"Cato" wrote
You want to bankrupt the western nations?

Listen to the economic chicken little crying that the sky will fall.

In reality, estimates of economic impact show a .2% decline in economic
output to solve this problem at worst to a 2% rise in economic output due to
increases in fuel consumptive efficiencies.


"Cato" wrote
Because that is what it would take. And even then, the way Kyoto
is set up, it won't amount to a hill of beans as far as stopping
Global Warming.

Correct, it is the first step of many that are needed to reduce global
emissions by around 70% and AmeriKKKan emisions around 85-95%

Can't live with that? Too bad. Your choice is live within your
constraints, or die.


"Cato" wrote
Socialists!

And now the cocksucker devolves into partisain politics. Science means
nothing to pieces of **** like Cato. Their KKKonservative Politics trumps
reality every time in their dung filled brains.


"Cato" wrote
God they never quit in their quest to place more
and more control over our lives, and gain political control for
themselves.

Capitulate or die Cato.. Capitulate or die.

"Telamon" wrote
You need to read up on it then. It was a BIG issue before global cooling
came along.

Wrong again **** Licker.

There was never any issue warning of imminent, dangerous global cooling
issued by the scientific community.

Why are you reapeating a lie?

Vendicar Decarian wrote:

"Telamon" wrote
You need to read up on it then. It was a BIG issue before global cooling
came along.

Wrong again **** Licker.

There was never any issue warning of imminent, dangerous global cooling
issued by the scientific community.

Why are you reapeating a lie?

Damn! I think we got ourselves another mentally ill Canuck here!

"Wolfowitz Mass Murder for OIL"
wrote
How long does it take to accept a crystal clear reality: Paul
Wolfowitz is not a leader, but someone better suited for a
professional data crunching job in which he is not a policymaker,
analyst or decision maker.

Wolfowitz is a single pustule in a bad case of achne. In any civilized
nation he would be unemployeble since he is incapable of learning from his
past mistakes and since he is completely corrupt.

I wouldn't hire Wolfowitz to flip burgers since I can not trust him to avoid
spitting on the grill.

Vendicar Decarian wrote:
"Telamon" wrote
You need to read up on it then. It was a BIG issue before global cooling
came along.

Wrong again **** Licker.

There was never any issue warning of imminent, dangerous global cooling
issued by the scientific community.


In 1972 it made the NBC, ABC and CBS evening news.


And it made radio news as well. Even the BBC was talking about it on
the World Service.

This was quite a big story. And yes, it came from the scientific
community.



Why are you reapeating a lie?


Because it isn't.

Vendicar Decarian wrote:

"Wolfowitz Mass Murder for OIL"
wrote
How long does it take to accept a crystal clear reality: Paul
Wolfowitz is not a leader, but someone better suited for a
professional data crunching job in which he is not a policymaker,
analyst or decision maker.

Wolfowitz is a single pustule in a bad case of achne. In any civilized
nation he would be unemployeble since he is incapable of learning from his
past mistakes and since he is completely corrupt.

I wouldn't hire Wolfowitz to flip burgers since I can not trust him to avoid
spitting on the grill.

May must be the time for the hatching of the 'tards up in CanaDuh.

I'm LMFAO here!

"Cato" wrote
Cato responds: I am not sure how you missed all the talk
about the Global Cooling back then. Ya, it was in all the major
magazines and newspapers.

I remember Libertarian fools like Lowell Ponte trying to sell the story

But you know Libertarians... Completely and perpetually incompetent,
ignorant and corrupt to the core.

"Cato" wrote
Discussions on radio talk shows etc.

Wow, there is scientific evidence for you.


"Cato" wrote
But then... I have notice how some people's memories seem
to be very selective when their memories don't agree with their
present beliefs or political goals.

Ya we notice that about you denialists all the time. Now can you find us
three references to peer reviewed journal articles from the period that
warned of an imminent onset of an ice age?

We have been asking you Lying ****Tards to provide just three references
for the last 15 years, and so far you haven't been able to provide one.

That makes you a liar, a fool, or both, in my books.

On May 21, 4:36 pm, "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote:
"K Isham" wrote

I'm confused, how does buying a Carbon Credit eliminate air pollution?

You issue credits for the production of x tonnes of Carbon, and then allow
the marketplace to decide how to best emit that carbon and maximize economic
dollar output at the same time under the new constratint.

