Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For
Satellite Radio?" http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...s-will-it.html Notable quote: "It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not considered competition, but paid service would be!" Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio, forever. Great news ! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... "If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For Satellite Radio?" http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...s-will-it.html Notable quote: "It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not considered competition, but paid service would be!" It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to 4 unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each. Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio, forever. Great news ! There is no news of this whatsoever. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 1:57�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... "If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For Satellite Radio?" http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...io-charges-con... Notable quote: "It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not considered competition, but paid service would be!" It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to 4 unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each. Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio, forever. *Great news ! There is no news of this whatsoever. Yea, your are rigtht and RWOnline is wrong: "Is Pay-for-Play HD Content on Horizon?" "For more than a year, Ibiquity officials have been working with NDS, a technology contractor, to develop a conditional access feature for HD Radio. With field testing underway at a Florida public station, some proponents hope conditional access is the next big feature for HD Radio and think receivers that can handle the capability may be available by the end of the year. Much must happen to make that a reality." http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0049/t.4028.html It won't be up to individual broadcasters. As I said, HD Radio is failing and this is the only way to attempt to recoup the huge losses, due to the failed $500,000,000 HD Radio Alliance ad campaign. As Ramsey said, "it will be a long, slow race to the bottom": "Sirius, XM, and HD: Consumer interest reality check" "While interest in satellite radio is diminishing, interest in HD shows no signs of a pulse." http://www.hear2.com/2007/02/sirius_xm_and_h.html |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 1:57�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... "If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For Satellite Radio?" http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...io-charges-con... Notable quote: "It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not considered competition, but paid service would be!" It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to 4 unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each. Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio, forever. *Great news ! There is no news of this whatsoever. "WUSF Testing Conditional Access" http://rwonline.com/pages/s.0049/t.4029.html Notable quote: "WUSF(FM) in Tampa, a long-time IBOC test bed and the first public station to go IBOC, is the site of conditional access field testing for HD Radio this spring. Tests were to begin March 19 and continue through early May, according to Tom Dollenmayer, station manager for radio and TV, WUSF Public Broadcasting." Oh sorry, I seemed to have missed this article from Radio World Online. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 30, 1:57?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... "If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For Satellite Radio?" http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...io-charges-con... Notable quote: "It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not considered competition, but paid service would be!" It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to 4 unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each. Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio, forever. Great news ! There is no news of this whatsoever. "WUSF Testing Conditional Access" This is a test by a public station, and there is so far no interest on the part of commercial stations... the other issue is that there is absolutely no economic model for charging for single channels at the local level. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 4:05?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 30, 1:57?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... "If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For Satellite Radio?" http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...io-charges-con... Notable quote: "It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not considered competition, but paid service would be!" It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to 4 unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each. Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio, forever. Great news ! There is no news of this whatsoever. "WUSF Testing Conditional Access" This is a test by a public station, and there is so far no interest on the part of commercial stations... the other issue is that there is absolutely no economic model for charging for single channels at the local level.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Doesn't matter what you say, because all of this is negative publicity for HD Radio on a national level - LOL !!! BAWAHAAA !!! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 5:25?pm, "HD Radio?" wrote:
AGENDA On the Government's dole no girlfriend, no wife, no kids, just a mouth full of profanity from America Online nearManassas, VA wrote in message oups.com "I have been researching/posting on this subject for a year, and have a zillion links set up, and know exactly how and where to find information, to counter little punks like you and David Edurado" wrote in message ups.com... Good cocksucker, I ****ed you off. wrote in message oups.com... Dumb **** Guerite HD/IBOC Shill -- amazing how much time you have to waste in your small adolescent mind -- Glad, that you are impressed - is that all you got, buddy ? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 5:25?pm, "HD Radio?" wrote:
AGENDA On the Government's dole no girlfriend, no wife, no kids, just a mouth full of profanity from America Online nearManassas, VA wrote in message oups.com "I have been researching/posting on this subject for a year, and have a zillion links set up, and know exactly how and where to find information, to counter little punks like you and David Edurado" wrote in message ups.com... Good cocksucker, I ****ed you off. wrote in message oups.com... Dumb **** Guerite HD/IBOC Shill -- amazing how much time you have to waste in your small adolescent mind -- Personal attcks, such as this, just mean that I have won the HD Radio War ! BAWAHAAAAA ! |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 4:05?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 30, 1:57?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... "If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For Satellite Radio?" http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...io-charges-con... Notable quote: "It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not considered competition, but paid service would be!" It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to 4 unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each. Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio, forever. Great news ! There is no news of this whatsoever. "WUSF Testing Conditional Access" This is a test by a public station, and there is so far no interest on the part of commercial stations... the other issue is that there is absolutely no economic model for charging for single channels at the local level.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Doesn't matter what you post on this, and radioinfo's little-read message boards. What does matter, is negative publicity for HD Radio on a national level, and that is exactly what is happening. Even if you were right, which I highly-doubt, just the thought of HD Radio charging for content puts it smack behind Satellite Radio, forever - just having these articles on RWOnline is enough, and they will be picked up and spread across the Web - you are, ****-out-of-luck ! BAWAHAAA !!! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
radio content | General | |||
BBC Radio 1 show - number station content. | Shortwave | |||
Enbridge/Consumers CTCSS TONE | Scanner |