China Could Potentially Defeat U.S. in Conflict Over Taiwan by Limiting
Military Access, RAND Study Finds

SANTA MONICA, Calif., March 29 (AScribe Newswire) -- China could potentially
defeat the United States in a future military conflict over Taiwan by using
strategies designed to limit U.S. military access to the area, according to
a report issued today by the RAND Corporation.

The report examines scenarios in which China might employ what are known as
"antiaccess" strategies - actions that would impede the deployment of U.S.
forces into a combat zone, limit the locations from which American forces
could operate, or compel the U.S. military to conduct operations farther
from the conflict than it would prefer.

RAND researchers have identified a number of measures that U.S. forces can
take in order to neutralize possible antiaccess strategies. These include:
deploying air and missile defense systems near critical facilities; moving
vulnerable ships out of port at the first sign of conflict; and reducing
vulnerabilities in communications and computer systems.

Since China could also use political and diplomatic strategies aimed at
jeopardizing access to forward bases in places such as Japan, researchers
also recommend that U.S. strategists strengthen both the alliance
relationships with such countries and their military and technological
capabilities.

"The most likely conflict between the United States and China would be over
Taiwan," said lead study author Roger Cliff. "Although the United States
currently has an overwhelming conventional military advantage, China could
accomplish the objective of forcing Taiwan to surrender by employing an
antiaccess strategy of preventing enough U.S. forces from getting to the
region in time."

Cliff and his fellow researchers noted that, since the end of the Cold War,
U.S. strategists have become increasingly concerned that an adversary might
adopt and attempt to employ strategies designed to interfere with the U.S.
military's ability to deploy or operate in overseas conflicts.

Potential foreign adversaries like China are likely to use such strategies
because it is improbable they could defeat the United States in a
traditional military combat, the study says. Additionally, the absence of a
single dominant adversary means the United States will have relatively few
forward-deployed forces in the vicinity of a conflict before it erupts.

The study says potential Chinese antiaccess strategies include:

- Pressuring American allies such as Japan to limit or deny the United
States the use of bases on their territory in a conflict.

- Striking or jamming information and computer systems to delay the
deployment of U.S. military forces or to deny the United States access to
information about enemy locations.

- Disrupting U.S. logistics systems to prevent the timely delivery of
supplies and delay the arrival of critical reinforcements.

- Attacking air bases and ports to prevent or disrupt an influx of forces
and supplies.

- Attacking naval assets such as aircraft carriers to limit the U.S. ability
to launch aircraft from the sea.

"The net result of these strategies is that China could actually defeat the
United States in a conflict -- not in the traditional sense of destroying
the U.S. military, but in the sense of China accomplishing its military and
political objectives while preventing America from achieving some or all of
its objectives," Cliff said.

"The Chinese People's Liberation Army is well aware of its own shortcomings
and the United States' military superiority," Cliff said. "Instead of
engaging U.S. forces head-on, they would attempt to take advantage of what
they perceive to be American weaknesses - including the need to deploy and
operate forces thousands of miles from home."

Researchers for RAND, a nonprofit research organization, examined Chinese
military publications to determine what types of antiaccess strategies
Chinese military analysts are considering employing. Most previous
antiaccess studies relied on "mirror imaging" techniques, in which American
analysts simply imagine what they would do if they were in China's position.

The research was sponsored by the United States Air Force and conducted by
RAND Project AIR FORCE, a federally funded research and development center
for studies and analysis aimed at providing independent policy alternatives
for the U.S. Air Force.

The report, "Entering the Dragon's Lair: Chinese Antiaccess Strategies and
Their Implications for the United States," is available at www.rand.org.

http://newswire.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/...=2007&public=0

--
__________________________________________________ _______________
Est autem fides credere quod nondum vides;cuius fidei merces est videre quod
credis
HD RADIO is here! http://www.HDRadio.com
DUNCAN HUNTER for PRESIDENT http://www.GoHunter08.com
WHAT THE LEFT WON'T TELL YOU http://www.FrontPageMag.com
WHAT COMMUNISTS WON'T TELL YOU http://China-E-Lobby.blogspot.com
WHAT ISLAM WON'T TELL YOU http://www.WhatTheWestNeedsToKnow.com
__________________________________________________ _______________