"K Isham" wrote

I read about how Al Gore explained how buying Carbon credits minimized his
"Carbon Footprint' when explaining why it takes $20,000 a month to
electrify his home.

To my knowledge Gore hasn't claimed to have purchased any carbon credits.
He has claimed to have purched carbon offsets. These are completely
different.

Carbon offsets, are basically a contract entered into with another company
to engange in activities that will reduce carbon emissions, or sequester the
carbon emissions equivalent to some component of your carbon emissions. In
Gore's case, the emissions resulting from his home energy use.

Oh, and Gore wasn't paying 20,000 a month to electify his home. Where did
you get that nonsense number?

And his Home isn't a home either, it includes 3 offices, his own, one for
his wife, the secret service, and of course rooms for guests, employees and
those secret service agents as well. And he has occupied it for less than a
year.

(OT) : Yes You Too Can Be The First In Your Neighborhood
To Have An Al Gore Carbon Credit's Card !

VD - So are you the un-official apologist for Al Gore ?
Or actually a Paid Agent of the Democrat Party of the USA ?

If you are so keen on Carbon Credits... Then Hold-your-Breath
until Al Gore is re-elected to something important.

-if- i sound rich and phony - it's cause . . .
i am trying to sound just like al gore ~ RHF

RHF wrote:

On May 21, 4:36 pm, "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote:
"K Isham" wrote

I'm confused, how does buying a Carbon Credit eliminate air pollution?

You issue credits for the production of x tonnes of Carbon, and then allow
the marketplace to decide how to best emit that carbon and maximize economic
dollar output at the same time under the new constratint.

"K Isham" wrote

I read about how Al Gore explained how buying Carbon credits minimized his
"Carbon Footprint' when explaining why it takes $20,000 a month to
electrify his home.

To my knowledge Gore hasn't claimed to have purchased any carbon credits.
He has claimed to have purched carbon offsets. These are completely
different.

Carbon offsets, are basically a contract entered into with another company
to engange in activities that will reduce carbon emissions, or sequester the
carbon emissions equivalent to some component of your carbon emissions. In
Gore's case, the emissions resulting from his home energy use.

Oh, and Gore wasn't paying 20,000 a month to electify his home. Where did
you get that nonsense number?

And his Home isn't a home either, it includes 3 offices, his own, one for
his wife, the secret service, and of course rooms for guests, employees and
those secret service agents as well. And he has occupied it for less than a
year.

(OT) : Yes You Too Can Be The First In Your Neighborhood
To Have An Al Gore Carbon Credit's Card !

VD - So are you the un-official apologist for Al Gore ?
Or actually a Paid Agent of the Democrat Party of the USA ?

More than likely just another dumbass Canuck. It's springtime, and the little
*******s get to run around for a few weeks.

dxAce wrote:

RHF wrote:

On May 21, 4:36 pm, "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote:
"K Isham" wrote

I'm confused, how does buying a Carbon Credit eliminate air pollution?
You issue credits for the production of x tonnes of Carbon, and then allow
the marketplace to decide how to best emit that carbon and maximize economic
dollar output at the same time under the new constratint.

"K Isham" wrote

I read about how Al Gore explained how buying Carbon credits minimized his
"Carbon Footprint' when explaining why it takes $20,000 a month to
electrify his home.
To my knowledge Gore hasn't claimed to have purchased any carbon credits.
He has claimed to have purched carbon offsets. These are completely
different.

Carbon offsets, are basically a contract entered into with another company
to engange in activities that will reduce carbon emissions, or sequester the
carbon emissions equivalent to some component of your carbon emissions. In
Gore's case, the emissions resulting from his home energy use.

Oh, and Gore wasn't paying 20,000 a month to electify his home. Where did
you get that nonsense number?

And his Home isn't a home either, it includes 3 offices, his own, one for
his wife, the secret service, and of course rooms for guests, employees and
those secret service agents as well. And he has occupied it for less than a
year.
(OT) : Yes You Too Can Be The First In Your Neighborhood
To Have An Al Gore Carbon Credit's Card !

VD - So are you the un-official apologist for Al Gore ?
Or actually a Paid Agent of the Democrat Party of the USA ?

More than likely just another dumbass Canuck. It's springtime, and the little
*******s get to run around for a few weeks.




Or as my ex-used to say, "all the little gonads have come out to play."


She didn't care for shortwave radio, either.