and regular AM than any radio they are now using. So even if they don't get bitten by the s/w bug, they will still have a very good "regular" radio. Just look at what people pay for high-end AM/FM radios: bose, cambridge, etc. $150 for the 7600 is a bargain, if you use it as a tuner and direct the sound into some decent speakers. Long-distance AM reception is very easy at night as attested to by many owners. Quite a number of owners have actually heard Europe on the standard AM band with this radio (from within the US), though I personally have not. Still, it's easy to hear Canada, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and numerous distant stations with the radio just using its built-in ferrite rod antenna. You would be able to hear Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, New York, Massachusetts, Florida, and many, many other states, depending on just where in Pennsylvania you live. Do I sound like a "shill?" Those who know me from this group know that I'm not. I'm just a very satisfied owner of this radio (and, believe me, I'm "picky"). I do not know of a better radio at any price for one just starting out in this hobby. And, as I originally stated, it is a radio that is so good that the owner will never "outgrow" it. I own a couple of very sophisticated (and expensive) shortwave receivers, yet often I just turn on one of my Sonys when I want to just listen to a program. I believe you will like this radio. I know you will find it worth its cost. Best, Joe There is really no end to the merits of this radio. Yes, it is more costly than some portable shortwave receivers, but you are purchasing a true classic that will never give you "buyers' remorse." And on that note, there's always the point that the 7600 will retain value even if the purchaser decides s/w isn't for him/her. Just buy the radio and try it for a year. If s/w isn't interesting... and if the AM/FM reception isn't impressive enough to keep it, sell it! I'm betting that in good condition with only one year's mileage on it, it'll still be worth at least 50% of the original price. -- Col. I.P. Yurin Commissariat of Internal Security Stakhanovite Order of Lenin (1937) Hero of Socialist Labor (1939) Now my last question is, what is the trick to shortwave, to figure out what station you got? I hear that stations can change all the time and some stations seem to have the same frequency depending on what area they are in. Also, I kinda understand, but why is it that shortwave can actually go so far yet AM and FM barely go anywhere? I guess shortwave stations just have more power right? |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Feb 2007 22:18:33 -0800, "RedPenguin"
wrote in .com: why is it that shortwave can actually go so far yet AM and FM barely go anywhere? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_propagation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_useable_frequency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DX_communication http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_Wave_Listener |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() SomeOne Wrote why is it that shortwave can actually go so far yet AM and FM barely go anywhere? FM is in the VHF band thus is essentially line of sight (like TV Stations) AM stations have a coverage during the day that is local - a few hundred miles example I am in San Diego and can pick up LA stations 90 miles away. At night one of the atmosphere layers dissipates and AM stations can be heard all across the country. Example on a good night during the winter I can pick up WGN Chicago - 1700 miles For AM you will need a good antenna and listen at night during the winter months. All this is explained (no math) at URL: http://ecjones.org/propag.html CL |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 1:18 am, "RedPenguin" wrote:
On Feb 19, 10:40 pm, I.P. Yurin wrote: Now my last question is, what is the trick to shortwave, to figure out what station you got? I hear that stations can change all the time and some stations seem to have the same frequency depending on what area they are in. Also, I kinda understand, but why is it that shortwave can actually go so far yet AM and FM barely go anywhere? I guess shortwave stations just have more power right? Dear Sir, There is no "trick" to identifying a shortwave station in the sense you mean. There is ONLY experience, a few good references, and careful listening. I haven't stated it yet on this thread (but those who know me well from my other postings know what's coming next!) - if you want to get the most from the shortwave hobby, while internet sites are invaluable, the two books PASSPORT TO WORLD BAND RADIO and WORLD RADIO TV HANDBOOK are essential. Both are available inexpensively from Amazon, as well as local bookstores. Many of the better mail-order radio dealers also sell them. These books are published yearly. I buy each new edition as it is published. These books, which do not really overlap but rather complement each other, make the hobby far more enjoyable. Trying to listen to shortwave without these books is, in my opinion, just like a lawyer trying to get by without the Law Review, a doctor trying to get by without the PDR, or an engineer trying to get by without the CRC Handbook. These books will explain to you just how shortwave signals travel around the world. In addition, they will give you an excellent overview of the hobby and will answer the great majority of your questions.. I hope you don't think I'm being supercilious or condescending to you. That is certainly not my intention. I sincerely want to encourage you (and anyone else interested) in the shortwave hobby. Like any other worthwhile hobby, there are things that must be learned. One cannot actually learn until one has the proper tools, in this case a shortwave receiver of good quality. Once you actually get the radio, carefully study the instruction manual, and, I hope, buy and study the references I mention as well as studying some online informational sites (especially RadioIntel.com and PrimeTimeShortwave.com), then you'll be well on your way to becoming a DXer. Plus you'll be able to avail yourself of a great deal of news and commentary from very different perspectives than is available on our local "mass media," as well as some great and exotic entertainment. I'll say it once mo there's no substitute for experience and there's no way to get that experience except by putting in the time and effort necessary. That is the "trick" to identifying stations and for shortwave listening in general. But first you need to buy the radio. All else will follow. Best, Joe |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|