Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a new Yahoo group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RFICausedBySDRIQ/
which may be of interest to those who own or may purchase an SDR-IQ. The purpose of the group is to exchange information about RFI caused by the SDR-IQ and how to reduce or eliminate the RFI. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 1, 7:39 pm, "RF Caused By SDR-IQ"
wrote: There is a new Yahoo grouphttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/RFICausedBySDRIQ/ which may be of interest to those who own or may purchase an SDR-IQ. The purpose of the group is to exchange information about RFI caused by the SDR-IQ and how to reduce or eliminate the RFI. The obvious solution is . . . not to buy one. ~ RHF |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com, RHF
writes On Jun 1, 7:39 pm, "RF Caused By SDR-IQ" wrote: There is a new Yahoo grouphttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/RFICausedBySDRIQ/ which may be of interest to those who own or may purchase an SDR-IQ. The purpose of the group is to exchange information about RFI caused by the SDR-IQ and how to reduce or eliminate the RFI. The obvious solution is . . . not to buy one. ~ RHF . . . . OK. What's 'SDR-IQ'? Ian. -- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 1, 10:39 pm, "RF Caused By SDR-IQ"
wrote: There is a new Yahoo grouphttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/RFICausedBySDRIQ/ which may be of interest to those who own or may purchase an SDR-IQ. The purpose of the group is to exchange information about RFI caused by the SDR-IQ and how to reduce or eliminate the RFI. Even with the link; it still makes little sense; http://www.rfspace.com/sdriq.html Why the hell don;t these guys tell us SDR stands for Software Defined Receiver.. receiving Sonar and Sound ? Listening to Bats ? - Why post here.. Who are these guys selling this thing to ? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() - Why post here.. Who are these guys selling this thing to ? DX-ers. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 8:04 am, Ian Jackson
wrote: In message . com, writes On Jun 1, 10:39 pm, "RF Caused By SDR-IQ" wrote: There is a new Yahoo grouphttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/RFICausedBySDRIQ/ which may be of interest to those who own or may purchase an SDR-IQ. The purpose of the group is to exchange information about RFI caused by the SDR-IQ and how to reduce or eliminate the RFI. Even with the link; it still makes little sense; http://www.rfspace.com/sdriq.html Why the hell don;t these guys tell us SDR stands for Software Defined Receiver.. receiving Sonar and Sound ? Listening to Bats ? - Why post here.. Who are these guys selling this thing to ? Thanks for the 'Software Defined Receiver'. I suppose it's obvious to those in the know. Being an analogue sort of person, I'm a bit of a dinosaur when it comes to these newfangled devices, but it certainly looks interesting. Unfortunately, all things digital tend to generate radio frequency interference, and it takes a lot of design skill to make them usable. Undoubtedly, the designers of the RDF-IQ will have taken this into account. As this is the rec.radio.shortwave NG, it makes perfect sense to publicise this 500Hz to 30MHz receiver here. Free samples to all our readers? Ian. --- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well the humble little TenTec RX320D on my desk doesn't seem to generate any irritating noise. It just does its job reliably and without complaint. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message . com, Steve
writes On Jun 2, 8:04 am, Ian Jackson wrote: In message . com, writes On Jun 1, 10:39 pm, "RF Caused By SDR-IQ" wrote: There is a new Yahoo grouphttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/RFICausedBySDRIQ/ which may be of interest to those who own or may purchase an SDR-IQ. The purpose of the group is to exchange information about RFI caused by the SDR-IQ and how to reduce or eliminate the RFI. Even with the link; it still makes little sense; http://www.rfspace.com/sdriq.html Why the hell don;t these guys tell us SDR stands for Software Defined Receiver.. receiving Sonar and Sound ? Listening to Bats ? - Why post here.. Who are these guys selling this thing to ? Thanks for the 'Software Defined Receiver'. I suppose it's obvious to those in the know. Being an analogue sort of person, I'm a bit of a dinosaur when it comes to these newfangled devices, but it certainly looks interesting. Unfortunately, all things digital tend to generate radio frequency interference, and it takes a lot of design skill to make them usable. Undoubtedly, the designers of the RDF-IQ will have taken this into account. As this is the rec.radio.shortwave NG, it makes perfect sense to publicise this 500Hz to 30MHz receiver here. Free samples to all our readers? Ian. --- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well the humble little TenTec RX320D on my desk doesn't seem to generate any irritating noise. It just does its job reliably and without complaint. Yes, I see that it gets very good reviews. Lots of 5 out of 5 in Eham. Ian. -- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "RF Caused By SDR-IQ" wrote in message . .. There is a new Yahoo group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RFICausedBySDRIQ/ which may be of interest to those who own or may purchase an SDR-IQ. The purpose of the group is to exchange information about RFI caused by the SDR-IQ and how to reduce or eliminate the RFI. Is it interfering with itself or other devices. If it is interfering with itself it is perhaps not surprising. It is an interesting looking gadget but it is not a radio. It has no front end. It is open to the whole 500 Hz to 30 MHz all the time. If you have a strong AM broadcast station near by or a ham or CBer in the neighborhood their signal will override everything else. The SDR-IQ would make a good IF/back end. Better results would be obtained by connecting the SDR-IQ to the IF of another receiver. Or by putting an RF preselector in front of it. The TenTec RX-320D is about the same price but has a real radio front end. Unfortunately the TenTec has an RS232 rather than USB interface and the TenTec only has a 12 kHz bandwidth. -- rb |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Baker, you are obviously judging from assumptions and not facts. Of
course it is a radio. Make an internet search on the different SDRs available and user reviews. You may be surprised. Is it interfering with itself or other devices. If it is interfering with itself it is perhaps not surprising. It is an interesting looking gadget but it is not a radio. It has no front end. It is open to the whole 500 Hz to 30 MHz all the time. If you have a strong AM broadcast station near by or a ham or CBer in the neighborhood their signal will override everything else. The SDR-IQ would make a good IF/back end. Better results would be obtained by connecting the SDR-IQ to the IF of another receiver. Or by putting an RF preselector in front of it. The TenTec RX-320D is about the same price but has a real radio front end. Unfortunately the TenTec has an RS232 rather than USB interface and the TenTec only has a 12 kHz bandwidth. -- rb |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
moparhoLICK caused the following... | CB | |||
RFI caused by BPL soon resolved ? | Equipment | |||
RFI caused by BPL soon resolved ? | General | |||
RFI caused by BPL soon resolved ? | General | |||
RFI caused by BPL soon resolved ? | General |